Sentences with phrase «judged by other people»

They either won't be interested or will feel hurt and embarrassed that they are being talked about and judged by other people.

Sometimes, people with herpes may be judged by other people, but it is not usual.

It connects big beautiful women and men as well as their admirers perfectly, you will be able to find your ideal match without being afraid to be judged by other people on this BBW site.

For example, you will find it very easy to open up about an alcoholic past or a family separation and you will not worry about being judged by the other person.

I gave the page and figure numbers as they appear in the text of the edition I possess, which, to judge by other people's references, is the same text (with the same numbers) as in all other editions.

Not exact matches

However, cultures that permit judging a person by anything other than their abilities and merits can stymy growth or even bring down a company.

People who are overly worried about making a mistake or being judged by others tend to avoid situations that otherwise might have good outcomes.

You don't have to respond because we already know you are an angry person who just wants to show everyone how Godly you are by bragging and keeping your little secret and judging others.

People need to learn to be more tolerant of other cultures and not judge people by their own ePeople need to learn to be more tolerant of other cultures and not judge people by their own epeople by their own ethics.

The judges stopped short of ruling drivers have a legal duty to force non-disabled people off buses if they refuse to move for disabled people, but they said drivers could urge them to move in other ways, for example by refusing to drive the bus.

So, in warning, Jesus advised people not to expose themselves as hypocrites by judging others because nobody is perfect enough to get away with it.

It opens with a prohibition («judge not»), followed by a statement of what God will do (judge each person by his / her own judgment of others) and concludes with a practical application («first take the log out of your own eye»).

-- like the Republican evangelicals who all think their church is the most Christian, the most right, the only ones going to heaven yet ignore the real teachings of Jesus by judging others, ignoring charity and the needs of their community, not understanding when the Lord's Prayer begins with «Our» Father — the «Our» is not just white people.

Some people will be ressurected and stay with us for eternity... but others will be ressurected and Judged by God and be killed again.

In both cases, the standard by which other people are judged is one's own beliefs and lifestyle.

Also I'm most of the time very good at judging others to some kind of standard that I expect people to live by, meaning I want to put them into religion or at least have some kind of control over them.

This was how one advanced in an «other - directed society,» where society judged a person by how he or she presented him or herself.

By the way by no means does this mean that I am particularly against Islam, I am also against Judaism, Christianity, and any unproven dark age manifestation of a all knowing, creator, If there was a god he sure does «nt need help enforcing his edicts and morals, remember that if there is a god then as many religions state, people will be judged upon there beliefs and sins after death and spend eternity in heaven or hell, so why is it so important for people to butt in and start trying to control each other and force people to believe in something that many think is absurd and insanBy the way by no means does this mean that I am particularly against Islam, I am also against Judaism, Christianity, and any unproven dark age manifestation of a all knowing, creator, If there was a god he sure does «nt need help enforcing his edicts and morals, remember that if there is a god then as many religions state, people will be judged upon there beliefs and sins after death and spend eternity in heaven or hell, so why is it so important for people to butt in and start trying to control each other and force people to believe in something that many think is absurd and insanby no means does this mean that I am particularly against Islam, I am also against Judaism, Christianity, and any unproven dark age manifestation of a all knowing, creator, If there was a god he sure does «nt need help enforcing his edicts and morals, remember that if there is a god then as many religions state, people will be judged upon there beliefs and sins after death and spend eternity in heaven or hell, so why is it so important for people to butt in and start trying to control each other and force people to believe in something that many think is absurd and insane.

In a recent paper Rogers defines a person as a fluid process and potentiality «in rather sharp contrast to the relatively fixed, measurable, diagnosable, predictable concept of the person which is accepted by psychologists and other social scientists to judge by their writings and working operations.»

But I've never been one to judge because it takes two people to stay in a relationship but only one to desire a divorce, and you never know exactly which of the two people would have stayed «in the game» at any cost but the decision was made by the other party.

Well, part of the teachings include «not to judge others», so... I get judged all the time by non-religious people.

The fact is, people are judged on a daily bases by other people, thus the justice system.

Judge people by how they treat others and the goodness in their heart, and if their spiritual belief or practice does not harm anyone else... then leave it alone.

The Prez Needs prayer and slavation he is no better than anybody else in the world him and bin laden and all the other ppl in the world are judged by the same God and standards

The way we carry ourselves, talk to others and treat people matters: It produces the fruit by which we — and our faith — are judged by people from the outside.

When saying Merry Christmas has become a bad thing, when we can no longer have the peoples vote counted and respected by judges and elected officials, when health care for aids and other associated dieses is covered, when kids in school have to be subjected to demonstrations of gay bedroom life when the mayor of NY will no longer without reason and against the law rent churches public buildings, when teen pregnancies up 45 percent will be paid for by us the people of the US with all the cost completely covered.

Jeremy I believe you answered the question in another discussion why God seemed evil by punishing other nations i prefer the word you used which is judgement.God weighs up the hearts and then judges fairly thats not evil in fact he weighs up all the factors before he makes his decision and his decisions are perfect and wise.When he commanded Israel to wipe out other nations it was Gods judgement on these nations because of the evil they had committed in alot of ways its exaggerated because they did nt have Christ to shield them like we have if anything it shows how merciful God is towards us today.In those days gods judgement was quick and immediate.What happened to Israel when they broke the laws God gave them they immediately fell into judgement often resulting in many deaths to there own people until the sins of the people were dwelt with.So even for Gods people it was a conditional on there attitude and actions towards God.Again we see God is merciful to these previous nations that were destroyed as Christ after his crucifiction went and preached to them giving them the opportunity to repent so again we see God is still merciful.His word is true The Lord is not slow in keeping his promise, as some understand slowness.

Gil you have asked some very good questions why does bad things happen in the world i personally do nt know God did nt explain to Job either why he had to suffer.What i do know is that God desires that none of us should perish but that all would have eternal life in him through Jesus Christ.This world will one day pass away and the real world will be reborn so our focus as christians is on whats to come and being a witness in the here and now.Both good and bad happens to either the righteous or the sinner so what are we to make of that.What we do know is that God will set all things right at the appointed time the wicked will be judged and the righteous will be rewarded for there faith isnt that enough reason for us to believe.Free will is only a reality if we can choose between good and bad but our hearts are deceitfully wicked we naturally are inclined toward sin that is another reason whyt we need to be saved from ourselves so what are we to do.For me Christ died and rose again that is a fact witnessed by over 500 people that were alive at the time and was recorded by historians how many other religious leaders do you know that did that or did the miracles that Jesus did.As far as the bible is concerned much of the archelogical evidence has proven to be correct and many of prophetic words spoken many hundreds of years ago have come to pass including both the birth and the death of Jesus.Interested in what philosophy you are believing in if other than a faith in Jesus Christ so how does that philosophy give you the assurance that you are saved.Its really simple with christianity we just have to believe in Jesus Christ.brentnz

Heavily influenced by the Enlightenment and the philosophical tradition of Logical Positivism (the idea that if something is not able to be judged true or false, then we are rationally compelled to ignore it as irrelevant), much of the modern Church has bought into the belief that the truth of Christianity should be treated like any other set of factual claims, and that people of faith can somehow rationally observe ultimate truth with a level of personal detachment and objectivity.

I too may judge her when I have made... «my home among the poor, and not only the poor, but the poorest of them: the people no one will go near because they are filthy and suffering from contagious diseases, full of germs and vermin infested; the people who can't go to church because they can't go out naked; the people who can no longer eat because they haven't the strength; the people who lie down in the street, knowing they are going to die, while others look away and pass them by.»

We judge our friends more positively than other people judge them, and we are likelier to excuse unfair behavior by an in - group member than we are to excuse the same behavior committed by someone outside the group.

They see it almost as an insult, because they know about the millions of so - called christians in America who judge others by political affiliation, by income, by race, who only help people who are similar to themselves, who only befriend non-christians when it helps them or if they see an opportunity to convert, etc. - in short, the millions upon millions of Americans who call themselves christians yet do not even attempt to follow the teachings of Jesus.

Whenever I debate a believer, in a calm rational debate it usually devolves into the person defending religion getting angry because he or she can not simply answer any question other than by saying stuff along the lines of, «well our brains are too small to understand» or «god works in mysterious ways» or my personal favorite «God will judge you for you unbelieving ways».

I stand without peer as a maker of chili, and as a judge of chili made by other people.

I had no idea it was such a cult favorite, but judging by the amount of people wrapped around the block of our coffee shop, maybe it struck a heartstring of other ladies too.

Statement is baffling and is in fact the very thing that guys like cap and others are fighting against the truth is Colin didn't orignaly kneel during the anthem he sat on his bench he was then approached by vets who asked why he was sitting and asked him to do something else because sitting was disprectful it was those army vets who told cap to kneel because it shows your fighting against something and not just sitting to sit they told him it would be a better look and it's funny how people turn around and say he is disrespecting the very people who told him what to do and how to do it to get his message across this is the ignorance of America and everything cap fights against you judge a man by the color of his skin and his upbringing and not the content of his character you don't know anything about cap yet you pull this entire story out your ass go sit down clown

You are a great fan who see the truth about a person and judge based on that, One thing about arsenal fans never like David Ospinah for what i real do not know, When arsenal signed Per Cech the world was happy that he will save us by 12 Points those points went on the drain and making other teams won.

All this jobs made that he wasn't just judged on only footballing results but one by one gazidis has delegated most of this task to other persons (he bought the best staff available).

I think that if you never get judged by others for your parenting, you either only hang out with people exactly the same as you, and you are perfect in living out your convictions, or you hang out only with people who are non-judgemental (very rare).

By reading your post, i feel like that you are judging others by their mistakes... people learn by them, its a part of lifBy reading your post, i feel like that you are judging others by their mistakes... people learn by them, its a part of lifby their mistakes... people learn by them, its a part of lifby them, its a part of life.

I have only seen people be judged around here for continuing to hold onto opinions that are not supported by facts, or for judging others as bad parents for dumb reasons, or taking risks like homebirth for frivolous reasons.

[14] However, referring to a Conference speech by the party's former leader, Campaign Manager Andrew Mitchell said: «William Hague made a great speech which many people will judge to be better than all the other leadership candidates put together.

An editorial in The Lancet suggested the ACMD did not have sufficient evidence to judge the harms caused by this drug class and warned: «Making the drug illegal will also deter crucial research on this drug and other drug - related behaviour, and it will be far more difficult for people with problems to get help.»

Section 2 (1) of the Terrorism Act states that «where two or more persons associate for the purpose of, or where an organisation engages in: (a) participating or collaborating in an act of terrorism; (b) promoting, encouraging or exhorting others to commit an act of terrorism; or (c) setting up or pursuing acts of terrorism, the judge in chambers may on an application made by the Attorney General, National Security Adviser or Inspector General of Police on the approval of the President, declare any entity to be a proscribed organisation and the notice should be published in the official gazette».

(4) The independent panel shall report as approved for each judicial position all highly qualified persons who make application to the panel, provided that if the number of highly qualified applicants exceeds three times the number of existing vacancies to be filled in such position (determined as of the time the panel renders its report), the independent panel shall report as approved the most highly qualified applicants in a number equal to three times the number of vacancies to be filled in such position, provided further that if the number of highly qualified applicants is less than three times the number of vacancies to be filled in such position the independent panel shall report as approved the most highly qualified applicants in a number equal to not less than two times the number of such vacancies, provided further that the following categories of applicants who are eligible for reelection or reappointment shall be reported as approved if their performance during their term of office merits continuation in office, and no other applicants shall be reported as approved for their vacancies: (a) a judge or justice completing a full term of office seeking re-election to that office, or (b) an interim Supreme Court justice who has been appointed by the Governor to fill an existing vacancy no later than the previous June 1 after approval of the Governor's screening panel, who has been confirmed by the State Senate and has assumed office no later than the date the panel renders its report, and who otherwise would not be required to make application to the independent screening panel pursuant to the provisions of sub-paragraph (3).

Also passed by the Senate — Peter Falk's Law — a measure sponsored by Sen. John DeFrancisco that requires judges who are appointing guardians to oversee the care of sick people to identify all of those individuals, children and other relatives, who are entitled to notice of the incapacitated person's death, funeral and burial arrangements.

Note that there is no relationship (at least legally) between the death penalty and use of weapons by police force; even in countries with death penalty police follows the same Rules of Engagement (use weapon as self - defense or when other people are in danger), death penalty is stablished by a jury or judge (police is a law enforcement agency, sentences are issued by judges or juries)

PROTECT families by supporting proposals that would keep guns out of the wrong hands, including the Extreme Risk Protection Order bill, which would make it possible for families and law enforcement to remove firearms from loved ones who could be a danger to themselves or others, and making permanent Kendra's Law, which grants judges the authority to issue orders that require people who meet certain criteria to regularly undergo psychiatric treatment.

«If the EC had a mind to calm waters and if it really figured out that it wanted to represent the people of this country properly then it would by now craft a statement that in the light of the judge's decision on Paa Kwesi Nduom we have looked at how the event went and we have decided to allow the other participants to come and correct what they did wrong.»

Later we'll be sneering at Cameron and Obama and insisting that everything they do and say is programmed, cynical and insincere and nothing about them is genuine (because we tend to judge other people by our own behaviour).