Sentences with phrase «judge others cause»

Christian the most two faced and fakes of all religion there is.people that like to rule everyone and judge no matter who u are or what u believe i myself is proud pagan.so go on with ur judge others cause that all u people know to do.and the companys just do ur bussiness.just leave the debate the ones in officess

Not exact matches

There is no need to judge others without just cause.

We are not to judge the world and sinners cause they are judging themselves but we are to rightly judge those that claim to be of Christ by the fruits of His Spirit in order to protect ourselves and others from wolves in sheeps clothing that have crept in unaware.

I have no desire to gossip, judge or cause others to sin, not that I really did these things to any previous level before but I could now see the wrong in such.

On the other hand, Satan lies to all people of all parts of the world to make us fearful and judge others as to cause us to put up walls between us.

Their boldness, firmness in the face of trial and how they answered to the judges in the name of their faith is very touching: Their well being is not the ultimate satisfaction but seeing others in painful situation caused them pain; they were willing to undergo difficulties and were totally oriented to others.

Muslims in general if left alone with out your intervention might end up fighting each other due differences of views in their faith, but if west keep on applying pressure causing starvation, harassment and confrontation against Muslims and against their faith, this will only lead them to leave behind their differences and jointly or individually confront their enemies, those who wants to deprive them from their rights of faith and belief and the more they are pressed the more they would complain by reacting and not by words and cries since words and cries seem does not reach, heard or work out now a days since being their judges and executors are all of non religious such as atheists, infidels, polytheists who consider their vast interests above all humanity and faith issues such as mercy, leniency, compassion, pity, sympathy, kindness all that of human mutual heavenly code of conduct.!?

But eventually the giver will judge that his generosity should be diverted to other, more promising causes, and then the defaulter will finally receive the logical consequence of his refusal: isolation.

And did not Paul write (and I'm paraphrasing in both cases, as I do not not have the exact verses memorized), «do not be quick to judge, lest you be judged in the same manner,» and, «do not act in a manner which creates barriers to others, causing them to lose faith.»

If it were an accident, the first time it caused rashes and or nose bleeds and diarrhea, they would have written what caused it in my Medical Records to stop others from causing the adverse reactions, but no, they have to try to prevent a Law Suit and write that I am delusional about the adverse reactions so every Doctor after that forced the adverse reactions on me and or refused to give me the Medical Treatment actually need, while they make money off charging the government for the Toxic Harmful Drugs that a Judge ordered them not to give me, tut they just falsely called me delusional about the Court Orders, to made money poisoning me with Toxic Drugs and Rash Creams, but normally they do that to their suspecting Victims to make money off doing Kidney transplants like they did to my Uncle, but they will not replace mine, because that is what they planned to do to kill me, just ask their associate assassin Dr Kanter of the Minneapolis VA, of course he will say I am delusional after he assaulted me saying the other Hospital Labs were wrong about that Blood Test that show the harm they caused.

Finally, in 1852, long after the Saints» exodus from Illinois (so there was no conceivable political or other cause for anyone to favor the Prophet), a federal judge concluded this litigation with a decree that found no fraud or other moral impropriety by the Prophet.

Again, a lot or most fights that cause controversy are fights where you will struggle to get all analysts and other fighters to actually agree on the winner (which proves its not a judge problem).

I read somewhere that some said we're not clinical enough that is a culture at wenger has become too friendly with the players at Arsenal the players position are seldom under treat you play poorly for two weeks and you still make the team you missed a look at almunia retrospectively don't understand that hey if i get a chance to score i must take it the first time cause i may not get a next one and you want the players to be clinical it must start from the top good work or none As was said on a website to day Arsenal should parade through the streets of london in an open top Bus at the end of the season the accountants of the club and i will through wenger in there too cause to most of you he can do no wrong I love this club with all my heart and i can support no other club in football but to see for 5 seasons we can't show any vast improvement and keep making the same mistakes every year is hard to swallow it makes me sick but as wenger says judge me at the end i wonder what end he meant the end of the season or the end of his contract GO ARSENAL......................

That deep love, that desire to protect and keep our children safe, can cause us to judge others either in response to criticisms, or (to keep with the war metaphor) so that we can «draw first blood.»

However, in addition to sweating, you should also be diligent in checking other symptoms as well before you judge if your child has an actual disease - causing the profuse sweating

Cuomo has acknowledged vetoing LATFOR's plan would likely cause «chaos,» and would send the whole mess to the courts, which 1) robs him of any control over the situation, and 2) gives the Legislature a good shot at getting what it wants, since judges traditionally shy away from getting deeply involved in political squabbles between the other two branches of government.

An editorial in The Lancet suggested the ACMD did not have sufficient evidence to judge the harms caused by this drug class and warned: «Making the drug illegal will also deter crucial research on this drug and other drug - related behaviour, and it will be far more difficult for people with problems to get help.»

Could the appearance of some candidates be the reason they won or could the other candidates non-appearance on PBP Radio, have caused their demise, we will let you the public be the judge.

The judge held that he would not stand the case down at the instance of a witness when there were 29 other cases on his cause list for the day.

The probable cause, Smith told the judge, points to LoPorto, McInerney and at least seven others connected to the Democratic party in Troy, including five members of the City Council.

«It would blow a massive hole in the city budget and take control of the NYPD from [Police Commissioner] Ray Kelly and give it to judges — which would cause crime to skyrocket,» Vallone, who has not taken a position on the other bills, added.

This judgement can come from strangers, other students, friends, and family, and it can cause a lot of negative feelings in the person being judged.

A defective, unhealthy, but common, belief that causes depression and a lot of marriage problems is when you judge your self - worth by other people's opinion of you.

Children and teens with social anxiety disorder have an excessive and persistent fear of social and / or performance Social anxiety disorder is when everyday interactions cause significant worry and self - consciousness because you fear being judged by others.

This has major implications in the sense that this makes suspect the causal statements also made by Chetty et al. and repeated by President Obama, the Vergara v. California judge, and others — that «high value - added» teachers caused students to ultimately realize higher long - term incomes, fewer pregnancies, etc..

This is hard to judge without hooking the vehicle up to a dedicated scan tool, but one thing to check is whether the VANOS unit has been refreshed recently, as VANOS solenoids jammed with crud may cause this (amongst a whole host of other possibilities).

Section 350 of the Bankruptcy Code permits a bankruptcy judge to reopen a bankruptcy that has been discharged «to administer assets, accord relief to the debtor, or for other cause.»

To the fullest extent permitted by law, by your access to the Sites, you agree that: (i) any claim, dispute or cause of action regarding the Sites or these Terms shall be brought individually (NOT AS PART OF A CLASS ACTION) in the federal or state courts of the State of New York, and, such claim / dispute / cause of action will be resolved by a judge and THE RIGHT TO A JURY TRIAL IS HEREBY EXPRESSLY WAIVED; (ii) you consent to the personal jurisdiction of such courts as the exclusive tribunal for adjudication of any such claim / dispute / cause of action, expressly waiving any right of forum non convenience, change of venue or like right; (iii) your recovery will be limited to actual out - of - pocket costs involved in specifically accessing the Sites (if any) and you expressly waive your right to all other forms of recovery, including by way of example only, punitive, consequential, indirect, incidental, special and exemplary damages as well as attorneys» fees for bringing such claim / dispute / cause of action; and (iv) the court shall apply the law of the State of New York in adjudicating any such claim / dispute / cause of action, except for the choice of law / conflict of law rules of the State of New York (or of any other jurisdiction which would result in the application of the law of any jurisdiction other than the State of New York).

As the owner and breeder of Borzoi, my contacts with other Borzoi breeders provides me with information on health, grooming, nutrition, problems faced by other breeders (or caused by them), evaluations of different judges, and more.

How can we accurately judge The Witness to be the best ever made when it's so good that it causes all other games throughout history to cease to exist, destroying all basis for comparison?

And in even more interesting news, Joy Garnett just gave me a heads up that the Warhol Foundation has actually filed an amicus brief in Cariou v. Prince, warning the courts that if Judge Batts» ruling were to stand, it would put works by other artists in jeopardy, and would cause «such uncertainty in the field as to cause a chilling effect on the creation of new works.»

Other possible causes of climate change, particularly the sun, will continue to be judged by the traditional standards despite what we know about: the modest but statistically significant 20th - century solar forcing, the cooler young sun, and climate during the Dalton and Maunder minima.

After suggesting Climate Scientist Myles Allen presented a misleading graph about CO2, and after receiving an admission from Oceanographer Gary Griggs that ice ages and other violent climate shifts, far greater than today's mild warming, can be caused by natural forcings, Judge Alsup turned to the centrepiece of the conspiracy charge, the «Smoking Gun» memo.

Since the plaintiffs claimed that burning of fossil fuels puts deadly CO2 into the atmosphere, causing all their forecasted death & destruction, then why didn't the oil companies ask the judge for a restraining order to prevent the plaintiffs from burning any more fossil fuels at least until the case was settled one way or the other?

in other words the complaint is the companies conspired to promote «massive amounts» of fossil fuels by hiding the fact that hey «knew» it would cause «catastrophic climate change impacts», a conspiracy claim even the judge recognized as bogus:

And because heat can be stored in places other than at the surface, a lack of surface warming for a decade tells you almost nothing about the underlying long - term warming trends... I judge that there is virtually no merit to suggestions that the «hiatus» poses a serious challenge to the standard model [of human - caused global warming].»

Despite what she found to have been an interlude of between one and two minutes after the forceps attempt and before the onset of the bradycardia, the trial judge concluded that the evidence was sufficient to establish that the one caused the other.

Accused went to cottage of JC with whom she previously cohabited — Accused found JC with victim, another lady, in sauna — Angry words were exchanged between accused and JC — Victim testified that accused pushed her following verbal exchange, as a result victim lost balance and ended up against stove, thereby sustaining serious burns to body — Trial judge accepted victim's evidence that there was some kind of pushing — Accused convicted on one count of assault causing bodily harm, and sentenced to two - year term of probation and $ 1,000.00 fine, and accused was also ordered to provide DNA sample pursuant to s. 487.04 of Criminal Code — Accused appealed — Appeal against conviction dismissed — Although trial judge did not address analytical steps in order, he properly analyzed evidence and concluded that injuries sustained by victim were not accidental and could not have occurred in any other fashion than as stated by victim — Having provided reasons for accepting victim's evidence, trial judge was entitled to reject accused's evidence — Trial judge's reasoning, though skeletal, permitted accused and appellate court to determine how and why finding resulted.

In addition to training externs and clerks, an upper - level class in judicial opinion writing provides an opportunity for students to hone their skills in writing for a particular audience, structuring and organizing, analyzing, and using rhetorical devices introduced during the first - year writing course through a different type of document.6 Such a course can cause students to look at the legal process from a different perspective and to become better critical readers and users of opinions by writing them.7 Thus, other goals of a judicial opinion writing course can include learning about the audiences of judicial opinions and the perspective judges bring to their opinion writing.

As I'm sure most of you will know by now, an Alberta judge has caught the world's eye with a hefty (176 page) decision that, among other things, produced a taxonomy of vexatious litigants who adhere to one cause or another or to a set of supposedly effective trial practices.

Amongst other reasons for that result was the realization that, in some cases, juries (and arguably even judges in non jury trials) were using a «substantial factor» analysis to find that negligence which was a but - for cause (whatever but - for means) was not a factual cause.

That was partly because insolvency cases were treated as commercial actions, so they were filtered effectively to him (or 2 or 3 other judges that were on the commercial bench in the Court of Session), but also because as more experienced senior judges became aware of the issues the lack of guidance was causing, they took active steps to ensure that the decisions being taking were published.

Lawyers who represent clients with unpopular causes face controversy and criticism all the time — from judges, from prosecutors and from others in the community.

The relevant portions of the transcript, available here at David Lat's Above the Law, show that the judge didn't say anything other than «proceed counsel» at the hearing, but subsequently, issued a Show Cause order asking Smith to demonstrate why his pro hac vice status shouldn't be revoked in light of his remarks.

Active and retired judges of courts of record of the Virgin Islands may serve as Designated Justices of the Supreme Court to fill vacancies caused by disqualification or other absence of a justice.

If fees are imposed, judges must be given enough leeway to waive the fees if paying them would cause a litigant undue hardship by requiring her to forgo other reasonable expenses.

(7) The judge presiding at a trial may discharge a juror on the ground of illness, hardship, partiality or other sufficient cause.

But, here, two of the Second Circuit's active judges ruled against Marblegate, the dissent was by a senior judge who can not vote on an en banc petition, and the Second Circuit has historically granted fewer en banc rehearings than any other circuit court.5 Other avenues could include Marblegate filing a petition for a writ of certiorari with the US Supreme Court and / or pursuing other federal or state law remedies, including state law theories of successor liability or fraudulent conveyance against the new EDMC subsidiary, theories that the Second Circuit noted as potential causes of action but did not anaother circuit court.5 Other avenues could include Marblegate filing a petition for a writ of certiorari with the US Supreme Court and / or pursuing other federal or state law remedies, including state law theories of successor liability or fraudulent conveyance against the new EDMC subsidiary, theories that the Second Circuit noted as potential causes of action but did not anaOther avenues could include Marblegate filing a petition for a writ of certiorari with the US Supreme Court and / or pursuing other federal or state law remedies, including state law theories of successor liability or fraudulent conveyance against the new EDMC subsidiary, theories that the Second Circuit noted as potential causes of action but did not anaother federal or state law remedies, including state law theories of successor liability or fraudulent conveyance against the new EDMC subsidiary, theories that the Second Circuit noted as potential causes of action but did not analyze.

In reaching these conclusions the judge noted that, among other things, he had taken into account the administrators» professional standing and reputation, the fact that a court should not remove an administrator simply because conduct has fallen short of the ideal (but in this case it had «gone further than that») and that this was not a case where removal would encourage activist creditor applications or cause insolvency office holders to «have to look over their shoulders».

Other factors a judge will consider include the length of the marriage; the contributions of a spouse to the acquisition, preservation, or appreciation in value of either spouse's estate; and the causes for the dissolution of the marriage — which could include consideration of whether one of the spouses was primarily responsible for the breakdown of the marriage.