Sentences with phrase «judge in this case showed»

(Although Ontario judges are permitted to do this where warranted, the motion judge in this case showed over-reliance on the civil rules, and misunderstood when they could be invoked.).

Not exact matches

Under Judge Salisbury's reasoning in the Massachusetts AG's case, Massachusetts must only show Equifax misled consumers in order to seek damages on their behalf.

The sufficient evidence of this point in the case of the New Testament writings is that all of them have now been shown to depend on sources, written or oral, earlier than themselves, and hence not to be the original and originating witness that the early church mistook them to be in judging them to be apostolic.

In case Abraham is not a nullity, a phantom, a show one employs for a pastime, then the fault can never consist in the fact that the sinner wants to do likewise, but the point is to see how great a thing it was that Abraham did, in order that man may judge for himself whether he has the call and the courage to be subjected to such a tesIn case Abraham is not a nullity, a phantom, a show one employs for a pastime, then the fault can never consist in the fact that the sinner wants to do likewise, but the point is to see how great a thing it was that Abraham did, in order that man may judge for himself whether he has the call and the courage to be subjected to such a tesin the fact that the sinner wants to do likewise, but the point is to see how great a thing it was that Abraham did, in order that man may judge for himself whether he has the call and the courage to be subjected to such a tesin order that man may judge for himself whether he has the call and the courage to be subjected to such a test.

hahaha, I'm pretty sure they'd find all the faults in my cooking if I were showing this to judges, but thankfully, the only judge in this case = my own tastebuds!

The criminal prosecutions spawned by the CityTime case reached a quiet denouement when a federal judge in Manhattan sentenced Carl Bell, a computer specialist at the center of the scheme, to three years» probation, showing leniency because he had given crucial help to investigators.

Another judge, Joan Madden, consolidated unrelated asbestos cases, which resulted in huge increases in jury verdicts — from an average of $ 7 million to $ 24 million per plaintiff between 2010 and 2014, data collected by Bates White Economic Consulting show.

As the DWP's most recent figures show, more than half of the cases where someone appealed against a decision judging them «fit for work» have resulted in the original decision being overturned.

Cuomo put on a good show — asking and answering his own hypotheticals, shouting to emphasize his seriousness — in claiming that he's doing the apolitical thing by handing the cases off to an independent counsel, retired state judge Judith Kaye.

An Albany County judge has dismissed the indictment of state Sen. Rob Ortt, R - Niagara County, in a case brought by Attorney General Eric Schneiderman over an alleged scheme to arrange a no - show job for Ortt's wife.

Before he was sentenced, Dean Skelos asked the judge in the case, Kimba M. Wood of Federal District Court in Manhattan, to show mercy to his son.

The brain scans allowed the researchers to compare unconscious with conscious responses and showed that a reward - judging region of the brain, the ventral palladium, became active in both cases.

The relationship between an athlete personal best in competition and back squat, bench press and power clean 1RM was determined via general linear model polynomial contrast analysis and regression for a group of 53 collegiate elite level throwers (24 males and 29 females); data analysis showed significant linear and quadratic trends for distance and 1RM power clean for both male (linear: p ≤ 0.001, quadratic: p ≤ 0.003) and female (linear: p ≤ 0.001, quadratic: p = 0.001) suggesting how the use of Olympic - style weightlifting movements — the clean, in this particular case, but more in general explosive, fast, athletic - like movements — can be a much better alternative for sport - specific testing for shot putters (Judge, et al, 2013).

In a season that is about the shoes, shading blocking them into an announcement comes simple, especially in case we're to judge in light of the incalculable blends seen strolling down the runways as the colorful showing can bring the stunning change in fashion, so a choice of brands is now these colorful shoeIn a season that is about the shoes, shading blocking them into an announcement comes simple, especially in case we're to judge in light of the incalculable blends seen strolling down the runways as the colorful showing can bring the stunning change in fashion, so a choice of brands is now these colorful shoein case we're to judge in light of the incalculable blends seen strolling down the runways as the colorful showing can bring the stunning change in fashion, so a choice of brands is now these colorful shoein light of the incalculable blends seen strolling down the runways as the colorful showing can bring the stunning change in fashion, so a choice of brands is now these colorful shoein fashion, so a choice of brands is now these colorful shoes.

There would be an easy case here for Haynes to judge and show contempt for Mildred, but thanks to a brilliant script and an absolutely tour - de-force turn by Winslet (she has the Emmy in the bag), what emerges is a complex woman whose unquenchable drive to give her daughter the American dream — while sheltering her from any ugliness that life has to offer — is also her greatest undoing.

Nevertheless, the judge said, the district and the minority plaintiffs in the long - running desegregation case had failed to show that the state took any actions to keep black and white children separate in the Yonkers schools.

«We believe the judge in this case did not take into consideration the overwhelming amount of evidence that show that these statutes work very well all over the state in well - run school districts,» said Frank Wells, a spokesman for the California Teachers Association.

Last week a panel of judges heard arguments in the state's appeal, and we pushed hard to show how critical it is that this case moves forward, and that these families have their day in court.

In that case, a judge also ruled the groups challenging the program could not show it harmed public schools.

Also on the show they regale you with tales of a few editorials done in the Wall Street Journal on judge involved in the Apple case and the court appointed monitor.

Apple's objections to its court - appointed antitrust monitor show exactly why the fruity firm needs an outsider keeping watch on its competition practices, the judge in the case has said.

If the contract clauses don't show Amazon's intentional strategy at sabotaging competitors and are only a well - thought safeguard, then the same train of thought used by the judge in the US case above can not be called on, mainly because Amazon has a much smaller piece of the eBook market share in Europe than it has in the US.

This was the same conclusion reached by the judge in the collusion case, whose reading of Big 5 CEO emails showed a willingness to erode Amazon's market share at any cost, even to themselves.

Unprejudiced and positive tests are therefore greatly needed, and these can only be found in show and trials under judges who have the common interest so keenly in view that they will allow neither friendship nor personal bias to control the awards; men who will bear ever in mind that upon their decision will greatly depend the future reputation of the animal in the stud, and who will therefore examine carefully each specimen before them, giving due credit to beauty and blood, but in all cases where possible requiring also performance were they pronounce a favorable verdict».

With this piece I wish to show the constant dialogue which occurs between self and society, in this case especially dealing with the continuing problem of being judged and categorized due to skin - colour.

Bigger is not necessarily better, but in this case the viewer can be the judge, interpreting and enjoying the impressive over-sized work in this show titled XXL.

In a rather unusual case, an Ontario Superior Court judge has set aside a default judgment that was obtained at an uncontested trial where the defendant intentionally decided not to show up.

It examines activity for five judges over the past five years, showing the percentage of cases in which each judge granted or denied summary judgment motions and the average days it takes each judge to decide a case.

Professor Zuckerman, in a seminar at Manchester on 3 July 2009 said the Court of Appeal should show «leadership» and «develop a coherent policy for enforcing compliance with rules and case management directions by judges and lawyers; non compliance, and dealing with it, being a waste of the court's resources in a public service system».

Nevertheless, as the analysis below will show, the Luxembourg judges, by addressing particularly technical issues of the agreement, provided a detailed set of guidelines that, if respected, would ideally preserve fundamental rights — in this case, the right to privacy and to data protection — without undermining public security.

[26] In a case such as this, the essence of the complaint is not that the reasons are functionally insufficient — the parties agree that on their face, the reasons explain what was decided and provide a basis for appellate review — but rather that the judge's wholesale incorporation of the material of others shows that he did not put his mind to the issues and decide them impartially.

Although I'm not going to weigh in on the legal issues in Doré v. Barreau du Québec, 2012 SCC 12, the more interesting issue for me is how wound up lawyers (and judges) can get, as shown by the following passages from this case.

In giving a pass to dishonest employees, this case forced judges and arbitrators in summary dismissal cases today to conclude that the misconduct must show that «the employment relationship could no longer viably subsist.&raquIn giving a pass to dishonest employees, this case forced judges and arbitrators in summary dismissal cases today to conclude that the misconduct must show that «the employment relationship could no longer viably subsist.&raquin summary dismissal cases today to conclude that the misconduct must show that «the employment relationship could no longer viably subsist.»

When you show a judge that the legislature has weighed in on your issue, or an appellate court has ruled your way in a similar case, then you're probably going to win the day.

«Logic vs. nitpicking»: The Pittsburgh Tribune - Review today contains an editorial that begins, «The Philip Morris case shows the allegedly best judges in the land shunning logic in favor of nitpicking.»

Traditional legal analytics show how often parties or law firms win cases, or the likelihood of winning legal relief in front of a particular judge.

In many cases (likely nearly all cases), if you show up in court and provide documents that your insurance is current, and was current at the time the ticket was issued, the judge (or the prosecutor) will likely dismiss the case with no penaltieIn many cases (likely nearly all cases), if you show up in court and provide documents that your insurance is current, and was current at the time the ticket was issued, the judge (or the prosecutor) will likely dismiss the case with no penaltiein court and provide documents that your insurance is current, and was current at the time the ticket was issued, the judge (or the prosecutor) will likely dismiss the case with no penalties.

A simple search of published court decisions shows that Wikipedia is frequently cited by judges around the country, involving serious issues and the bizarre — such as a 2005 tax case before the Tennessee Court of Appeals concerning the definition of «beverage» that involved hundreds of thousands of dollars, and, just this week, a case in Federal District Court in Florida that involved the term «booty music» as played during a wet T - shirt contest.

It followed, according to the judge, that the payments stood to be set off against the claim unless the claimant could show that either payment fell within one of the common law exceptions to deductibility in personal injury cases.

In a relatively rare consideration of the impact of Art 8 upon financial provision, Peter Hughes QC sitting as a deputy High Court judge in M v M [2006] All ER (D) 58 (Jun) considered the impact of an application for disclosure from a third party and set out some useful guidance on the basis that Art 8 reinforced the principle that an order for disclosure was an intrusion into an individual's privacy that was oppressive and unwarranted unless it could be shown to be both necessary and proportionate to the issues in the casIn a relatively rare consideration of the impact of Art 8 upon financial provision, Peter Hughes QC sitting as a deputy High Court judge in M v M [2006] All ER (D) 58 (Jun) considered the impact of an application for disclosure from a third party and set out some useful guidance on the basis that Art 8 reinforced the principle that an order for disclosure was an intrusion into an individual's privacy that was oppressive and unwarranted unless it could be shown to be both necessary and proportionate to the issues in the casin M v M [2006] All ER (D) 58 (Jun) considered the impact of an application for disclosure from a third party and set out some useful guidance on the basis that Art 8 reinforced the principle that an order for disclosure was an intrusion into an individual's privacy that was oppressive and unwarranted unless it could be shown to be both necessary and proportionate to the issues in the casin the case.

If we want judges who show insight, courage and forthrightness in difficult cases, we don't find them through this process, although this doesn't mean they might not slip through by careful staging.

If we assume the Crown's lawyer put in the Crown's best case, then there was nothing the trial judge said that the Crown lawyer (s) shouldn't have spotted as soon as the file showed up on the desk of the first lawyer who had the file.

First up, a New York judge has recused himself in the case of Floyd v. Cosi, a discrimination suit in which a former employee alleged Cosi showed bias against Floyd's race, age and disability in firing him from the restaurant chain.

Show the judge the evidence that supports your case by pointing out where the evidence is in the affidavits in the petition record (use the tab numbers and page numbers to help the judge find the documents).

«In this case the judge felt what was crucial was the brand and this brand had been completely devalued in the Quebec market and franchisees had very little to show for their investment.&raquIn this case the judge felt what was crucial was the brand and this brand had been completely devalued in the Quebec market and franchisees had very little to show for their investment.&raquin the Quebec market and franchisees had very little to show for their investment.»

Or you could show that the logical extension of your opponent's cited case would create absurd results, as Judge Frank Easterbrook did in Kissinger v. Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press.

That was the part where, after the parties agreed to, say, a $ 25 million settlement and submitted it for court approval, the plaintiffs» law firm (which to date had shown nothing but 100 percent confidence in its case) must now turn around and argue against its own case to show the judge that it had not settled the case for too little.

In that case the judge had to show that he had taken into account the factors indicated in Pts 44.3 (4) and (5), to the extent relevant to the case in hanIn that case the judge had to show that he had taken into account the factors indicated in Pts 44.3 (4) and (5), to the extent relevant to the case in hanin Pts 44.3 (4) and (5), to the extent relevant to the case in hanin hand.

Here is a table that shows (a) the number of times each judge has been involved in a case, and (b) the number of times that judge wrote (or co-wrote) a decision in the case:

Now, as a user is looking at a case in Lexis Advance, if the judge's name shows an active link, the user can click on that to access summary analytics about the judge from Lex Machina.