First we needed to establish consistency in the criteria used to
judge standards documents.
Not exact matches
Judging appropriate content for
standards documents is complicated.
The purpose of this
document is not to emphasize faults or support fault
judging, but to assist
judges in assessing the degree of significance of faults listed in the breed
standard.
If you believe that «the internet» begins when the
document is released by the
judge, I suggest it can only mean that the desired publication and dissemination
standard must be understood at the time it is released... and, ideally, that the
judge has taken full account of the public interest in the details of the case at the time the ruling is written.
Parties would no longer have an automatic right to
standard disclosure and
judges would be expected to take a more active role in managing the
document process.
The Nuremberg Code was developed for the Nuremberg Military Tribunal as
standards by which to
judge the human experimentation conducted by the Nazis, and was one of the first
documents setting forth principles for the ethical conduct of human subjects research.