Sentences with phrase «judge orders the amount»

Not exact matches

This can amount to a lot of money in the U.K., which has a reputation of being a more sympathetic place to play out high - stakes divorces, because judges generally order a 50 - 50 split of assets, giving equal weight to the work of a wealth creator and a partner.

While a $ 10,000 personal fine might seem out of step with the massive amount of money PlexCoin took from investors, the news agency reports that the judge ordered the maximum fines allowed by law for an individual and a corporation.

In his order, Judge Donato wrote: «Facebook seems to believe... statutory damages could amount to billions of dollars.»

While federal judges and lawyers argue over whether President Donald Trump's revised executive order on travel amounts to a «Muslim ban,» evangelical experts on Muslim missions express concerns over how popular the proposal is in America's pews.

Judges are far less likely to order women to pay, unless her pay exceeds his by a huge amount.

The judge ordered that the civil servants must also show possession of a property within the FCT worth the same amount.

A state Supreme Court judge Tuesday ordered the Long Island Power Authority to pay Nassau school districts the full amount of tax payments billed by the county for the 2015 - 2016 school year.

A state Supreme Court judge ordered the Long Island Power Authority to pay Nassau school districts the full amount of tax payments billed by the county for the 2015 - 2016 school year.

In addition to the prison time, Scarborough was also ordered by a federal judge to pay $ 54,355 in restitution to the state and to forfeit the same amount to the United States, Attorney General Eric Schneiderman said in a press release.

The Sentencing Council providing guidelines for judges and chaired by Lord Justice Treacy also cautioned MPs that: «If the offender has insufficient resources to pay the total amount, the order of priority is: compensation; victim surcharge; fine; costs.

The judge ruled that the stickers amounted to an unconstitutional endorsement of religion and ordered them to be removed immediately.

That amount dropped after a judge ordered the state to repay IPS $ 6 million and Gary $ 1.3 million for students that had not stayed at the takeover schools.

Again, had the judge examined the evidence, he would have also learned that the actual major factor in Massachusetts» improvement was the very measure he refused to order Connecticut to implement: school finance reform that dramatically increased the amount of school funding statewide.

Judging by the limited information I get from my sales reports, a fair amount of my Amazon sales (on the order of 1 / 6th or even 1 / 4th) are from international customers already, and this should only help.

The Iowa men, accused of making online threats of violence against the World Pokemon Championships competition in Boston, were ordered held without bail Tuesday after Judge Thomas Horgan rejected arguments by their lawyers that their comments amounted to idle online bravado.

The judge determined that the firm should not be compensated for its correspondences with potential claimants, and that it should only receive payment for postage, which amounted to $ 636 for the letters after the first order and $ 726 for the second round.

In the US, the AVI has been putting up a number of [indecipherable 0:37:24] orders, and there is considerable amount of judicial education going on [indecipherable 0:37:28] resources available to judges so that people have resources to draw on.

By order dated July 14, 2014, the motion judge, the Honourable Justice Martin S. James of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice sitting at Ottawa, granted Mr. Arnone's motion for summary judgment and ordered Best Theratronics to pay (i) damages equal to the gross amount of the salary Arnone would have earned until he qualified for an unreduced pension, less payments made to him to satisfy the statutory obligations of the employer, (ii) $ 65,000 representing the present value of the loss of an unreduced pension, (iii) a retirement allowance equal to 30 weeks» pay, and (iv) costs totaling $ 52,280.09.

There are some clear fact patterns that emerge in cases where paying parents fail to pay child support in the amount ordered by the judge:

If our attorneys prevail in winning your case, the judge will order the defendant to pay you a specific amount of financial compensation for your losses suffered.

If you and the other parent agree on a monthly amount of child support, and the court agrees, the judge will sign a child support order that incorporates and / or conforms to your agreement.

(2) It is true that the judge stayed her order to allow for judicial review proceedings, but that amounted to an acknowledgement that the resources of the family court were exhausted, when they were not.

The trial court must make any order but may then direct the costs judge or district judge to determine the amount (46.8 (3)-RRB-.

In this case, Economical appealed the order of the application judge that required it to pay the applicant interest in the amount of two percent per month, compounded monthly, on attendant care, and housekeeping / home maintenance benefits.

In Mr. Ward's case, the Supreme Court of Canada ruled that the strip search was sufficient egregious to warrant Charter damages, and upheld the trial judge's order that the City compensate Mr. Ward in the amount of $ 5,000.

The Judge also clarified that there was no obvious parity between the amount of the freezing order and the amount of any bond put up in support of the cross undertaking: the two were separate and involved different considerations.

The amount and duration of spousal support can be negotiated and agreed to by the parties or ordered by a judge.

The judge ordered the defendants to pay the legal costs incurred by Senator Enverga, along with the general and aggravated damages and punitive damages awarded, thus bringing the total amount to which the Senator is entitled to $ 340,000 plus pre-judgment interest.

However, the MCA has created a statutory basis for lawfully restraining an incapable adult and, where the restraining measures employed amounted to a deprivation of liberty, a judge sitting in the Court of Protection has the jurisdiction to declare such acts lawful under MCA s 15 (1)(c) or to make an order consenting to confinement which would otherwise be a deprivation of liberty under MCA s 16 (2)(a).

Father also argues the trial judge erred in the amount he was ordered to pay.

The plaintiff asks the judge to order Google «to issue a first check of $ 250,000.00 and a second check in the amount that remains.»

Obviously such an order should not be made unless the judge who makes it is completely satisfied that there is no possibility that the assessment will be less than the amount of the advance payments.

If our attorneys prevail in winning your case, the judge will order the defendant to pay you a specific amount of money as compensation for your losses.

The defendant will be present and can say to the judge that the order ought not to have been made at all, or is too wide and should be limited in amount.

[Had there been a contempt finding, the motion judge could have ordered the father to pay an amount of money to the mother pursuant to Rule 31 (5)(c) of the Family Law Rules.]

The Judge also decides upon the amount or order that you are entitled to.

If the judge agrees with the requesting party, the judge will order an additur (an increase) or a remittur (a decrease) in the award amount.

In his decision, U.S. District Judge Percey Anderson wrote «If children have figured out that including ice in a cold beverage decreases the amount of liquid they will receive, the court has no difficulty concluding that a reasonable consumer would not be deceived into thinking that when they order an iced tea, that the drink they receive will include both ice and tea and that for a given size cup, some portion of the drink will be ice rather than whatever liquid beverage the consumer ordered.»

In light of this and other developments, the wife applied to a motions judge for an order that his ongoing child and spousal support obligations be converted to a lump - sum amount in the same amount as the equalization payment would have been, i.e. $ 50,000.

In Rowe the court held that the only way a trial judge can assure parties that the amount of attorney's fees / cost they're paying was determined in a just, objective and uniform manner is to enter orders containing detailed findings of fact as to the appropriate:

Where a judge finds were «equal participants in a joint in common enterprise» it would not be unfair to order a restitution order that makes both accused fullly liable for the entire amount.

On appeal, the wife argued that the motion to change judge erred in failing to order an amount of support within the SSAGs and in any event, had ordered an amount that was clearly wrong.

The net effect of the trial judge's order granting support in the amount of $ 275 per week ($ 14,300 per year) leaves the respondent with a yearly gross income of approximately $ 43,000 and the appellant with $ 31,000.

Depending on where the UM insurance policies come from and how they relate to each other, the judge may deduct in order of UM policies all amounts paid to the injured person.

While a district court judge found husband's actions «ill - conceived,» saying they were «classic stalking» and citing the pending criminal case, he did not find them to amount to disorderly conduct and thus declined to impose a restraining order.

Still, the judge's order, which was made public late Wednesday, renewed concerns among privacy advocates that Internet companies like Google are collecting unprecedented amounts of private information that could be misused or fall unexpectedly into the hands of third parties.

Speaking in R v Mills at Southwark Crown Court on 2 February, Judge Beddoe said the case «primarily involves an utterly corrupt senior bank manager letting rapacious, greedy people get their hands on a vast amount of HBoS's money and their tentacles into the businesses of ordinary decent people... and letting them rip apart those businesses, without a thought for the lives and livelihoods of those whom their actions affected, in order to satisfy their voracious desire for money and the trappings and show of wealth.»

Accordingly, the trial judge must exercise discretion in determining the amount of assistance to provide the unrepresented litigant in order that the litigant receives a fair hearing, as does the other party.

However, there was ample evidence for the summary trial judge to conclude that the Appellant agreed to the reduced amount, including the fact that the Appellant took no steps after her relationship with the abusive partner ended to enforce the terms of the original support order or seek arrears.

I have a court order in which the judge writes «There shall be no further amount of retroactive child support or ongoing child support as of July 31, 2016 payable by the Applicant to the Respondent.»