Sentences with phrase «judged for such»

The steering has three options and there's some hefty (albeit artificial) weight to it in sport mode, while the brakes are strong but lacking in feel, while the accelerator's sensitivity is excellently judged for such a powerful car.

The overall ride quality seemed very well judged for such a high performance machine.

There was no justification for fast - track appeals for super-injunctions, and the use of specialist judges for such applications was «neither justifiable nor practicable».

Some courts will allow you to see the judge for such matters on scheduled days and some will make an appointment for you.

Not exact matches

Geopolitics will remain a wildcard for the Saudi market, Cook said, but at the moment, the market seems to have priced in the risks, such as the recent missiles fired by Yemen, or judged them to be, on balance, not pressing.

Wrote the learned judge: «The potential for the use of phrases such as «this is a horse of a different colour»... jump out at one.

Tired of being judged on dating apps such as Tinder solely for your looks?

The addicts can't actually ask a judge to imprison them — but they can have a relative, probation officer, or doctor ask a judge to commit them for their own good and decline to protest such a request.

When such charges are filed, a judge issues a same - day restraining order and a hearing is scheduled for three weeks out to figure out a longer - term solution.

Another blow for Facebook in Europe: Judges in Belgium have once again ruled the company broke privacy laws by deploying technology such as cookies and social plug - ins to track internet users across the web.

As my PaidContent colleague Jeff John Roberts reported last month, Harris» attempt to have this court order struck down failed for a somewhat unusual reason: namely, the judge hearing the case decided that Harris did not have any legal interest in the tweets he sent, because such rights only apply to things a user actually owns — and users do not own their tweets for the purposes of the U.S. Constitution.

Gail is also an active start - up judge and mentor in Boston for such organizations as Mass - Challenge, Boston University, Harvard Business School, and IBM.

Trump criticized judges in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit, saying his presidency would reshape the judiciary and change courts such as that one.

SUSPENDED: A U.S. judge has ruled the China branches of global accounting firms should be barred from providing audits for U.S. - traded companies in a dispute that might force major corporate names such as oil giant PetroChina and search engine Baidu to...

BEIJING (AP)-- An American judge has ruled the China arms of global accounting firms should be barred from providing audits for U.S. - traded companies in a dispute that might force major corporate names such as oil giant PetroChina and search engine...

The Project brings together scholars, judges, and journalists for roundtable discussions on topics such as the American religious tradition and the role of tradition in law and politics.

To argue that historians might judge such and such to be a miracle because they believe antecedently in the religion that regards such miracles as signs of the intervention of its deity is to open the floodgates for all religious claims to miracles and, indeed, even to nonreligious «miracles» such as the widespread reports that people have seen Elvis Presley.

As former Nixon economics adviser Herbert Stein observed, President Bush has made economic growth the acid test by which every other policy is to be judged, believing that such growth will permit progress on other fronts, including raising the standard of living for the poor.

Dreams, for example, were given a high place as media of divine revelation; (Genesis 20:3; 26:24 - 25; 28:10 - 16; 31:24; 37:5; 41:1; 46:1 - 4; Judges 7:13 - 15; I Kings 3:5 - 15 etc.) omens were trusted, such as the first word to be uttered at an expected meeting, (I Samuel 14:8 - 15) or a chance action regarded as a sign, (Genesis 24:12 - 14) or wind in the mulberry - trees taken as Yahweh's command to join battle; (II Samuel 5:22 - 24) and, in general, dealing with the superhuman world suggested nothing so simple and spiritual as private communion in prayer, but rather a whole array of magical techniques and, from the modern point of view, incredible superstitions.

So long as Christianity knows the Crucifixion as a vicarious sacrifice for a totally guilty humanity, as the innocent sacrifice of the eternal Son of God to a just but merciful Father, it can never celebrate the definitive victory of the Crucifixion; for such a redeemed humanity remains in bondage to the transcendent Judge, and must continue to be submissive to his distant and alien authority, ever pleading for mercy when it falls away from his absolute command.

(Matthew 6:8) Prayer was not begging a reluctant deity for his best gifts, as though he were an unjust judge or a surly neighbor in bed with his children unwilling to arise and answer a call for help — although if patience in prayer could accomplish its end even in such cases, how much more with the righteous and merciful God!

Recognition of this fact is essential both for tolerance in judging others and such clearness as we can have in judging ourselves.

Such a temptation would have some relevance for the early church (Acts 8:18 - 19); but judging by all we know about Jesus, we may be sure that no such interest would have presented any temptation to him at Such a temptation would have some relevance for the early church (Acts 8:18 - 19); but judging by all we know about Jesus, we may be sure that no such interest would have presented any temptation to him at such interest would have presented any temptation to him at all.

Insofar as such a Christian is undergoing a full encounter with history he can by no means be judged to be non-Christian, for it is precisely the meditation between faith and history that lies at the center of the Christian faith.

But if there was, he would be judging you for judging others and making such hasty statements about people that he «hates».

To claim that firearms alone are exempt from such regulation as might be judged necessary for the common good is to speak self - serving nonsense.

When you see a young woman, addicted to drugs, living on the street, selling her body for the next hit, though you should judge her actions as wrong, be merciful and say, «There, but for the grace of God, go I.» Such an attitude will enable you to help her rather than condemn her.

I like to think that those apologists who endorse the view of god as an indiscriminate killer of children and infants will be judged for their lack of compassion and their embrace of such defamatory stories.

Rather than looking to the past for answers to our problems we must let the past start posing the questions and setting the terms, not in order to adopt such questions uncritically but in order to judge our own thinking.

To avoid such a possibility, deductivists have often set up unfalsifiable criteria for judging an error to be error (e. g., must be in the nonexistent autograph; must be proved beyond doubt).

He takes me to task for saying, «There may be a natural law, but we are not agreed upon what it is, and there is no such law that gives definite answers to a judge trying to decide a case.»

Although the judge's decision did not deal with whether or not the sexual abuse actually happened, this latest turn of events is something of a victory for SGM, whose legal strategy has been to first argue that the First Amendment gives pastors the right to discourage victims of abuse from reporting the crimes against them to police and second to argue that the case should be thrown out on technicalities, such as the statute of limitations.

As Bultmann uses them, the former refers to an event so far as it is significant for human existence (e.g., the cross as the salvation - occurrence through which I understand myself as judged and forgiven by God), while the latter refers to an event considered in abstraction from such significance (e.g., the cross as an incident in the annals of ancient history).»

Kass's ambitious use of the term — as a clear standard for determining what is right and wrong and in keeping with our nature, and for judging the course of biomedicine — strikes me as impossible for such a soft and abstract concept.

But the process of ecumenical and interreligious dialogue that Pope Benedict XVI has repeatedly endorsed may cause participants to question whether any canonical story of violence — such as the conquest narratives in Joshua and Judges, or functionally equivalent texts in the history of Islam — may legitimately be claimed to offer a religious warrant for continued violence in today's world.

To work for such communal and institutional embodiments of justice and fraternity is to serve the kingdom of God, even though that kingdom far transcends them and all are judged.

It was inevitable that success such as is related of these champions would give them lifelong prestige, and so they «judged Israel» variously for ten, twenty, or forty years.

For a better understanding of Christian Terms such as Born - Again we invite you to read the articles «Born of God» and «Judging ~ Born Again» on our website http://www.aworlddeceived.ca

As you may have heard, last week the Southern Baptist Convention responded to pastor Rob Bell's controversial book, Love Wins, with a resolution declaring that «the Bible clearly teaches that God will judge the lost at the end of the age,» and that such judgment will include the «conscious, eternal suffering» for all non-Christians.

The parables disclose with what pleasure and tolerance he surveyed the broad scene of human activity: the merchant seeking pearls; the farmer sowing his fields; the real - estate man trying to buy a piece of land in which he had secret reason to believe a treasure lay buried; the dishonest secretary, who had been given notice, making friends against the evil day among his employer's debtors by reducing their obligations; the five young women sleeping with lamps burning while the bridegroom tarried and unable to attend the marriage because their sisters who had had foresight enough to bring additional oil refused to lend them any; the rich man whose guests for dinner all made excuses; the man comfortably in bed with his children who gets up at midnight to help his importunate neighbor only because he despairs of getting rid of him otherwise; the king who is out to capture a city; the man who built his house upon the sand and lost it in the first storm of wind and rain; the queer employer who pays all of his men the same wage whether they have worked the whole day or a single hour; the great lord who going to a distant land entrusts his property to his three servants and judges them by the success of their investments when he returns; the shepherd whose sheep falls into a ditch; the woman with ten pieces of silver who, losing one, lights the candle and sweeps diligently till she finds it, and makes the finding of it the occasion of a celebration in which all of her neighbors are invited to share — and how long such a list might be!

In case Abraham is not a nullity, a phantom, a show one employs for a pastime, then the fault can never consist in the fact that the sinner wants to do likewise, but the point is to see how great a thing it was that Abraham did, in order that man may judge for himself whether he has the call and the courage to be subjected to such a test.

It is easy to see how these Christians come to such a conclusion, especially when the Bible has several examples of storms and famines sent by God to judge people for their disobedience.

Such a perfect judge would also have to be omniscient, for he would have to know an infinitely complex law and know the infinitely many ways people can fall short of that law.

The perfect judge would have to apply an infinitely complex law, so that each person under the law would be held to a standard that is individually tailored to his situation: «Anyone who was born on May 23 at 2:53 p.m. at 1128 Main St. and whose first sight was of a quite pretty nurse named Amy whose hands were slightly cold...» and so on, telling the exact story of your life in literally every detail, ``... any such person ought to have been able to control his temper upon discovering that the morning newspaper was wet from the rain, but could not be expected to remember to buy a card for his sister's sixteenth birthday.»

When God identifies something as sin, such as taking a bribe (See: Deuteronomy), I am not judging when I say that a leader is wrong for taking a bribe.

Hal a fool such as yourself can not judge the claims of the Bible.I didn't present them for your approval because I had no doubts this would be the outcome just presented them for the sane and logical ones that understand truth but thanks for reading anyway

It has proven very difficult for judges and politicians to resist this trend, especially when it comes to horrific crimes such as the Oklahoma City bombing: at McVeigh's trial 38 witnesses described in heartbreaking detail how this event destroyed their lives.

I can't believe for one second a «man of God» would say such a thing but hey, I can't judge him so I'll just have to pray is ignorance away for him.

however, he entered the military, he gave up his rights for the rules of the military... he could be hung for such disobedince... the military has its own laws, lawers, judges, everything — and this man broke one.

Our 1996 symposium on judicial usurpation and subsequent articles were criticized for being alarmist; but the Florida Supreme Court changed many minds, and I now note that even worthies such as George Will are using the feared R - word, referring to the «regime» of lawless law - making by judges.