Instead of seeing a potential mate for who they are, they are
judged against your idea of the perfect person and you don't ever truly «see» them.
Not exact matches
The majority of christians have no
idea about their faith or what it is to be christian, you see them spout nonsense from a bible they have never read and
judge or even hate others who do not believe their beliefs, all the while not knowing they are going
against its teachings.
But I do agree with
judging ideas / theologies and concepts — since these are things people adopt and they can be discussed to help make a better society — but no shot at the person has to be done in those discussions (since it
against no one person).
But the
idea that every human law is imperfect, and therefore unjust to some extent, does indeed make sense, because we can imagine a perfectly just
judge who administers perfect justice» who assesses a person's talents, motives, opportunities, weaknesses, ideals, history, and everything else about him, and then
judges all his actions
against the standard of what he is able to do.
Some have suggested Broad seemed to win the day, but Robert Cook - Deegan, who specializes in patent policy at Arizona State University in Tempe and attended the hearing, said he had no
idea how the
judges would rule and warned
against overinterpreting their questions and responses.
This perspective was recently given legal validation with the judgment in the case of Re-Digi vs. Capitol Records, where the
judge ruled
against the
idea that digital products qualified for First Sale protection under the law and reinforced the perspective of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act that digital products constitute a completely different category of products from hard copy products.
It doesn't mean that I can't come up with a great
idea — it just means that now I have more realistic criteria to
judge it
against, and if I do ever have a Eureka moment, it'll be more likely to be a good one... whether it happens when I'm 30, 40, 50, or 60....
This leads to chronic litigation, as no matter how convincing the evidence
against them or what the
judge's decision, they do not let go of the
idea that they are right.
You may very well be a rare fair - minded individual working within the wrong camp (as I describe misguided government agency assisted highjacker outfits like Realtysellers) who has bought into the
idea that what TREB did to Realtyseller / Dale / Beach awhile back (cutting them off from the MLS) was unjust, when in fact it was very just, according to a
judge who ruled
against the highjackers at that time at the conclusion of Realtysellers» court appeal
against TREB's actions.