Sentences with phrase «judge orders an arrangement»

In many cases, the judge orders an arrangement that combines two or more types of custody.

Not exact matches

But even identifying these two very consequent decisions does not explain how in Lutheranism, of all places, the authority of Scripture could be so undermined and why in Lutheranism, with its strong theology of God's orders of creation and preservation, anyone could hope to get away with proposing that sexual arrangements be judged on quality not kind.

If parents agree to joint custody and ask for it, the arrangement will almost certainly be granted, but if the judge finds that this isn't in the best interests of the child for some reason, he can decline the request and order a different custody arrangement.

Judges must provide a strong reason if they wish to order some other arrangement; in some areas, judges have the authority to order shared parenting if they believe it would be best for the child, or if one parent requesJudges must provide a strong reason if they wish to order some other arrangement; in some areas, judges have the authority to order shared parenting if they believe it would be best for the child, or if one parent requesjudges have the authority to order shared parenting if they believe it would be best for the child, or if one parent requests it.

If one parent in a joint legal custody arrangement takes decision - making powers away from the other parent (perhaps by making unilateral decisions about a child's education), the other parent can go back to court to get a judge to enforce the joint legal custody order.

«From what I understand, if they report tomorrow morning, they will be taken to a Magistrate's Court and arraigned before a judge that will readily comply with the police arrangement and grant order for them to be detained,» the source said.

Judge Dan Polster of the Northern District of Ohio also ordered each lawyer to submit sworn affirmations that any funding arrangements do not «undermine counsel's obligation of vigorous advocacy» or give funders «control over litigation strategy or settlement decisions.»

The judge commented that «the fact that the defendant finds the arrangement costly or inconvenient does not begin to show that the implication of such a term is necessary in order to give the contract business efficacy».

The judge's child arrangements order was discharged for E and would terminate for J at 16.

The application judge ordered that the custody and access arrangements in existence at the time of trial pursuant to the earlier order of Judge MacKenzie of the Ontario Court of Justice should conjudge ordered that the custody and access arrangements in existence at the time of trial pursuant to the earlier order of Judge MacKenzie of the Ontario Court of Justice should conJudge MacKenzie of the Ontario Court of Justice should continue

When parents split, the parents or a judge will draft a custody order which sets forth daily visitation plans and other custodial arrangements.

The second is that where the court makes an express order requiring the parent with care to comply with contact arrangements, and that order is breached, then, in the interests of consistency, the judge must support the order by considering enforcement, either under the enforcement provisions in section 11J of the 1989 Child Act or by contempt proceedings.

When parents can not agree on parenting arrangements judges are now commonly ordering shared equal child parenting arrangements.

The application judge ordered that the custody and access arrangements in existence at the time of trial pursuant to the earlier order of Judge MacKenzie of the Ontario Court of Justice should continue and that a review of the orders in respect of custody and child support should take place after December 31, judge ordered that the custody and access arrangements in existence at the time of trial pursuant to the earlier order of Judge MacKenzie of the Ontario Court of Justice should continue and that a review of the orders in respect of custody and child support should take place after December 31, Judge MacKenzie of the Ontario Court of Justice should continue and that a review of the orders in respect of custody and child support should take place after December 31, 2012.

But days later, a California judge halted the order, the report continues, noting a hearing is scheduled later this month where the parenting arrangement will be evaluated.

The temporary orders will only be in effect until the final trial, during which the judge will make final rulings and establish the permanent custody arrangement.

The two primary types of legal custody, which is determined either by agreement between parents or by order of a judge, are joint legal custody, which is an arrangement where both parents share the rights to make the major decisions for their child, and sole legal custody, which is when one parent can make these decisions without input from the other parent.

However, either parent may prefer to obtain a court order from a Kentucky court because the court order allows for enforcement by a judge if the other parent has a change of heart or wants to change the arrangement.

The standard order is meant to provide a consistent arrangement that judges and lawyers know how to interpret.

Absent a joint custody agreement by the parents that includes an unequal physical custody arrangement, a judge is now required to order joint custody with an equal amount of parenting time, regardless of where the parent lives, unless one parent is ruled to be unfit.

When a court creates an order for child custody or visitation, the judge always seeks to create an arrangement that is in the child's best interests.

If parents request joint custody, Michigan judges are obligated to order it, unless some circumstance exists that would make such an arrangement harmful to the child.

However, because courts prefer continuity for kids in divorce situations, it's not uncommon for a judge to order temporary custody based on the de facto arrangement.

When the parents can not agree and end up litigating, the judge determines the custodial arrangement and it becomes part of the custody order.

If the substance abuse evaluator finds that addiction poses a threat to your child, the judge may enter a temporary or permanent order altering your custody arrangement.

Child support is based predominantly on the incomes of the parents, the number and ages of the children, and the amount of time the children will be spending with each parent based on the parenting plan to which the parties have agreed (i.e., their consensual custody arrangement) or the parenting plan ordered by a judge).

Interestingly, Judge Baer noted that in a frequently - ordered arrangement in which the non-custodial parent exercised partial custody every weekend and four weeks during summer vacation, the non-custodial parent would spend 132 days with the children.

Shared custody arrangements can be ordered by a judge or agreed to by the parents, and they may be structured in a variety of ways.

When the divorce is final, a judge will carry the terms of the temporary order over into a permanent order, or tweak the arrangement as required if it's not working out.

This doesn't mean, however, that no judge will ever order such an arrangement.

If a judge ordered your custody arrangement after a divorce trial and you disagree with his decision, you might be able to appeal the judgment.

On appeal, the mother sought to overturn the trial judge's order of a parallel parenting arrangement and the father sought to maintain it.

Section 61.13, Florida Statutes, lays out twenty factors to help a judge determine a child's best interest when ordering custody arrangements, including the following pertinent factors:

You can't submit new evidence in an appeal — you can only argue the judge misinterpreted the law or circumstances of your case when he ordered your custody arrangement.

If a joint custody agreement is not reached, a Connecticut judge may order a sole custody arrangement.

A physical custody arrangement where parents share equal parenting time will be ordered by a Kansas judge if parents are in agreement with that arrangement.

If parents agree to joint custody and ask for it, the arrangement will almost certainly be granted, but if the judge finds that this isn't in the best interests of the child for some reason, he can decline the request and order a different custody arrangement.

If joint legal or physical custody is not a good fit for a family, a judge will order a different type of arrangement.

At the first hearing, the judge can order you to attend mediation to try to work out a new custody arrangement on your own.

Understanding what physical custody is and why it is ordered by Maryland judges can help parents decide which type of parenting arrangement to pursue.

If you can't satisfy New Jersey's criteria for joint custody, this doesn't rule out shared custody, and New Jersey judges are much more willing to order this type of arrangement.

Courts can order a temporary arrangement pending your divorce, and the state's code includes specific provisions to help guide a judge when custody is hotly contested.

Before a New Jersey court will order joint custody, the judge must find that a variety of factors are conducive to the arrangement.

A family court judge is not likely to order a joint physical custody arrangement when parents live in separate states, and with good reason.

If one parent rents a two - bedroom apartment with a roommate, it's not likely a New Jersey judge will order a joint custody arrangement.

Consequently, many couples enter into joint custody arrangements and judges frequently order joint custody.

Finally, this information about family dysfunctions in marital dissolution should be widespread to the family court judges in order to decide an arrangement that will promote the best interest of the child.