Sentences with phrase «judge ruled in»

A judge ruled in favour of the sellers, and ordered the defendants to pay the difference between the closing price and their initial offer back in March.

The judge ruled in favour of Re / Max on both counts.

The judge ruled in February this year that Jerry, as the employer, failed in his duty to keep Hunt from harm, and said that he and the bar Hunt went to after the party were 25 per cent responsible for damages.

Meanwhile, Lawrence Dale, one of the lawyers who represented Beach in this lawsuit says that, although the judge ruled in TREB's favour, the fact that the board's MLS rules were made public through the court may draw the attention of the federal government's Competition Bureau.

As we all saw, a recent judge ruled in favour of the Buyer where past renovations were performed to fix a problem.

The judge ruled in favor of the mother and denied the father's request to have the mother and child returned to Middlesex County.

A good thing to know: A Delaware judge ruled in favor of Ripple regarding the recent lawsuit over R3 consortium's wish to force the company to make good on a contract to buy a huge volume of XRP.

The judge ruled in her favour and the claimant appealed.

The judge ruled in favour of the parents.

In 2014, a judge ruled in favour of the victim and the doctor who was responsible for her initial treatment was ordered to pay $ 15 million in damages.

For example, in the case of Fiberglass Coatings, Inc. v. Interstate Chemical, Inc., a Florida trial court judge ruled in favor of the new employer and dismissed the tortious interference claim brought by the former employer based on hiring the employee who had a non-compete contract.

How has your judge ruled in rapidly evolving areas of the law, such as class certification, arbitration and personal jurisdiction?

In another summary judgment decision, a Superior Court judge ruled in favour of a plaintiff injured on college property on the first day of classes.

RESULT: After Gus cross-examined the accuser, the judge ruled in favor of our client and dismissed the charges.

Almost a year after the Federal Court struck down the health care restrictions to refugees, a second Federal Court judge ruled in Y.Z. v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) that restrictions imposed on some refugee claimants to an appeal body called the Refugee Appeal Division violated s. 15 of the Charter.

The Judge ruled in favor of Mr. Mavrick's client.

The pilot appealed to the Land Court, where the judge ruled in the property owner's favor, stating a zoning bylaw prohibiting a private landowner from creating a noncommercial, private heliport on his or her property is void unless the Department of Transportation Aeronautics Division approved the zoning bylaw in advance.

Judge ruled in Plaintiff favour, reason that Plaintiff sounded «more convincing».

The judge ruled in his favour and, on the secretary of state's appeal, the Court of Appeal held that the simple fact of a death or serious injury of a person in custody gave rise to an obligation on the state to conduct an enhanced investigation, by a person independent of those implicated in the facts.

The judge ruled in her favour.

Parents of two children in the Encinitas Union School district sued because they claimed the Ashtanga yoga classes being offered indoctrinate the children; however, the judge ruled in favor of the school district.

For example a federal judge ruled in November that affected communities do not have the right to free, prior and informed consultation on the project.

In February of 2012 a district court judge ruled in favor of MEIC and other plaintiffs and determined that MDT failed to consider impacts of constructing new highway turnouts along the route.

Prince had appropriated 40 of Cariou's photos altering them variously, and though the judge ruled in favor of Cariou in 2011, the appeals court largely overturned the original decision in 2013, deciding that most photographs suffered sufficient transformation and were thus under permitted use.

Today, I am excited to share with you that for the second time in just over two years, this month a federal judge ruled in our favor to protect the threatened sea otter!

Which is so untrue and after 19 months and 17,000 dollars legal fees the judge ruled in favor of the children.

A judge ruled in favour of a passenger whose Easyjet flight from Gatwick was delayed after the aircraft was held up following bad weather on an earlier flight.

As principal of PS 316 in Prospect Heights, Gure created «a «hostile, race - based work environment» and called a parent coordinator the N - word, a federal judge ruled in March 2014.

The Administrative Law Judge ruled in favor of FLDOE.

A Wall - Street run virtual charter school had its plans to open in North Carolina derailed Friday afternoon after a Superior Court judge ruled in favor of state education officials.

In April 2014, a federal judge ruled in DOJ's favor.

A Los Angeles County Superior Court judge ruled in favor of the plaintiffs in 2014, finding that five long - standing teacher job protections, including a two - year probationary period for new teachers and a layoff system based on how many years one's been teaching, violated students» constitutional right to an equal education.

The union took the issue to the state labor board, PERB, and a judge ruled in its favor.

But a judge ruled in January 2011 that public interest outweighed teachers» concerns.

News Release July 16, 2013 Media Contact Van Schoales, CEO A + Denver [phone] A + Denver Applauds Ruling to Uphold Innovation School plans A district judge ruled in favor of supporting many of Denver's Innovation school plans, a move that will mean higher levels of autonomy for several new schools.

In January, a Richmond, Virginia judge ruled in Virginia SGP's favor, despite the state's claims that Virginia school districts, despite the state's investments, had reportedly not been using the SGP data, «calling them flawed and unreliable measures of a teacher's effectiveness.»

A Marion County judge ruled in August that Indiana's voucher law doesn't violate the state constitution because taxpayer dollars aren't flowing directly into parochial schools.

A Harris County judge ruled in August that the Houston Chronicle lacked legal standing to seek an order forcing the Houston Independent School District to turn over the records.

This year, a state court judge ruled in favor of a Long Island teacher, determining that the «ineffective» rating she had received on the growth - score portion of her evaluation (the part linked to student test results) was «arbitrary and capricious.»

She sued, and a federal district judge ruled in 1998 that the district could not restrain her speech about her sexual orientation.

Uranium mining remains prohibited at a proposed in situ leach (ISL) mine in the Navajo community of Church Rock, New Mexico, until «deficiencies» in a clean - up plan are fixed, a federal administrative law judge ruled in February in the ongoing adjudication of the Hydro Resources, Inc. (HRI), Crownpoint Uranium Project.

In March, a judge ruled in a local court that work at the site should stop: a decision that was overturned in April.

A STUDENT who allegedly hijacked control of two computers at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology to distribute pirated copies of commercial software did not commit a crime, a US district court judge ruled in Boston on 28 December.

A judge ruled in favour of five supporters who accused Labour's NEC of unlawfully «freezing» them out of the contest.

She first sued the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey over toll increases, which she charged were illegal, though a judge ruled in favor of the transportation agency following a six - year court battle.

A judge ruled in October that raises for legislators were illegally passed.

A judge ruled in favor of the resident, which prompted Governor Andrew Cuomo to issue a statement, commending the ruling and pointing to what the Democrat calls the centerpiece of his criminal justice reform package — a plan to eliminate monetary bail all together for those facing misdemeanor or nonviolent felony charges.

Last week, a federal judge ruled in a civil suit that stop - and - frisk violated the constitutional rights of the plaintiffs, and appointed a monitor to oversee changes to the policy.

On Friday, a High Court judge ruled in favour of the allotmenteers.

A judge ruled in December that the city could not purge the data until the lawsuit was resolved.