But now, prodded by President Barack Obama's $ 4.35 billion Race to the Top program, at least 26 states have agreed to
judge teachers based, in part, on results from their students» performance on standardized tests.
Thus it is not only unfair to
judge a teacher based on test scores, but also ineffective — research has shown that test - based incentive programs do not lead to improvement of student achievement.
Not exact matches
While unions have said they worry that
teachers could be unfairly
judged based on their students» test results, the scoring for students and
teachers is quite different — students get an objective standardized test score, while
teachers are evaluated under multipart programs that are developed by local
teachers unions and school leaders.
The new methodology is already challenging widely held beliefs by finding that
teachers can not be
judged solely on the
basis of their academic credentials, that classroom size is not always paramount and that students may actually be more engaged if they struggle to complete a classroom assignment.
The Piano
Teacher,
based on a novel by Elfriede Jelinek (apparently largely autobiographical, which is disturbing news in itself), is much more classical in style, though as before it demands considerable input from the viewer: Haneke deliberately avoids making any comments on the film's action, letting the audience
judge for themselves.
Absent regular assessment data,
teachers can only be
judged based on how well other people think they're teaching, on paper credentials or lesson plans.
Many state accountability plans
judge schools on the
basis of these tests alone, and some states and school districts are considering tying
teachers» compensation to student test results.
Most
teachers, he said, are opposed to being
judged based on student test scores and believe that the current seniority system is fair and necessary.
And though the
judge upheld other parts of the Regents regulations opposed by NYSUT, he also struck down a piece of the regulations that determined how
teachers would be rated — ineffective, developing, effective, highly effective —
based on the multiple measurement scale.
Since a
teacher had to score at least 64 points to avoid the «ineffective» rating, according to the Regents» plan, it was conceivable, as the
judge noted, that «the regulation allows for an «ineffective» rating
based solely on poor student achievement results (the first 40 % category) without regard to the 60 % evaluation category.»
Some are
based in schools and operated by
teachers or counselors; others are court -
based, administered by
judges, social workers or other court staff; yet others are community -
based, and organized by local non-profits.
In an era when
teachers are more often
judged based on students» test scores, this shift is huge.
But this lack of evidence does not prevent NCTQ from confidently declaring that they know what
teacher prep programs should be doing and
judging them on that
basis.
Here's an example of how NCTQ mis - reads the research: Standard 13 is «Equity» and
judges teacher prep programs
based on whether «The program ensures that
teacher candidates experience schools that are successful in serving students who have been traditionally underserved.»
Linda Darling - Hammond, a highly respected professor at the Stanford Graduate School of Education, testified during the Vergara trial that a
teacher's performance should not be
judged on the
basis of flawed test rankings.
We
judge our schools and increasingly individual
teachers based on their ability to improve the reading skills of our children.
Principals will be
judged based on how many successful
teachers they hire.
However,
judging teachers and awarding bonuses simply on the
basis of test scores is problematic.
• Does Hines really want future
teachers to be
judged only on the
basis of skill and mastery of content knowledge?
These two philosophies come to a head in a classroom like John Bierbaum's, who teaches social studies in Normal, Ill. «I feel really strongly that as a
teacher, I should be
judged based on a standard,» Bierbaum said.
The selection of the overall Kentucky
Teacher of the Year was
based on the compilation of scores from all phases of the
judging.
The exclusive use of direct observation as an evaluation procedure presumes that observable, overt teaching actions provide a sufficient
basis for
judging a
teacher's adequacy, even though teaching may not be just a set of observable performances or behaviors.
Also, suppose that principal evaluations do not closely correspond to
teachers» actual contributions to the school community, perhaps because the principal
judges this
based in part on how well the principal gets along with the
teacher rather than, as intended, how much the
teacher helps other colleagues.
She argues instead for «assessment as conversation» in
judging writing, a model of assessment
based on an illuminating exchange of the
teacher's and student's perspectives and background knowledge about a piece of writing.
However, just as we as
teachers would never
judge our students
based on one test score at the end of one year, SGPs also only form one part of the evaluation system.
How can you
judge a
teacher practice
based on two observations per year?
According to a review by the National Council on
Teacher Quality, a Washington, D.C. - based reform group, 20 states in 2012 required student achievement as a significant part of judging teacher performance, including multiple states where student data accounts for 50 percent of an eval
Teacher Quality, a Washington, D.C. -
based reform group, 20 states in 2012 required student achievement as a significant part of
judging teacher performance, including multiple states where student data accounts for 50 percent of an eval
teacher performance, including multiple states where student data accounts for 50 percent of an evaluation.
Student
teachers had to
judge what was important to discuss in the weekly live session,
based on what they saw in the weekly assignments that students submitted and read on the discussion board.
Judge Moukawsher called for the removal of persistent barriers to student success and equity, such as arcane
teacher and leader staffing systems
based only on years on the job and degrees earned while leaving out the most important factor: impact on student growth.
Officials shot down the months - long effort
based on a last - minute binder of «rescission» signatures collected by Parent Trigger opponents, including local representatives from the California
Teachers Association — a move the
judge now calls illegal.
In later studies not associated with the TIMSS project, researchers
judged teachers» understanding of mathematics and science teaching techniques
based on their observations of TIMSS videos (Kersting, 2008; Star & Strickland, 2008; Wong, Yung, Cheng, Lam, & Hodson, 2006).
In Louisiana,
teacher preparation programs are now
judged partly on the test scores their graduates» students earn — part of a growing national movement to assess education schools
based on their results.
Obama called for the abolition of «firewall» rules, which prevent many schools from
judging teacher performance
based on student performance.
If a
teacher sues on the
basis that a policy unconstitutionally denies them «substantive due process» or equal protection, a
judge will consider their complaint under what's known as a «rational
basis analysis,» meaning the
judge will look to see if the policy can be shown to have any kind of rational relation to a legitimate government issue.
A Los Angeles County Superior Court
judge ruled in favor of the plaintiffs in 2014, finding that five long - standing
teacher job protections, including a two - year probationary period for new
teachers and a layoff system
based on how many years one's been teaching, violated students» constitutional right to an equal education.
«I believe [
teachers» unions] are using the bill as an end run around the
judge's ruling,» said Arun Ramanathan of Education Trust West, an Oakland -
based educational policy research group.
The core of the question asks whether
teachers should be
judged on having a «proven track record of effectively increasing student growth» or whether the decision should be
based «solely on the length of time teaching.»
It is certainly Orwellian to learn that while Governor Malloy's new education reform bill will
judge my child's
teacher on the students» CMT scores; the state is telling me that I shouldn't make educational decisions about my own child
based on the same CMT results.
How fair, then is it, for individual
teachers to be
judged strictly on the
basis of standardized test results, without any of the other factors in a child's life being changed?
They forced
teachers and schools to be
judged and punished
based on these tests.
For her part, Laughner has no problem being
judged based on her students» test scores and says she doesn't want to be «lumped in» with less effective
teachers.
Teachers and administrators are worried about being
judged inappropriately on the
bases of standardized tests (Paris & Urdan, 2000; Smith, 1991).
Rather than develop a
teacher evaluation system
based on how well that educator is actually doing, Malloy and the education reformers want to stick with a faulty system that will unfairly
judge teachers on factors beyond their control.
So
teachers face the dilemma that their students» learning (and the individual
teacher's effectiveness) will be
judged on the
basis of recall of information at the same time there is general agreement that the 21st century skills demand creativity, critical thinking and problem solving, communication, and collaborating with others.
In August, a New York State Supreme Court
judge invalidated a vote by state education officials that would have let districts
base 40 % of
teacher evaluations on state test scores, after the state
teachers unions sued saying the law allowed for only 20 %.
In his view, criteria for
judging teacher effectiveness could be
based upon Shulman's categories of
teacher knowledge — especially academic content knowledge, pedagogical content knowledge, knowledge of the curriculum, and knowledge of learners and educational contexts.
While the gap has shrunk, more
teachers are scoring level 5s
based on test scores than are being
judged level 5s by their observers.
This past April, the California Court of Appeals unanimously struck down the controversial Vergara v. California decision, in which a Los Angeles County Superior Court
judge ruled that five longstanding
teacher protections — including a two - year probationary period for new
teachers and a layoff system
based on how many years one's been teaching — violated students» constitutional right to an equal education.
Bay Area News Group's Joyce Tsai reported in the Mercury News on the hearing, in which the Petitioners — a group of California
teachers, parents and concerned taxpayers — asked
Judge Barry Goode to compel 13 California school districts to comply with the Stull Act, a longstanding state law that requires school districts to evaluate
teacher performance
based, in part, on student progress.
People who oppose standardized test - centered school reform that
judges schools, students and
teachers on the
basis of test results:» d) Offer no credible alternative to tests to evaluate and compare student performance.