Sentences with phrase «judge of the superior court»

The two on June 29, spewed threats of death to Judges of the superior court in the case involving the Electoral Commission and Mr Abu Ramadan.

Section 520 clearly envisions more than one opportunity to bring a bail review application and contemplates that different judges of the superior court will sometimes hear these applications.

(i) A judge of a superior court may order the return of the deposit prior to the expiration of two years upon evidence satisfactory to the judge that there are no outstanding claims against the deposit or order the Secretary of State to retain the deposit for a sufficient period beyond the two years specified in subdivision (g) to resolve outstanding claims against the deposit account.

Section 96 of the Constitution Act, 1867 provides that judges of the superior courts shall be appointed by the Governor General.

Judges of the superior courts (Courts of Appeal, Supreme Courts and Courts of Queen's Bench) are governed by the Canadian Judicial Council.

Any person may be appointed a judge who is or has been a judge of a superior court of a province or a barrister or advocate of at least ten years standing at the bar of a province.

Section 5 (1) referred to in the Bill says that «Any person may be appointed a judge who is or has been a judge of a superior court of a province or a barrister or advocate of at least ten years standing at the bar of a province.»

I think each of the expressions means that a judge of a superior court is protected when he is acting in the bona fide exercise of his office and under the belief that he has jurisdiction, though he may be mistaken in that belief and may not in truth have any jurisdiction.

A judge of a superior court is not liable for anything done by him while he is «acting as a judge,» or «doing a judicial act» or «acting judicially» or «in the execution of his office»... «What do all these mean?

«What is the test upon which the judges of the superior courts are thus immune from liability for damages even though they are acting without jurisdiction?

A.R.S. § 36 - 2152, enacted in 2001, prohibits any physician from performing an abortion on an unemancipated minor without the written consent of one of the minor's parents or her guardian or conservator, or unless a judge of the superior court authorizes the physician to perform the abortion pursuant to prescribed procedures.

487.01 (1) A provincial court judge, a judge of a superior court of criminal jurisdiction or a judge as defined in section 552 may issue a warrant in writing authorizing a peace officer to, subject to this section, use any device or investigative technique or procedure or do any thing described in the warrant that would, if not authorized, constitute an unreasonable search or seizure in respect of a person or a person's property if

Section 96 of the Constitution Act, 1867 seems innocuous — an «uninstructed reading of the section itself» reveals little [1]-- providing simply that judges of the superior courts (and the now defunct -LSB-...] Read more

On its face, s. 96 merely provides that the federal government is responsible or appointing the judges of superior courts.

(15) Where anything is detained pursuant to subsections (1) to (3.1), a judge of a superior court of criminal jurisdiction, a judge as defined in section 552 or a provincial court judge may, on summary application on behalf of a person who has an interest in what is detained, after three clear days notice to the Attorney General, order that the person by or on whose behalf the application is made be permitted to examine anything so detained.

Justice Ecker has been a judge of the superior court since 2014.

The Supreme Court Act requires that «[a] ny person may be appointed a judge who is or has been a judge of a superior court of a province or a barrister or advocate of at least ten years standing at the bar of a province.»

(1) Subject to subsection (2) of this section, the judges of the superior courts shall hold office during good behaviour, but shall be removable by the Governor General on address of the Senate and House of Commons.

Section 5 can be «corrected» (if the intention is otherwise) by adding «who is» so that it says «who is or has been a judge of superior court of a province or who is a barrister or advocate of at least ten years standing at the bar of a province.»

I understand that Justice Nadon is not and never has been a «a judge of a superior court» or a judge of the Court of Appeal, and that he is not now an advocate in Quebec.