In a trial,
a judge makes a judgment.
The court decision is unfortunately not reasonable, and obviously,
the judge made his judgment based on his personal sympathy to the plaintiff, who was disabled after the accident.
Not exact matches
«Relative deprivation is an idea that says that when we
make judgments about ourselves, we
judge ourselves next to our immediate peers — people like us in the same room as us — not to the world at large,» Gladwell said in a recent interview with author Daniel H. Pink.
«I'm an attorney and like to wait until I have the evidence before I
make any kind of snap
judgment and I reserve my right to wait to
judge this,» said Parkland Commissioner Ken Cutler.
Judging souls is God's judgment to make; it is not for us sinners to do soul j
Judging souls is God's
judgment to
make; it is not for us sinners to do soul
judgingjudging.
This verse mirrors Jesus» warning about
judgment in verse 2: «For with the
judgment you
make you will be
judged, and the measure you give will be the measure you get.»
«Jesus also taught that we should not
judge other people (Matthew 7:1), and that it is God who
judges people, so I am willing to let God
make those
judgments, in the ultimate time whenever it might come.
But I would call a
judge a murderer if he
made a
judgment against wicked evil people which resulted in a bunch of children getting killed along with the wicked people.
Even Jesus, who
made the statement «
judge not, lest you be
judged,» praises Peter a few paragraphs later for
making a correct
judgment (Luke 7:42 - 43).
Even at the ultimate
judgment, Jesus
makes the standard for
judging the nations quite clear:
You have
made a
judgment that the teaching (theology is
judged) is done wrong by a person (the person is
judged - ie - said to be wrong).
For to
judge by the outcome (whereby an attempt is
made to unite a
judgment of temporal existence and of eternity into a
judgment that comes after the event is past) is not humanly possible in the instant that a man himself acts, nor is it possible in the instant when others act.
6:12); «With the
judgment you
make you will be
judged» (Matt.
(1) When the transcendent self
makes a choice it requires and demands a transcendent norm above itself: this norm is God.27 (2) The image - of - God doctrine implies that man has a capacity for religious
judgments, an ability to
judge false gods.
People have to look at from where a nation is coming from and moving towards rather than
judge where they are at present — if you took a snapshot of countries like the USA around 1865 - 1880 or during the race riots or peace marches of the 60's you'd come away with a view of America as being an oppressive country (at least in the south)-- there is not a single thing happening in China that hasn't happened in the US or Britain as well your just looking at a single timeline while
making a
judgment.
LOL they have
made thmselves
judges of us all... and it is time for them to be
judged so that they might repent before the great
judgment when there is no repentance... This I would be glad to do... but for the finances required...
But, what The Lord Jesus Christ is telling us in this passage is a CAVEAT a CAUTIONARY instruction to «not
judge» unfairly, unjustly or
make «unclean»
judgments (i.e., being guilty of your own mess).
So God
judges them, and says that although they are «sons of God,» that is, although He has given some of His authority to them to
make judgments, they will still die like mere men (82:7).
Hence if the Moment is to have decisive significance — and if not we speak Socratically whatever we may say, even if through not even understanding ourselves we imagine that we have advanced far beyond that simple man of wisdom who divided
judgment incorruptibly between the God and man and himself, a
judge more just than Minos, Aeacus and Rhadamanthus — if the Moment has decisive significance the breach is
made, and man can not return.
The dudes and dudettes at SCOTUS
make a big deal of it... «1Cr 6:4 If then ye have
judgments of things pertaining to this life, set them to
judge who are least esteemed in the church.»
Now when the guilty are so numerous it is not humanly possible to do this, therefore one must give the whole thing up, one perceives that there can be no question of any
judgment, they are too numerous to be
judged, one can not
make them or in any way manage to
make them individuals, so one must give up holding
judgment.
Francis does not require a jury to pass a
judgment about his capabilities, because in his trade there is only one
judge to
make those decisions who is his manager.
I am comfortable with the
judgments I have
made and the decisions / choices that have extended out from them, even if they are ones others would not
make and would
judge in a different manner than I do or even if they are ones I would change in retrospect.
I admitted to my childless friend that I was nervous they were all
judging me for formula - feeding and in her typically honest fashion, she admitted that if she didn't know me, she'd probably be
making similar assumptions and
judgments about my parenting too.
But, when a machine is involved in
making these
judgments, they are going to have many many potential points of reference, and algorithms create a situation where you don't really know precisely what is being
judged or what has been put into the system.
The two, Alistair Nelson and Godwin Ako Gunn, allegedly threatened to «finish» the Supreme Court
judges if they
made any
judgment against the Electoral Commission in the ongoing court case challenging the validity of the voters» register.
Judge Kaye found that Governor Paterson and his advisers had
made errors of
judgment in their handling of the case, but that their actions had not been criminal.
«Hence, they seemed to
judge by appearance when they were forced to
make their
judgments quickly,» Rule says.
The key is witnessing the
judgment without more
judgment because witnessing or acknowledging your
judgment can
make you want to
judge yourself for
judging!
Now that online dating is commonplace, we're often forced to
judge based on a fixed image - and not only that, but given the speed at which many singles flip through profiles, we also have to
make those
judgments more rapidly.
The case involved three school districts by name, LA Unified, Oakland Unified School District and Alum Rock Union, and the
judges specifically mentioned former LA Superintendent John Deasy when discussing the amount of time it takes to re-evaluate a teacher on probation: «One witness, John Deasy, then - superintendent of LAUSD, testified that there is «no way» the time provided by the statute is «a sufficient amount of time to
make... that incredibly important
judgment» of reelection.»
Teachers
make value
judgments about technologies presented to them, and the more valuable they
judge a tool to be, the more likely they are to use it (Ertmer & Ottenbreit - Leftwich, 2010).
As important as the advice, «don't
judge a book by its cover,» is for not
making quick
judgments, that doesn't mean that all your potential readers are following it.
O. Any final and definitive decision of an administrative law
judge, or in the case such decision is appealed, a final and definitive
judgment of an appellate court, issued in connection with any hearing held pursuant to this Chapter and the Administrative Procedure Act shall be considered a valid and final
judgment that may be
made executory by the commissioner in accordance with the Code of Civil Procedure.
In the New York suit, Sperone Westwater asked the
judge to
make a declaratory
judgment that the archive has no moral rights claims and also seeks damages «for the Defendants» injuries to the gallery's business and reputation,» on counts of breach of implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, negligent misrepresentation, and interference with business relations.
Even if they disagreed about it,
judges can and do
make judgments on cases where technical evidence is presented.
The journal editor assigns the manuscript review to two or three reviewers (other scientists who should have the technical expertise to
judge the work) and the reviewers try to pick apart the arguments that the authors are trying to put forward and give a
judgment as to whether the article is publishable or not (or could be improved to
make it publishable).
Judges are required to
make judgments.
One thing I don't understand is why it follows that no organization, if it
judges the IPCC reports to be largely, mostly, or entirely accurate, shouldn't
make that
judgment public.
Dr. Curry quotes Feynman: «If you
make a theory, for example, and advertise it, or put it out, then you must also put down all the facts that disagree with it, as well as those that agree with it... In summary, the idea is to try to give all of the information to help others to
judge the value of your contribution; not just the information that leads to
judgment in one particular direction or another.»
In a short
judgment (concerned with the extent to which courts were bound by Privy Council decisions) Lord Neuberger said: «In a common law system, where the law is in some areas
made, and the law is in virtually all areas developed, by
judges, the doctrine of precedent, or as it is sometimes known stare decisis, is fundamental.
However, the Court of Appeal, with Lady Justice Arden giving the
judgment, rejected MGN's argument that the
judge had
made no finding, as required by CPR 36.17 (3), that it would be «unjust» for the normal consequences of failing to beat an offer to apply.
Instead, the case dragged on for two years; the docket sheet has around 80 entries; both sides hired computer experts, and in the end the case was dismissed on summary
judgment, in a decision where the
judge spent almost 40 pages analyzing every claim
made by Healthcare and dismissing it only after rigorous and in - depth analysis which went, in my opinion, far beyond the call of duty.
This
judgment brings the BVI back into line with many other countries which
make no automatic distinction between the location of the
judgment, but rather leave that to be considered in the
Judge's discretion on the enforcement application itself.
Such rules of civil practice include guidelines as to the type of information that is acceptable by a jury or
judge, the method of presentation of the information, and by what standards of proof a
judgment will be
made based on the information.
This article argues that it is time for the SCSL to establish an independent fact finding commission, with a narrowly framed and time limited mandate, to establish the truth, or falsity, of the allegation that Alternate
Judge Sow
made during the delivery of the Taylor Trial
judgment that there were no (serious) deliberations by the three
judges who convicted the accused and sentenced him to 50 years imprisonment.
One
judge noted that he was well aware that some attorneys
make frequent emergency requests, some even gaining the reputation for waiting until Friday afternoon to
make the request, but that he couldn't let this affect his
judgment.
By order dated July 14, 2014, the motion
judge, the Honourable Justice Martin S. James of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice sitting at Ottawa, granted Mr. Arnone's motion for summary
judgment and ordered Best Theratronics to pay (i) damages equal to the gross amount of the salary Arnone would have earned until he qualified for an unreduced pension, less payments
made to him to satisfy the statutory obligations of the employer, (ii) $ 65,000 representing the present value of the loss of an unreduced pension, (iii) a retirement allowance equal to 30 weeks» pay, and (iv) costs totaling $ 52,280.09.
He states that» [a] n individual
judge who imposes a sentence within the range recommended by the Guidelines thus
makes a decision that is fully consistent with the Commission's
judgment in general.»
In doing so, he said he felt comfortable falling in line with one judicial line of thought that says
judges can
make findings of fact in order to grant summary
judgment.