Sentences with phrase «judged by the importance»

The importance of a credit report can be judged by the importance placed on a person's credit score.

Not exact matches

The document criticizes «doctrinal or disciplinary security,» «an obsession with the law,» «punctilious concern for... doctrine,» «dogmatism,» «hiding behind rules and regulations,» and «a rigid resistance to change,» while reprimanding those who «give excessive importance to certain rules,» overemphasize «ecclesial rules,» believe that «doctrine... is a closed system,» «feel superior to others because they observe certain rules,» have «an answer for every question,» wish to «exercise a strict supervision over others» lives,» «long for a monolithic body of doctrine guarded by all and leaving no room for nuance,» believe that «we give glory to God... simply by following certain ethical norms,» and «look down on others like heartless judges, lording it over them and always trying to teach them lessons.»

Aparently, you are indeed anti-semetic... or just ignorant on the importance of Israel to this country... but ignorance and being anti-semetic, go together... so, please, express your opinion, but do not self declare yourself, let others judge you by what you REALLY say.

For the first time all preconceived ideas about the importance of location are pushed to one side as wines from across the world are judged by style and price exclusively.

The release clause request may just merely be on the ground that the Chilean has an escape route in case he wishes to move and judging by how things are going and his growing importance to the Arsenal setup, it is highly doubtful that he would seek a move soon.

Former President Mahama touted the importance of the Central Region in Ghana's elections, stating, that «[judging by the response to the Unity Walk], the Central Region has shown that the NDC is still alive and kicking.

This table ranks the attributes judged for their importance by supervisors in this year's survey and by postdocs in last year's.

Other than the boozing scene, Miyasaki clearly realizes the importance of teaching lessons to his young audience, as the old «Don't judge a book by its cover» adage is a central theme, as well as several scenes that depict the awful devastation that mankind is leaving on our oceans.

Actually, after a while you begin to wish that John Grisham had written this, as by the halfway mark we realise that The Judge isn't really a courtroom drama but more to do with reminding the audience of the importance of roots and family.

Judging actors» careers by the Academy Awards is the wrong way to look at Hollywood; it places too much importance on who wins Oscars and consequently makes the ridiculous pageantry surrounding the Oscar race less fun to follow along with.

The students were judged the best in such categories as understanding «the importance of civic engagement in a democratic society» and using «technological skills to enhance the value of their projects» by a panel including CEOs of large businesses such as Walgreens and Radio Shack, as well as members of the educational and civic communities.

It is designed to make people recognise their own prejudices, and then question the importance for all information and not judging a book by its cover.

Judge Stephen Johnson, visibly saddened by the Terrell - Norris case, admonished all three parents on the importance of education for their kids.

Judging by this year's new - car introductions at the North American International Auto Show, automakers have rediscovered the importance of having spirit.

The importance of Essay writing - by assigning an essay to the students, universities, and institute basically try to judge the drafting, analytical and conjectural skills of the students.

Pit Crew teams work as ambassadors for their breed, helping to educate the community about dog safety, the humane care of animals, and the importance of never judging a book by its cover.

That was praised by the judges for its «immediacy, visceral intensity and historic importance», combining «a bold political statement with art's ability to articulate fundamental human truths».

The work was praised by the judges for its «immediacy, visceral intensity and historic importance» combining «a bold political statement with art's ability to articulate fundamental human truths».

The judges praised Wallinger directly and Haw by implication for «the immediacy, visceral intensity and historic importance» of a work that «combines a bold political statement with art's ability to articulate fundamental human truths».

The possibility of there existing a plausible model with such a high sensitivity is of such overarching importance, I would have liked to have seen one such model chosen, and to have available all of the standard runs being provided for the IPCC Fourth Assessment by the major modeling centers, in the same format used by those models, so that the climate community could judge for itself the plausibility of this model's climate simulation.

One could argue with my representation of the Yamal series as a set reduced by delta > 2.5, but my point here is that I judge that by looking at the other Yamal factors with the highest deltas some insight might be gained as to the relative importance of the Yamal factors.

In Sharland v Sharland [2015] UKSC 60, [2016] 1 All ER 671 and Gohil v Gohil [2015] UKSC 61, [2016] 1 All ER 685, which were heard at the same time, the Supreme Court had to balance the importance of finality in litigation — in both cases the parties had reached agreement on all matters and had obtained consent orders approved by High Court judges (albeit that the order in Sharland had not been sealed); as against a material failure by a party to comply with their duty of disclosure.

The judge who granted leave to appeal acknowledged the decision's «importance to the profession, as well as to the administration of justice generally», and described the core issue raised by the decision to be whether «pre-approval to use discovery evidence under one of the exceptions contained in [Rule 30.1] is or is not required»: S.C. v. N.S., 2017 ONSC 2601 at para. 8.

13 The analysis was further flawed, according to Ms. M., in that the trial judge failed to analyze the importance of inconsistencies in the testimony given by the three main witnesses.

A fourth issue of transcendental importance is that of permissible damages theories, but the Federal Circuit panel was unanimous (with a very limited exception) and found that Judge Posner had been too strict by excluding the entirety of both parties» damages testimony:

Despite the importance lawyers might place on a motion to compel in a particular case, the fact is it's probably the most routine motion decided by judges.

The risks of predicting a trial court judgment are compounded if the claim goes on appeal where appeal court judges frequently place an importance on facts not regarded as important by the trial judge.

A notable feature of the solution found by the Court seems to be once again the importance given to judicial review and the reliance on judges.

The importance of the issues is highlighted by the fact that the court was constituted of five judges including the president of the Queen's Bench Division, and Sir Mark Potter, president of the Family Division.

In fact, in recent years the most thoughtful and pertinent arguments have been eloquently adumbrated by two prominent Judges in the UK Supreme Court, Jonathan Sumption, recently elevated and Lord Neuberger who's recent speech in Melbourne, Australia reasserted, in his view, the importance of the Human Rights Act and the Convention.

The importance of avoiding or alleviating the parties» or the public's misunderstanding or confusion by supplementing the record to reflect in more detail the reasons in support of the judge's earlier decision.

• An ancient code cited by the International Court of Justice in 1996 and in one of the major constitutional judgments of one jurisdiction where a judge thundered about the fundamental importance of law: «The preservation of the human race itself hinges on law».

In fairness, it should be noted that the Court's reasoning might have reflected the various emphases on the importance of international human rights law and norms by counsel, the different approaches of different judges, or principled distinctions lurking in the background that have not been systematically revealed in the written reasons.

«The majority opinion reflects the persistent disregard in a number of judgments that this Court has issued of the clear and unequivocal directions of the Supreme Court of Canada that emphasize the importance of individualized sentencing and limit appellate intervention in the exercise of sentencing discretion by trial judges.

«It is of sufficient importance to stress it that the crown on this appeal is not asking that the verdict of acquittal be set aside on the ground that the trial judge erred by not giving the proper weight to the evidence for the crown.

... it is of fundamental importance to the rule of law — and to the public's respect not simply for the judicial system, but for the entire machinery of government — that the powers and jurisdictions of the judge be discharged, not only responsibly and fairly, but in accordance with the customs and conventions of Canada's parliamentary democracy, and only as provided by the rules of law governing their employment.

This was not cited as a basis for overturning the settlement, but Judge Posner used the opportunity «to remind the class action bar of the importance of insisting that named plantiffs be genuine fiduciaries, uninfluenced by family ties... or friendships.»

US District Judge Richard Kopf (Neb):» [J] udges obviously know more about the individuals we sentence than many other people [but] the significance of this truism to the statutory goals of sentencing is often zilch... [T] he importance of «knowing the person» is overstated by those who want excuses to do something different than what the Guidelines dictate....

Information about the significant number of aboriginal children in care, the impact of the «60s scoop,» and incidents of poor foster care started to emerge — highlighting the importance of the work being done by the judges in the provincial courts.

In a series of interviews with legal writing expert Bryan Garner, Supreme Court Justices affirmed the importance of briefs to the appellate process and the need for lawyers to write clearly.7 In a recent study, Judge Richard Posner found that judges view writing as equally if not more important than oral advocacy.8 Continuing legal education programs offered by state bar associations frequently address the need for effective legal writing.9 No one disputes that lawyers should write well.10

At the annual eDiscovery Symposium sponsored by the University of Richmond Law School, notable cognoscenti like U.S. Magistrate Judge James Francis and Craig Ball spotlighted the importance of eDiscovery competence.

When the common law is implemented then even the small cases are given full importance and the judges hear for each and every case which was previously unseen or ignored by the parliament or the legislative courts.

A comment from one judge specifically highlights the importance of being careful with humour when people affected by the case are present, even if not directly party to the action: «One has to be very careful about judicial humour because you've got victims and you've got relatives of families».

The Inquiry Committee further notes the paramount importance of judicial independence, and that the Judges Act creates «an extraordinary process that supplements s. 99 (1) of the Constitution» which can not be analogized to other administrative bodies created by Parliament and subject to judicial review (para 32).

En bancreview involves a panel of all eleven FISC judges and must be ordered by a majority of the FISC judges based on a determination that «(i) en banc consideration is necessary to secure or maintain uniformity of the court's decisions; or (ii) the proceeding involves a question of exceptional importance.»

Circles of various sizes represent cases of various degrees of importance (judged by number of citations), with links to and from these precedents of varying thickness depending on the «amount of citations between cases.»

These trials are subject to case management, by the judge who will hear the trial, aimed at providing the parties with that level of process which is proportionate to the importance and complexity of the issues in dispute, and ensuring that matters are ready to proceed when scheduled.

What the case does indicate, however, is that in some cases the parties» agreement will be regarded as having such magnetic importance that the case can be swiftly disposed of by giving effect to the agreement of the parties, saving the judges, the parties and their lawyers a lot of time and keeping costs down to a minimum.

Resumes are judged by the cover letters that they come with, so you can imagine the importance of a good cover letter here.

Addressing the importance of the idea was expressed by Judge Roger Alton Pfaff, presiding judge of the Superior Court of Los Angeles remarked, «California has become a model for conciliation services as a part of the judicial function for other states to emulate and each year we find jurisdictions creating such servJudge Roger Alton Pfaff, presiding judge of the Superior Court of Los Angeles remarked, «California has become a model for conciliation services as a part of the judicial function for other states to emulate and each year we find jurisdictions creating such servjudge of the Superior Court of Los Angeles remarked, «California has become a model for conciliation services as a part of the judicial function for other states to emulate and each year we find jurisdictions creating such services.