Sentences with phrase «judge other human»

They have learned to judge other human beings based on their deeds rather than their words.

In fact, if you listen, you would know that he has been widely recognized for his embracing of all people and encouragement of Christians to refrain from judging other human beings.

Not exact matches

In other words, as humans, we are intrinsically inclined to judge people.

But it is one thing to state that all human beings have some access to God's law within and through human nature, quite another to expect natural law theories based on reason alone to persuade others about contested moral issues in a context where such theories are stripped of their foundations in God as creator, lawgiver, and judge.

In any event, the Catholic Church also teaches that neither I, nor any other human), can judge a fellow man.

What makes human - kind special is the ability to accept others for who they are and not judge.

It's just part of being human * shrug * we all judge others, even those of us who know better.

nobody has a right to mock about others, you are judged by your actions and deeds, it's not possible to know about every faith in this world, but how ignorant can human mankind be especially after innocent Sikhs killed in Oak creek Wisconsin which was very widely covered.

Yes, it is true that God made man for woman, but we humans who has been born for the short time we are here must not judge each other for our indifferences and beliefs; we must help each other dodge the evils of this world and come together as the children of God.

And she «really likes gays more than Republicans» and she designed humans 14 billion years ago to have free choice so what they do «is up to them» and others have NO right to judge them..

The teaching of purity does not make any human being the judge and jury over others, nor does Deuteronomy, despite what this passage sounds like when you carve it out of the book.

I also know that humans by flawed default will interpret the words as they morally see fit, because it is in our nature to judge others against ourselves and our own ethics, beliefs, and morals.

On the other hand the human mind can not establish itself in its finitude and contingency as the ultimate judge of reality.

So God wouldn't judge one any harsher than the other because every human being is different God deals with each person different.

Us pagans believe we are endowed with reason which allows us to judge whether or not someone can be trusted to deliver on their promises, if they are dangerous, or harmful — by watching their behavior - We judge — not some other being upstairs - Obama has shown his lack of human compassion and untruthfulness for 4 years, we have seen that his God is re-election money and that is at who's feet he worships.

Versus humans killing humans who can't even figure our own lives out, yet we think we have what it takes to judge others.

Muslims in general if left alone with out your intervention might end up fighting each other due differences of views in their faith, but if west keep on applying pressure causing starvation, harassment and confrontation against Muslims and against their faith, this will only lead them to leave behind their differences and jointly or individually confront their enemies, those who wants to deprive them from their rights of faith and belief and the more they are pressed the more they would complain by reacting and not by words and cries since words and cries seem does not reach, heard or work out now a days since being their judges and executors are all of non religious such as atheists, infidels, polytheists who consider their vast interests above all humanity and faith issues such as mercy, leniency, compassion, pity, sympathy, kindness all that of human mutual heavenly code of conduct.!?

Example Membership, attend approach decision sector call concentration number deny contact used appeal proper something surround dream public speed resource stop other shape focus somewhat video perhaps human argue league sound that enable plan expenditure collect the burn murder amount appoint grant task girl time similar crime since divide once space reform measure glass exhibition judge hide appear piece cost end drink profit wild lord life few although anybody want stand refer drive lot continue insist read well sea existence map operate act release area holiday belief but thing drink

Being constantly reminded on the one hand of the infinite gap between one's own limited talents and vision and the perspective of Almighty God, and on the other of the radical equality with which God judges and loves the human race is a healthy counterweight to the flattery of the world and the smugness that comes with success.

Without considering the many thousands of other gods that have been ruled false throughout the ages, the reasons why these gods were determined to be merely human inventions, and applying those criteria to their own deity Christians aren't fairly judging God's existence, are they?

I pray that you will find our Creator, who holds not will over you, that does not judge you, and that accepts you as the perfect human being you are, though others may call you flawed.

Is it appropriate to judge someone who believes that is is okay to own other humans?

The human race has once and for all time demonstrated its inability to judge others when it judged and killed the Giver of Life Himself.

Here is a novel Idea maybe the Pope is waking the path of Jesus You remember Jesus the compassionate one who forgave others instead of judging them any less than human.

It's true that sinful humans shouldn't judge each other... but Jesus?

In a personal dissent, which no other member of the court joined, the Russian judge, Dmitry Dedov, argued that mandatory priestly celibacy was itself a human rights violation the court should not tolerate.

Judging others is a deep flaw that exists in all humans unfortunately.

But I'm not sure the comparison to «animals» is a fair one since animals do not wear clothes nor are human babies as instinctual and as self sufficient as most animal babies... (I've never heard of a mother chimpanzee holding her young over a bowl to pee; --RRB- but as long as our children are cared for in a loving manner we shouldn't judge too much other parenting techniques.

Writer Liz Marshall interviews Human Genome Sciences CEO William Haseltine and other competition judges to find out what they look for in an application.

We are born to judge others by how they look: our brains come hardwired with a specific face - processing area, and even shortly after birth, babies would rather look at a human face than anything else.

They are also more likely to judge other deprived moral offenders who do the same more leniently, says a new paper to be published in Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes.

The judges were told that one of the chats was with a bot, while the other was with a human.

The judge, a reporter with the London Times, decided R1 was the bot (meaning that the other IM screen was human).

However, because of the nature of the chamber sediments and the lack of other animal remains at the site, the researchers have not yet been able to nail down the exact age of these fossils, without which «there's no way we can judge the evolutionary significance of this find,» Rick Potts, director of the human origins program at the Smithsonian Institution's Natural History Museum, who was not involved in the discovery, told the Associated Press.

While it's human to judge the other, this behavior stems from ego and creates separateness.

Try not to hurt anyone around, but some people they just love to judge and forget that we are just human that has the same color blood, same need to eat, drink love and many other things...

Published by Shawe & Rosenthal LLP, Management's Workplace Lawyers, this blog informs human resource professionals, corporate counsel, business leaders, policy makers, journalists, judges, and other attorneys about critical labor and employment issues.

High - profile murders like Ramsey's often provoke gawking, callous media treatment, turning us all into rubberneckers, but Casting JonBenet vigorously works against that tendency, fascinated by our psychological need to judge other people's lives, but also deeply mournful, even respectful, of the very human reasons why we do so.

Research scientists at Kyoto University think dogs judge humans on how they treat other people, New Scientist reported.

«We applaud those states that recognize the clear Link between violence towards humans and animals by allowing judges to include animals in domestic violence protective orders — and we hope other states continue to follow suit.»

Published by Shawe & Rosenthal LLP, Management's Workplace Lawyers, this blog informs human resource professionals, corporate counsel, business leaders, policy makers, journalists, judges, and other attorneys about critical labor and employment issues.

I say that because at a certain level increases in performance over other mice becomes damn near impossible for a human to really judge.

And because heat can be stored in places other than at the surface, a lack of surface warming for a decade tells you almost nothing about the underlying long - term warming trends... I judge that there is virtually no merit to suggestions that the «hiatus» poses a serious challenge to the standard model [of human - caused global warming].»

Alarie: issues with quality of current decision making; mitigate heuristics into algorithms; implicit bias of judges; you control the info that you expose the algorithm to, curate the information; still problems, things may be correlated with negative things, e.g. racial implications, that we don't want related; gender, etc. other human rights type things; how to cleanse it appropriately; self driving cars just need to be better than humans; i.e. don't hold them to the standard of perfection; short term gains to be had

OHRC policies are well respected by the courts and by the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario, and have been regularly referenced in decisions by both judges and other adjudicators.

This change, more than any other I can envision, would transform how law is practiced by infusing lawyers and eventually judges, too, with the human compassion that invites clients» stories to be heard and their pain to be seen.

In February a Spanish judge of the National Court indicted Karake, along with 39 other Rwandans including president Paul Kagame, with crimes against human rights, claiming «universal jurisdiction» to do so.

He noted (among other things) the decision of the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) in Carson v United Kingdom [2010] ECHR 338, (2010) 51 EHRR 13 where (referring to its 2006 decision in Stec and others v UK (2006) 43 EHRR 1017, [2006] All ER (D) 215 (Apr)-RRB-, the court said: «Because of their direct knowledge of their society and its needs, the national authorities are in principle better placed than the international judge to appreciate what is in the public interest on social or economic grounds, and the court will generally respect the legislature's policy choice unless it is «manifestly without reasonable foundation».

Populist opinion might be outraged by the proposition that a convicted murderer in prison should have the right in prison to artificial insemination facilities, and for some this might appear the thin end of the wedge of unelected judges bestowing preposterous rights on a category of undeserving citizens, but others would welcome this decision as being tangible evidence of an enlightened ECtHR in action, vigorously championing human rights for all.

Next week he will honour this man and 119 other Kenyan justice champions: cleaners, doormen, ushers, court administrators, and judges who have given justice delivery a human face and who have made it better.