The point on which we differ is whether we will be
judged by a higher power after we die.
Not exact matches
In a particularly damning judgement, three
judges at the
high court found Grayling had overstepped his legal
powers by attempting to restrict legal aid to those who had been in the UK over a year.
Lawyers for six former trustees suing to get their positions back after they were kicked out
by Mayor de Blasio and Queens Borough President Melinda Katz revealed in court papers the library has retained a
high -
powered former federal
judge to probe leaks that led to a series of stories in The News about library director Thomas Galante's $ 392,000 salary and his free - spending ways.
But the
High Court ruled that NHS England does have the legal
power to commission PrEP, a decision that has now been supported
by three Court of Appeal
judges, who decided to rule in favour of the National Aids Trust.
Judging from the S&P 500, you face a slight risk that your buying
power would temporarily drop up
by 10 % in times of
high inflation.
For example, a casual perusal of the online legal research service Westlaw reveals that «mumbo jumbo» appears at least 251 times in judicial opinions.8 «Jibber - jabber» shows up just seven times (although surprisingly used
by parties, rather than in statements from the court), while the more prosaic «gobbledygook» has 126 hits in the legal database.9 Believed to have been coined in 1944
by U.S. Rep. Maury Maverick of Texas, «gobbledygook» has been used
by everyone from political figures referring to bureaucratic doublespeak (for example, President Ronald Reagan's stinging 1985 indictment of tax law revisions as «cluttered with gobbledygook and loopholes designed for those with the
power and influence to have
high - priced legal and tax advisers») to
judges decrying the indecipherable arguments and pleadings of the lawyers practicing before them.