Sentences with phrase «judge or jury find»

If the judge or jury find you not guilty of the traffic charges, congrats!

If the SC judge or jury find you guilty, the penalties you'll face will depend on the severity of your convictions, and could be any of the following:

If the judge or jury find you not guilty of the traffic violation (s) you can look forward to the following:

A judge or jury found for the plaintiff in about half of tort trials concluded in U.S. district courts during 2002 - 2003.

If the judge or jury finds that you're not at fault in the accident, you can use this as leverage to convince your company not to hike your rates.

If the judge or the jury finds you guilty of the WI traffic violation, you will be required to pay the original traffic fine, as well as any additional court - set costs.

Not exact matches

Winners are found this way: First, the Product of the Year Canada jury carefully selects the finalists — that is, products that meet or exceed innovation standards — which are then categorized and judged by an online survey, on behalf of Rogers Insights and conducted by TNS, of thousands of regular Canadian shoppers.

In a ruling Friday night, U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack rejected the motion, finding that while some of the questions and answers were either inappropriate or «potentially inappropriate,» they and others like them would be barred from jury deliberations.

Most judges and juries are not persuaded by neurobiological evidence used to argue that a defendant was not fully responsible for his or her actions, as in Gunther's case, the analysis found.

Just like in a court of law, an attorney could never guarantee a client that the judge or jury would find in their favor.

This is partly evidenced by the fact once the option is selected, a piece of paper is produced that claims that you've appeared, pleaded no - contest and waived your right to a judge or a jury trial, at which point you're found guilty, with a deferred judgment, and with the option of case dismissal should certain conditions be satisfied.

As long as the sentence is not such that, without some evidence the judge found but the jury did not, it is outside the range specified by statute, can't the judge pretty much sentence however he wants, whether he wants to be a hardass or skeptic regarding the Guidelines?

An attorney can help accident victims find and present expert witnesses to testify in front of a judge or jury.

Here, the jury had not yet been sworn, and therefore, the judge had no duty to hold a hearing or find an extreme hardship.

A judge or jury might find the driver of the second vehicle to be partially at fault for the accident and assign a percentage of fault to that comparatively negligent driver.

But, without some finding of fault by the judge or jury in the Circuit Court, we would have to attribute to the Supreme Court of Florida from the quoted language not merely an intention to affirm the finding of the lower court, but an intention to find such a fact in the first instance.

For instance, if the jury or a judge finds that the plaintiff was 20 % negligent in the accident or incident out of which the injuries arose, and the total damages were $ 100,000, then the defendant would only have to pay the defendant $ 80,000.

While the facts were not in dispute, the trial judge found that since he did not go through with his threats to hand out circulars or hang a jury, he did not actually commit the offence of obstructing justice.

My understanding of American law is that no defamation occurs if the «sting» of the actual facts (as found by the judge or jury) is greater than the sting of the false allegations.

That means being honest with the judge, opposing counsel, oftentimes the insurance company representative (which I have found is always the person behind the scenes controlling the money decisions and is the reason the case is going to trial; the powerful decision - maker who the judge and jury never meet or even get to know about), and most importantly, the jury.

Based on the answers given by the interviewees, the judge may excuse those individuals he or she finds unsuitable to serve on the jury.

Of course, I don't really know what a judge or jury will find legal or illegal, but at least you should be able to find an expert witness to explain that GOODFILE does or does not contain the contents of BADFILE.

Both in the «solemn» and the «summary» acquittals, not proven is interpreted as indicating that the jury or judge, respectively, is not convinced of the innocence of the accused; in fact, they may be morally or even factually convinced that the accused is guilty, but do not find the proofs sufficient for a conviction under the elements of the crime on the jury instruction / verdict form.

In this six - week jury trial, the trial judge refused to dismiss at least three jurors who were related to or knew members of the plaintiff class, and the jury found in favor of the plaintiff class.

HB 1270 AS AMENDED: Provides judges must give precisely worded jury nullification instruction: «If you have a reasonable doubt as to whether the state has proved any one or more of the elements of the crime charged, you must find the defendant not guilty.

If we find that you will be best served by taking your case to trial, we will aggressively advocate your position before a Judge or jury.

Remember the standard of proof to find anyone guilty of a criminal offence in Canada is proof «beyond reasonable doubt», meaning the judge or the jury must be convinced that the criminal offence occurred and no one should lightly guess.

Thus, the trial judge properly charged the jury that they could not convict if they found that petitioners did «no more than pursue peaceful studies and discussions or teaching and advocacy in the realm of ideas.»

If one or more of the parties is found at fault, the judge or jury can divide up liability based on the degree of each party's fault.

I would argue that the combination of these two outcomes related to design patents doesn't make sense, but Apple's smartphone design patent case is strong enough that a jury can find that way, and the tablet design patent case is so strong that Apple may very well get the jury overruled either by Judge Koh or on appeal.

Finding a Lawyer That Has Experience Defending Cases Similar to Yours When you are sitting in front of a judge or jury, you are basically looking to these people to make decisions that are going to affect your life.

Or, the judge may simply tell the jury, «You may listen to these two songs, and find the defendant liable if you find them to be substantially similar to the extent that it is more likely than not that the defendant copied the plaintiff.»

A judge or jury may find that each party in a lawsuit contributed to the problem.

After hearing all of the evidence, and after listening to both lawyers explain their side's view of the evidence, the judge or jury makes a finding based upon what they have heard and considered.

The vast majority of respondents from jurisdictions comprising a jury system found it unacceptable for jurors to post comments or opinions about the judges, lawyers, parties, and / or cases which they are observing on online social networking sites.

The trial judge also found that there was no compelling reason not to use the language in Clements and that the phrase «cause or contributed to» proposed by the plaintiffs would confuse the jury.

There are two concerns here: first, whether or not the Court of Appeal is substituting their opinion when the trial judge, who was present at the trial, decided otherwise and second, whether or not the jury made their decision based on something other than provocation, which would make the manslaughter finding appropriate.

In layperson's terms, this means that the judge finds there is no real issue of fact or law and rules in favor of the carrier without the case ever going before a jury.

If you are found guilty by either the judge or jury, the penalty will be announced at that time.

Under the court of law, if driver will plead guilty or will be found guilty with the crime by the judge or jury, he will then be bought to face a judge who will assess him with criminal penalties for committing the crime.

An arrest record is much different than a conviction, which is when a judge and / or jury found the subject guilty of the crime or the subject plead guilty.