Sentences with phrase «judge orders payment»

Not exact matches

The judge ordered that people who were still paying could stop their payments and the retirees would be repaid nearly $ 3 million.

When an offender has satisfied all the terms and conditions of a judge's order — including incarceration, parole and probation, payment of court costs and restitution — they have earned their way back into the community.

The Access Bank (GH) East Cant cheque number 890081 and the Attorney General's receipt which were exhibited to the Attorney General's affidavit sworn by the Attorney General herself on 9th November 2016 as Exhibits «AG 7» and «AG7A» are attached herewith in PDF for the public to judge how any Attorney General, worth the name, can accept a cheque drawn on the Economic and Organized Crime Office which was not party to the action as part payment of the refund ordered by the Court on 29th July 2014 for the Republic.

A state Supreme Court judge Tuesday ordered the Long Island Power Authority to pay Nassau school districts the full amount of tax payments billed by the county for the 2015 - 2016 school year.

In a major blow to Gov. Chris Christie that complicates his 2016 ambitions, a New Jersey judge ruled that he violated state law when he declined to make the full payment into the state's pension system for public employees last year and ordered him to find a way to fund it now.

A state Supreme Court judge ordered the Long Island Power Authority to pay Nassau school districts the full amount of tax payments billed by the county for the 2015 - 2016 school year.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, acting in a case that has been closely monitored across the nation, has upheld a federal district judge's order freezing $ 47.5 - million in Education Department funds pending the Reagan Administration's payment of desegregation aid to Chicago's schools.

Pick your reason to not partake: The total lack of research behind this assessment so there is no reliability or validity to it what so ever, they are using our kids to norm reference their assessment, for free, the subjectively set cut scores done by vote, not science, that have been set to intentionally fail 60 - 70 % of our students and their teachers which in turn allows for a whole other set of things to happen to schools and communities, the pending lawsuit against SBAC in Missouri where a judge issued a restraining order against the state from making payments, that we now also have to pay to them (where is that MOU?)

If the judge orders you to make payments to satisfy the debt and you ignore the court's order, this is contempt of court and can result in jail time.

The judge determined that the firm should not be compensated for its correspondences with potential claimants, and that it should only receive payment for postage, which amounted to $ 636 for the letters after the first order and $ 726 for the second round.

By order dated July 14, 2014, the motion judge, the Honourable Justice Martin S. James of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice sitting at Ottawa, granted Mr. Arnone's motion for summary judgment and ordered Best Theratronics to pay (i) damages equal to the gross amount of the salary Arnone would have earned until he qualified for an unreduced pension, less payments made to him to satisfy the statutory obligations of the employer, (ii) $ 65,000 representing the present value of the loss of an unreduced pension, (iii) a retirement allowance equal to 30 weeks» pay, and (iv) costs totaling $ 52,280.09.

The judge can order support payments to span whatever time frame he or she may deem appropriate.

The main issues on Appeal were twofold, namely whether the Judge erred in his conclusions as to the reasonableness of the imposed catch limits and whether the conditions were closer to «control» than «deprivation» and therefore required the payment of compensation in order to comply with A1P1.

On awarding damages at trial, unless the damages are very small and it is appropriate to order them to go to the litigation friend to be put into a building society account (or similar) for the child, the trial judge will direct payment into court with the placing of the damages in the special investment account until further investment directions have been given.

The wife applied to vary a nominal periodical payments order and the district judge decided she deserved # 16,500 per annum, which he then proceeded to capitalise at # 202,000 under the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 (MCA 1973), s 31 (7B).

They may consult the trial judge, but the trial judge can not make an order requiring payment.

The judge commented that the «ordinary or default position» was, therefore, that a party ordered in family proceedings to make a lump sum payment would not be released from his obligation to make the payment merely by virtue of his bankruptcy.

Subsequently, the motion judge varied the order to allow for payment of legal fees, living and other routine expenses.

Pending the finalising of the divorce and her legal bills, the judge ordered Mr Villiers to pay her # 5,500 - a-month in interim maintenance payments.

And within 10 working days: of a court receiving a letter, you will get a reply written to you or by telephone; of a judge's order, you will get a copy sent to you; of the court receiving a request for cancellation of a registered judgment — paid within one month — with proof from the claimant of payment, a certificate of cancellation will be sent out; and of the court receiving a request for a warrant of execution with the fee, the warrant will be sent to a bailiff — and the court will ensure that the bailiff makes a visit within 15 working days from the warrant being sent out.

The judge who approved the settlement didn't like it, and ordered the lawyer to also take payment in $ 10 gift cards from the store.

The judge noted that Miles was not seeking to set aside the order but rather to vary the periodical payments under the express power in s 6 of the 1975 Act.

Obviously such an order should not be made unless the judge who makes it is completely satisfied that there is no possibility that the assessment will be less than the amount of the advance payments.

This lasts throughout the bankruptcy process as the judge works to order, discharge or, through payment plans or liquidation, pay off your debts.

The appellant husband argued that (1) the trial judge erred in how he ordered the equalization payment to be paid; and (2) this error led the trial judge to make a further error with respect to his costs award, as it resulted in the trial judge failing to properly assess the reasonableness of the appellant husband's offers to settle.

In some cases, a judge may order a single lump - sum support payment.

With respect to (4) and (5), the ONCA set aside the motion judge's lump sum spousal support order, without prejudice to the mother's right to bring another motion for lump sum support, noting that the motions judge's analysis on this issue was lacking and that his approach supported the conclusion that the underlying purpose of his lump sum spousal support award was merely to convert the mother's unpaid equalization payment into lump sum spousal support following the father's bankruptcy.

The bill also contains additional provisions prohibiting judges from approving class actions in which the lawyer representing the class is a relative of a party in the class action suit; requiring class action lawyers only receive payment after victims are paid; and ordering that any third - party funding agreement be disclosed to the court.

Even though salary continuance is not a legal mechanism for the payment of statutory termination pay, and even though judges will often not order it as a remedy in a wrongful dismissal case, that does not necessarily mean that (a) salary continuance is never «legal» or (b) employees may not have to accept it.

The wide ranging powers of the English court mean that the judge can order payments based on family money and inheritances, even when such money is held through trust structures.

In light of this and other developments, the wife applied to a motions judge for an order that his ongoing child and spousal support obligations be converted to a lump - sum amount in the same amount as the equalization payment would have been, i.e. $ 50,000.

The respondent wife brought a motion asking the ONCA not to hear the appellant husband's appeal until he complied with the trial judge's order regarding the payment of spousal support and the posting of security for future spousal support payments.

Structal's appeal from the motion judge's order dismissing Structal's motion for payment was dismissed.

By Administrative Order dated March 2, 2018, Chief Administrative Judge Lawrence K. Marks further deferred the promulgation of the example of a notice of petition to be used in a proceeding under article 7 of the Real Property Actions and Proceedings Law on the ground that the respondent has defaulted in the payment of rent.

An enforcement action gives the judge the power to order the delinquent parent to follow the support order and make the required payments.

The Court of Appeal upheld the judge's order discharging the wife's order for periodical payments.

In this case, the sentencing judge, after presumably satisfying herself that the accused had the ability to pay the charitable donations, ordered a conditional discharge and charitable donations rather than a conviction and payment of a fine.

Third, the appellants submitted that the trial judge erred in finding that RCI was not concerned about transferring the purchase order to TM Canada because it knew that Getrag was contractually obliged to indemnify TM Canada for its payment obligations.

On a later application to vary, a judge will have to decide, with the benefit of hindsight, whether it would have been appropriate to suspend enforcement of the support order during the time when the former spouse was unable to pay, or whether at least a temporary reduction in the child support payments would have been in order.

1 Mar. 12, 2018 partially published; fee discussion published; other parts of opinion modified Mar. 27, 2018), the 4/1 DCA decided that a trial judge did not err in ordering that Family Code section 271 sanctions against an ex-wife could be paid for by ex-husband's deduction of the sanctions from the variable component of his spousal support obligations (in this case, future bonus payments).

32 In short, in the absence of some special circumstance, a judge should not vary or rescind an order for the payment of child support so as to reduce or eliminate arrears unless he or she is satisfied on a balance of probab - ilities that the former spouse or judgment debtor can not then pay, and will not at any time in the future be able to pay, the arrears.

In this case, the motion judges» three factual findings of: (i) the need for the father to pursue lengthy custody and access litigation in order to have any relationship with his children; (ii) the mother's failure to pay anything toward the costs ordered by the Court of Appeal; and (iii) the fact that the mother thwarted the enforcement of the costs award by reneging on assurances she made to the court about her intent to pay the costs and not use bankruptcy to thwart that payment, ground the finding of prejudice.

A judge can order child support, temporary custody or payment of household bills while the divorce is ongoing.

In family cases, interim orders are the judge's short - term decisions about issues such as child support, child custody, visitation, possession of the family home, attorney fees, spousal support or payment of debts.

A court order for support allows a judge to enforce support payments even if a mentally unstable or angry spouse refuses to pay.

Generally, a judge orders child support payments in your divorce decree based on your family's situation at the...

If your spouse forces you to take him back to court a second time, the judge will probably order sanctions against him, including payment of your court costs, jail time for contempt or a new parenting plan that eliminates or restricts his visitation.

Generally, a judge orders child support payments in your divorce decree based on your family's situation at the time of your divorce.

Child support guidelines help ensure that the child support payments Florida judges order in divorce cases are fair and consistent.

The Court of Appeal overturned a lower court decision where the Judge vested 100 % of this man's monthly pension payments in his ex-wife, and ordered the garnishment of that same percentage of the payor's government old age monthly benefits (even though federal legislation limits attachment of all those benefits to 50 %).