They have learned to
judge other human beings based on their deeds rather than their words.
In fact, if you listen, you would know that he has been widely recognized for his embracing of all people and encouragement of Christians to refrain from
judging other human beings.
Not exact matches
In
other words, as
humans, we
are intrinsically inclined to
judge people.
But it
is one thing to state that all
human beings have some access to God's law within and through
human nature, quite another to expect natural law theories based on reason alone to persuade
others about contested moral issues in a context where such theories
are stripped of their foundations in God as creator, lawgiver, and
judge.
What makes
human - kind special
is the ability to accept
others for who they
are and not
judge.
It
's just part of
being human * shrug * we all
judge others, even those of us who know better.
nobody has a right to mock about
others, you
are judged by your actions and deeds, it
's not possible to know about every faith in this world, but how ignorant can
human mankind
be especially after innocent Sikhs killed in Oak creek Wisconsin which
was very widely covered.
Yes, it
is true that God made man for woman, but we
humans who has
been born for the short time we
are here must not
judge each
other for our indifferences and beliefs; we must help each
other dodge the evils of this world and come together as the children of God.
And she «really likes gays more than Republicans» and she designed
humans 14 billion years ago to have free choice so what they do «
is up to them» and
others have NO right to
judge them..
The teaching of purity does not make any
human being the
judge and jury over
others, nor does Deuteronomy, despite what this passage sounds like when you carve it out of the book.
I also know that
humans by flawed default will interpret the words as they morally see fit, because it
is in our nature to
judge others against ourselves and our own ethics, beliefs, and morals.
So God wouldn't
judge one any harsher than the
other because every
human being is different God deals with each person different.
Us pagans believe we
are endowed with reason which allows us to
judge whether or not someone can
be trusted to deliver on their promises, if they
are dangerous, or harmful — by watching their behavior - We
judge — not some
other being upstairs - Obama has shown his lack of
human compassion and untruthfulness for 4 years, we have seen that his God
is re-election money and that
is at who
's feet he worships.
Muslims in general if left alone with out your intervention might end up fighting each
other due differences of views in their faith, but if west keep on applying pressure causing starvation, harassment and confrontation against Muslims and against their faith, this will only lead them to leave behind their differences and jointly or individually confront their enemies, those who wants to deprive them from their rights of faith and belief and the more they
are pressed the more they would complain by reacting and not by words and cries since words and cries seem does not reach, heard or work out now a days since
being their
judges and executors
are all of non religious such as atheists, infidels, polytheists who consider their vast interests above all humanity and faith issues such as mercy, leniency, compassion, pity, sympathy, kindness all that of
human mutual heavenly code of conduct.!?
Being constantly reminded on the one hand of the infinite gap between one's own limited talents and vision and the perspective of Almighty God, and on the
other of the radical equality with which God
judges and loves the
human race
is a healthy counterweight to the flattery of the world and the smugness that comes with success.
Without considering the many thousands of
other gods that have
been ruled false throughout the ages, the reasons why these gods
were determined to
be merely
human inventions, and applying those criteria to their own deity Christians aren't fairly
judging God's existence,
are they?
I pray that you will find our Creator, who holds not will over you, that does not
judge you, and that accepts you as the perfect
human being you
are, though
others may call you flawed.
Is it appropriate to judge someone who believes that is is okay to own other human
Is it appropriate to
judge someone who believes that
is is okay to own other human
is is okay to own other human
is okay to own
other humans?
Here
is a novel Idea maybe the Pope
is waking the path of Jesus You remember Jesus the compassionate one who forgave
others instead of
judging them any less than
human.
It
's true that sinful
humans shouldn't
judge each
other... but Jesus?
In a personal dissent, which no
other member of the court joined, the Russian
judge, Dmitry Dedov, argued that mandatory priestly celibacy
was itself a
human rights violation the court should not tolerate.
Judging others is a deep flaw that exists in all
humans unfortunately.
But I
'm not sure the comparison to «animals»
is a fair one since animals do not wear clothes nor
are human babies as instinctual and as self sufficient as most animal babies... (I've never heard of a mother chimpanzee holding her young over a bowl to pee; --RRB- but as long as our children
are cared for in a loving manner we shouldn't
judge too much
other parenting techniques.
We
are born to
judge others by how they look: our brains come hardwired with a specific face - processing area, and even shortly after birth, babies would rather look at a
human face than anything else.
They
are also more likely to
judge other deprived moral offenders who do the same more leniently, says a new paper to
be published in Organizational Behavior and
Human Decision Processes.
The
judges were told that one of the chats
was with a bot, while the
other was with a
human.
The
judge, a reporter with the London Times, decided R1
was the bot (meaning that the
other IM screen
was human).
However, because of the nature of the chamber sediments and the lack of
other animal remains at the site, the researchers have not yet
been able to nail down the exact age of these fossils, without which «there
's no way we can
judge the evolutionary significance of this find,» Rick Potts, director of the
human origins program at the Smithsonian Institution
's Natural History Museum, who
was not involved in the discovery, told the Associated Press.
While it
's human to
judge the
other, this behavior stems from ego and creates separateness.
Try not to hurt anyone around, but some people they just love to
judge and forget that we
are just
human that has the same color blood, same need to eat, drink love and many
other things...
And because heat can
be stored in places
other than at the surface, a lack of surface warming for a decade tells you almost nothing about the underlying long - term warming trends... I
judge that there
is virtually no merit to suggestions that the «hiatus» poses a serious challenge to the standard model [of
human - caused global warming].»
Alarie: issues with quality of current decision making; mitigate heuristics into algorithms; implicit bias of
judges; you control the info that you expose the algorithm to, curate the information; still problems, things may
be correlated with negative things, e.g. racial implications, that we don't want related; gender, etc.
other human rights type things; how to cleanse it appropriately; self driving cars just need to
be better than
humans; i.e. don't hold them to the standard of perfection; short term gains to
be had
OHRC policies
are well respected by the courts and by the
Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario, and have
been regularly referenced in decisions by both
judges and
other adjudicators.
This change, more than any
other I can envision, would transform how law
is practiced by infusing lawyers and eventually
judges, too, with the
human compassion that invites clients» stories to
be heard and their pain to
be seen.
He noted (among
other things) the decision of the Grand Chamber of the European Court of
Human Rights (ECtHR) in Carson v United Kingdom [2010] ECHR 338, (2010) 51 EHRR 13 where (referring to its 2006 decision in Stec and
others v UK (2006) 43 EHRR 1017, [2006] All ER (D) 215 (Apr)-RRB-, the court said: «Because of their direct knowledge of their society and its needs, the national authorities
are in principle better placed than the international
judge to appreciate what
is in the public interest on social or economic grounds, and the court will generally respect the legislature's policy choice unless it
is «manifestly without reasonable foundation».
Populist opinion might
be outraged by the proposition that a convicted murderer in prison should have the right in prison to artificial insemination facilities, and for some this might appear the thin end of the wedge of unelected
judges bestowing preposterous rights on a category of undeserving citizens, but
others would welcome this decision as
being tangible evidence of an enlightened ECtHR in action, vigorously championing
human rights for all.
These awards
are highly differentiated from
other awards within the industry as the
judging is done by
human resource leaders within some of the regions» biggest employers.