«She had no conflict of interest in relation to suing the City, and she had a good reason to try to limit her own potential liability by suing the City,» the unanimous three -
judge panel wrote.
Not exact matches
The state's earlier definition of parent had become «unworkable» given today's increasingly varied family relationships,
Judge Sheila Abdus - Salaam wrote on behalf of five members of a six - judge p
Judge Sheila Abdus - Salaam
wrote on behalf of five members of a six -
judge p
judge panel.
«Appellants sustained their burden of showing injury by alleging that they paid artificially fixed higher prices,» Circuit
Judge Dennis Jacobs wrote for a three - judge appeals court p
Judge Dennis Jacobs
wrote for a three -
judge appeals court p
judge appeals court
panel.
«Any information that SCA disclosed to Berkshire Hathaway was not confidential information,» Circuit
Judge Edith Brown Clement wrote for a three - judge p
Judge Edith Brown Clement
wrote for a three -
judge p
judge panel.
He
writes for many wine publications including Decanter and The World of Fine Wine,
judges about ten wine competitions a year in Australia and overseas, and is involved in
judging or contributing to many other wine activities, including chairing the biennial Vin de Champagne Awards and various other competitions, also working as a panellist for SIPNOT (Stonier International Pinot Noir Tasting), a member of the
judging panel for the annual Winemaker of the Year Award and various others.
The state's former chief
judge Jonathan Lippman, who oversaw a
panel that recommended closing Rikers,
wrote in an opinion piece in amNewYork in October the timeline could be shorter and that de Blasio's plan «won't get us across the finish line.»
Another Igbo man, a Roman Catholic, in the
panel of
judges wrote a minority report.
Absent a decision from that
panel,
Judge Valerie Caproni
wrote in brief court papers, the case is likely to run from April 16 through the end of May 2018.
According to the standards the
panel was supposed to follow, that did not amount to grounds for not approving an incumbent
judge such as Ling - Cohan who has faced no disciplinary actions or even
written complaints against her.
Three jurors each
wrote to the
judge, asking to be released from jury duty, while a fourth said the
panel appeared to be deadlocked.
The challengers — an alliance of energy and fossil fuel companies and coal - producing states — wanted the court «to do something that they candidly acknowledge we have never done before: review the legality of a proposed rule,»
wrote Judge Brett Kavanaugh of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in an opinion unanimously backed by a three - judge p
Judge Brett Kavanaugh of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in an opinion unanimously backed by a three -
judge p
judge panel.
One of the
judges on the
panel dissented in part with the decision,
writing that patents on the genes should be invalid.
«The caprice of local political conditions can not be permitted to harm the educational opportunity of a child,» the five - member
panel wrote in its Sept. 15 report to Franklin Circuit
Judge Ray Corns, who declared the current school - aid system unconstitutional last May.
Using materials provided by the Center for Civic Education, the students in We the People delve into constitutional government with the gusto of the Founding Fathers, preparing for the day when teams line up before a
panel of
judges to deliver speeches that they've
written and memorized in response to a prompt given beforehand.
Just for good measure, there's also a time pressure — they have five consecutive days to develop an original mathematical model,
write their report and submit it to the
judging panel.
EEF Chief Executive Kevan Collins
writes about his experience as a
judge of this year's Pupil Premium Awards.As the chair of the
judging panel for this...
Instead, they directly relate to teachers but only tangentially to complaining students, District
Judge Stephanie Ray
wrote for the
panel.
Next, she enlists the assistance of a small
panel of nonpartisan scorers, perhaps parents or members of the business community, to
judge the essays — without knowing when each essay had been
written.
The shortlist for the Man Booker prize, whose
panel of
judges selects the best book
written in English of the year, was announced this morning.
The Man Booker Prize is awarded to the author of the year's best novel
written in the English language, as determined by an esteemed
panel of
judges.
He holds an M.F.A. in
Writing from Vermont College and is a 2010 International Thriller Writer's Awards
panel judge.
The shortlist — composed of novels deemed by a
panel of
judges to be among the best
written in English this year — is filled with novels that touch on some pretty grim topics.
Literary Death Match presents a thrilling mix of four famous and emerging authors who perform their most electric
writing in seven minutes or less before a lively audience and a
panel of three all - star
judges.
Once the top books are chosen by our
panel of
judges, the winning books and authors are included in a press release,
written by IR founder and PR pro, Amy Edelman, and distributed (via PR Web), to national print and electronic media outlets.
The
judging panel will truly be world - class, with
judges from across the United States joined by participants from around the world, including Europe and Asia, who will have their entries evaluated by this
panel of experts in a number of categories, and
judged according to a
written standard for its breed.
This travel
writing contest is now open for submissions; we return to its
judging panel once again
It doesn't have to be about Argentina, it can be about anywhere so think about a really incredible experience that you've had and that you'd like to share with us [00:40:30] and convince our
judging panel that you have the skills and the passion that it takes to take your travel
writing to the next level.
«Disqualification should not be used as punishment of counsel or as an example to deter lawyer conduct as such,» Ottenbreit
wrote in his decision on behalf of a unanimous three -
judge panel.
But
writing for the unanimous nine -
judge Supreme Court
panel, Justice Russell Brown said that the court has «never required claimants to show a recognizable psychiatric illness as a precondition to recovery for mental injury.
In addition to the holidays, I argued at the Fifth Circuit; published two articles at The Huffington Post (here and here); produced a podcast episode on appellate practice for the ABA's Sound Advice series; gave a presentation to the Dallas Bar Association (about the post-election Supreme Court and Trump's list of possible nominees); participated in a
panel discussion about e-briefs and legal
writing at the annual meeting of the Council of Chief
Judges of State Courts of Appeal (in North Carolina); was cited on SCOTUSblog and the Appellate Advocacy Blog (both here and here); and was quoted by Bloomberg (here, here, here, and here), CNN, and the Winnipeg Free Press.
In a ruling
written by justices Michael Moldaver, Andromache Karakatsanis, and Russell Brown, on behalf of a unanimous nine -
judge panel, the court sides with the defendant in ruling that his constitutional right to a reasonably timely trial had been violated.
Administrative Patent
Judge James A. Tartal, who dissented from the three - judge panel decision, wrote the majority opinion for the five - judge panel, incorporating much of his earlier dissent as the new majority opi
Judge James A. Tartal, who dissented from the three -
judge panel decision, wrote the majority opinion for the five - judge panel, incorporating much of his earlier dissent as the new majority opi
judge panel decision,
wrote the majority opinion for the five -
judge panel, incorporating much of his earlier dissent as the new majority opi
judge panel, incorporating much of his earlier dissent as the new majority opinion.
Bashman
writes that Allen discussed the recusal issue not out of malice (as the
panel suggested) but rather because the recusal issue was directly relevant to
Judge Allen's reason for voting to grant rehearing en banc.
Sotomayor did not
write the opinion this time, but participated as a member of the three -
judge panel.
Writing for the two -
judge majority of the three -
judge panel, Sotomayor affirmed the certification, holding that the standard of expert testimony for certification of a class is less than on the merits of a case.
In the case of Crookes v. Newton, Justice Rosalie Abella
writing for the majority of the nine -
judge panel, states: «Hyperlinks are, in essence, references, which are fundamentally different from other acts of «publication.»
«On appeal, the appellant appears to maintain his position that the Benchers do not have the authority to entertain a Charter challenge,»
wrote Justice Edward Chiasson, on behalf of a five -
judge panel.
In the ruling issued Thursday, Justice Eleanor Dawson,
writing on behalf of a three -
judge panel, restated the Federal Court's earlier declaration as follows: «The court declares that the Métis are included as «Indians» within the meaning of section 91 (24) of the Constitution Act, 1867.»
All were dealt with in the seriatim style: every
judge on the
panel wrote his own freestanding reasons without referring in any way to any of the others or adopting any part of them.
The unanimous three -
judge panel of the province's top court
wrote that the motion
judge got it wrong when he ruled the board had exclusive jurisdiction over the claim.
Dundee Precious Metals Inc. v. Marsland, 2011 ONCA 594 is a conflicts case in which the motion
judge's underlying no jurisdiction conclusion caused the
panel to
write, laconically,
Our
judging panel features World Bank general counsel Sandie Okoro, KPMG UK GC Jeremy Barton, former Anheuser - Busch InBev chief legal officer Sabine Chalmers and Legal Week publisher John Malpas, with the winning entry receiving # 5,000 in prize money and a
write - up in the The American Lawyer, Legal Week, LegalTech News and Corporate Counsel.
Writing for a three -
judge panel, Justice Ian Nordheimer found «the decision of the Appeal Panel that the appellant had engaged in professional misconduct is a reasonable one.&r
panel, Justice Ian Nordheimer found «the decision of the Appeal
Panel that the appellant had engaged in professional misconduct is a reasonable one.&r
Panel that the appellant had engaged in professional misconduct is a reasonable one.»
«We need not decide whether the district court abused its discretion by admitting this evidence because any error — if indeed there was one at all — was harmless,»
Judge Norman Stahl
wrote for the
panel.
In a
written decision released Monday, a three -
judge panel of the Court of Appeal of Alberta rejected the various grounds of appeal argued by Dax Richard Mack and also denied his motion to have fresh evidence looked at.
The Ninth Circuit en banc
panel, with a decision
written by Circuit
Judge Reinhardt, concluded that such a constitutionally protected liberty interest does exist.
In Tuesday's opinion,
written by appellate
Judge Janice Rogers Brown on behalf of the three - judge panel, she referred to the constant back - and - forth as «Sisyphean labor,» stating that the case must be brought to a close in «the interest of procedural fairness and judicial finality.&r
Judge Janice Rogers Brown on behalf of the three -
judge panel, she referred to the constant back - and - forth as «Sisyphean labor,» stating that the case must be brought to a close in «the interest of procedural fairness and judicial finality.&r
judge panel, she referred to the constant back - and - forth as «Sisyphean labor,» stating that the case must be brought to a close in «the interest of procedural fairness and judicial finality.»
In a
panel decision
written by Circuit
Judge Stoll, the court held that statements made during IPR proceedings, including in the patent owner's preliminary response, can be used to construe a patent's claims, and may result in a disclaimer of claim scope if the statements are a clear and unmistakable surrender of claim scope.
Circuit
Judge Jeffrey S. Sutton wrote yesterday's ruling of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit on behalf of a unanimous three - judge p
Judge Jeffrey S. Sutton
wrote yesterday's ruling of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit on behalf of a unanimous three -
judge p
judge panel.
A trial
judge, however, «may not substitute a defendant's ill - gotten gains for the victim's actual, provable loss,» Judge Judith Rogers wrote today for the D.C. Circuit p
judge, however, «may not substitute a defendant's ill - gotten gains for the victim's actual, provable loss,»
Judge Judith Rogers wrote today for the D.C. Circuit p
Judge Judith Rogers
wrote today for the D.C. Circuit
panel.