Sentences with phrase «judge ordered review»

The trial judge ordered review after 15 months.

Not exact matches

UPDATE, 4:25 pm EST: A different New York judge has granted DraftKings and FanDuel an «emergency stay» of the injunction order; it means the companies can, for now, continue to operate in New York until an appellate panel reviews the injunction on January 4.

At a hearing Monday in U.S. District Court in New York, Judge Kimba Wood denied Cohen's request for a temporary restraining order to block the investigators from reviewing the materials seized from Cohen's temporary residence and two office spaces during a raid last week.

WASHINGTON (Reuters)- A federal judge ordered the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to reconsider its environmental review of the Dakota Access Pipeline on Wednesday, opening up the possibility that the line could be shut at a later date.

Update: The government has asked for an expedited review, as ordered by Judge Vinson.

Even so, we believe strongly that Judge Doty's order is incorrect and fundamentally at odds with well - established legal precedent governing the district court's role in reviewing arbitration decisions.

If you do reach an agreement, the judge will review it and make it a court order if he or she agrees that it's in the best interests of the child.

Chief Judge Janet DiFiore ordered the investigation «immediately following the revelation of David Bookstaver's conduct,» which will include «a review as to whether Mr. Bookstaver's behavior warranted a criminal referral for prosecution or other action,» said OCA spokesman Lucian Chalfen.

Noting some of the developer's construction deadlines could stretch until 2035, the judge faulted the Empire State Development Corporation for using a 10 - year timeline, She ordered more «findings» or reviews of the so - called modified general project plan, which is the master plan for the site.

The licensee is entitled to an expedited administrative law hearing before an administrative law judge, the release said, and an order of summary suspension remains in effect until it is modified by the liquor authority or a reviewing court.

In 2015, a state judge ordered the Civilian Complaint Review Board to release any substantiated misconduct allegations against Pantaleo, but the city is appealing that ruling.

A federal bankruptcy judge has ordered Suffolk County and Brookhaven Town to review and possibly approve a proposed video lottery casino in Medford that Suffolk Regional Off Track Betting Corp. considers key to emerging from bankruptcy.

Last Wednesday, New York Supreme Court Judge Arthur M. Diamond ordered all contested ballots be preserved and scheduled a follow - up court hearing for this Wednesday after Lally's campaign filed a lawsuit seeking to consolidate the disputed ballot process from three judges reviewing each county's ballots, to one jJudge Arthur M. Diamond ordered all contested ballots be preserved and scheduled a follow - up court hearing for this Wednesday after Lally's campaign filed a lawsuit seeking to consolidate the disputed ballot process from three judges reviewing each county's ballots, to one judgejudge.

In light of the ruling, Gov. Rick Scott's administration — which has expressed concerns with how Broward County Election Supervisor Brenda Snipes has handled the case — told POLITICO that he's reviewing the judge's order and will have her office monitored.

The Legal Aid Society sought a summary of of Officer Daniel Pantaleo's disciplinary file from the Civilian Complaint Review Board, and after a judge ordered it be released, the city appealed.

U.S. Bankruptcy Court Judge Carla E. Craig released a decision on Nov. 30 ordering the county and town to accept and review plans for the controversial facility.

Provisions in the bill include increasing the penalty for a repeat offense to a felony; allowing judges to consider risk factors such as firearm possession and violations of restraining orders in determining bail; and establishing a statewide Fatality Review Team to find new ways to prevent intimate partner homicides.

Today Develop Don't Destroy Brooklyn announced that state Supreme Court Judge Marcy Friedman has ordered the Empire State Development Corp. to conduct additional environmental review of the project, including a Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement.

Robinson withdrew his threat to resign, after David Cameron ordered a judge - led review of the issue.

The novel order, issued last month by a state judge in California, has alarmed some publishers, who fear it could deter scientists from agreeing to review draft manuscripts.

Research on embryonic stem cells funded by the U.S. government must stop immediately for a court - ordered review, Judge Royce Lamberth of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia ruled today.

Facing a court - ordered 60 - day review to determine who'll get the pooch, Olive and Clay try their doggone best to win over the judge in this romantic comedy about what happens when puppy love goes to the dogs.

DVD Review by Kam Williams Headline: DVD Examines Still Segregated Mardi Gras Celebrations in Alabama Judging from The Order of Myths, recent pronunciations of America as a post-racial society are a bit premature.

The administrative law judge shall make recommendations in accordance with the provisions of subsection (7) to the appropriate Education Practices Commission panel which shall conduct a formal review of such recommendations and other pertinent information and issue a final order.

Jennifer Canada, a spokeswoman for Attorney General Roy Cooper, said his office would review the judge's written order before deciding whether to appeal.

A state district judge Tuesday ordered Houston's city secretary to finish reviewing firefighters» petition seeking pay parity with police, giving her until April 27 to verify the eight - month - old...

The review score and pricing, though... Those two things need separation in order to judge a game fairly.

A Southern District of New York judge quashed supoeonas seeking to produce the confidential notes, but on Thursday the New York - based 2nd Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals in a summary order instructed the trial court to conduct an en camera review of the mediator's notes.

The decision might seem harsher still, since it is an example of an appellate judge who reviews a discretion - based decision of the judge below, and concludes that he would not have made the variation order himself, at first instance; but upholds the decisions and, correctly, dismisses the appeal, because it can not be said that the district judge was wrong or that his decision was outside the range of discretionary decisions that was properly open to him.

The court stated by way of introduction that, «the issue of the standard of review applicable to orders of both judges and prothonotaries has been one of the most contentious issues before our Court and before all courts of appeal, including before the Supreme Court of Canada, in the last 10 to 15 years.»

However, the Provincial Court Judges» Association of B.C. won a judicial review ordering the government to reconsider.

In another Court of Appeal decision called Catsoudas v. Catsoudas, the appeal court was asked to review the trial judge's order — which was given without any articulated reasons — to the effect that the husband should pay $ 1,000 per month to the wife.

Sole custody orders issued by an Arizona judge may be appealed to the Arizona Court of Appeals, which will review the case to determine if there were apparent errors in interpreting the law -LSB-...]

It was an informative gathering with lively roundtable discussions amongst peers on interesting e-discovery topics such as: judges ordering the use of predictive coding, indexing data by concepts, the practicality of co-operation and disclosure of predictive coding to opposing counsel, whether it's possible to conduct privilege reviews using predictive coding and even securing executive buy - in for «spring cleaning» data remediation projects.

The 2003 version of Family Proceedings Rules 1991, r 8.1 (3) requires that the judge, as appellate tribunal, «be limited to a review of the decision or order of the district judge», save where the «judge considers that... it would be in the interests of justice to hold a rehearing» — as happened, for example in R v R (Lump Sum Repayments)[2003] EWHC 3197 (Fam), [2004] 1 FLR 928, where Mr Justice Wilson (as he then was) decided that the evidence before the district judge needed to be revisited by him.

In reviewing the trial judge's order, the Court of Appeals took offense at the comment, feeling that the trial court had unfairly lashed out at the appellate judges because precedent precluded the judge from resolving the case as he saw fit.

«Instead of carefully reviewing the evidence in the case in order to determine whether or not the Crown had, in fact, established that the appellant possessed the specific intent of wilfulness required by s. 173 (1) of the Criminal Code, the trial judge erroneously convicted the appellant based upon a perceived (but non-existent) legal presumption that the necessary wilfulness was established by the fact that his acts of masturbation were in fact witnessed by another,» he wrote.

The promise doctrine was developed through the Federal Courts» jurisprudence; under it, a judge reviewed a patent as a whole to identify any «promises» made in it, then assessed whether those promises had been met in order to satisfy the utility requirement of the patent under the Patent Act.

At the review, the Judge will determine what, if any, further order is granted.

As a Crown Attorney I found it incredibly time - consuming and often frustrating to have to review these tapes in order to prepare for an appeal, and I'm sure judges found it an equally vexing process.»

Sole custody orders issued by an Arizona judge may be appealed to the Arizona Court of Appeals, which will review the case to determine if there were apparent errors in interpreting the law in regards to the situation at hand or a trial judge's abuse of his or her discretion.

The trend towards judicial acceptance of predictive coding and other forms of technology assisted review (TAR) has continued, to the point where it is now newsworthy when a judge declines to order TAR.

However there is something that could be done to ameliorate the due process issues from how temporary hearings are currently conducted: authorize automatic de novo review [a review in which the temporary order has no binding effect] of custody and support orders 90 - 180 days after the temporary hearing, ideally with the same judge conducting the review.

In the Redknapp case, although production orders under s 345 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 and special procedure search warrants under PACE 1984, s 9 had previously been granted by a Crown Court judge, it was a warrant under PACE 1984, s 8 that brought about the judicial review.

In dealing with the claimant's further request for an order that anyone who had read the privileged documents or was aware of their content should be removed from further involvement in the relevant FSA investigation, the judge held that, while the approach identified in the private law context to the question whether a lawyer in possession of privileged material should be restrained from acting is a useful guide, when the question arises in judicial review proceedings there will necessarily be a public law element in the underlying dispute.

(2) It is true that the judge stayed her order to allow for judicial review proceedings, but that amounted to an acknowledgement that the resources of the family court were exhausted, when they were not.

As part of the Supreme Court's August 27, 2014 Administrative Order revising implementation of the 365 day rule, «In the event no request for a final hearing is received by the Clerk of Court within the time period prescribed and there is no other order by the Chief Administrative Judge extending the case, the Clerk of Court shall prepare an Order of Dismissal without prejudice and provide the order and file for review by the Chief Administrative Judge.&rOrder revising implementation of the 365 day rule, «In the event no request for a final hearing is received by the Clerk of Court within the time period prescribed and there is no other order by the Chief Administrative Judge extending the case, the Clerk of Court shall prepare an Order of Dismissal without prejudice and provide the order and file for review by the Chief Administrative Judge.&rorder by the Chief Administrative Judge extending the case, the Clerk of Court shall prepare an Order of Dismissal without prejudice and provide the order and file for review by the Chief Administrative Judge.&rOrder of Dismissal without prejudice and provide the order and file for review by the Chief Administrative Judge.&rorder and file for review by the Chief Administrative Judge.»

Himonas notably spared Rosenberg the 60 - month smartphone ban and the mandatory video review ordered by Judge Carton, however.

The Court of Appeal for British Columbia has dismissed an application asking for a rare order that a trial judge provide a report on his reasons for conviction of a man for dangerous driving causing death, just because he erred in saying «right» when it should have been «left» in his review of the evidence.

A master's interim order is subject to review by a higher judicial authority, like a Supreme Court judge.