Sentences with phrase «judges and juries understand»

We combine state of the art evidence along with industry - specific experts to help mediators, judges and juries understand why an accident happened and why the defendant is responsible for its consequences.

She is known for her master storytelling and inherent ability to translate complex technical jargon into relatable conversational terms that both judges and juries understand.

Before criminal trials start to rely on the newer features of dating apps, such as sexual health history and HIV status categories, we need to come up with a way to ensure judges and juries understand how nuanced this evidence might be.

Not exact matches

When a scientist's knowledge is used to help lawyers, juries, and judges understand the results of scientific tests, the scientist becomes a forensic scientist.

I often act as a «teacher» to clearly convey the evidence which falls into my realm of expertise, based in science and fact, to assist the judge and / or jury in understanding the evidence at hand, in essence, act as an advocate for the truth.

What you fail to understand again and again is that you are not the judge and jury in regards to scientific evidence and the scientific method.

What this means to the modern practitioner is that all players in the game (attorneys, clients, judges and juries), now share the same understanding and appreciation of not only the meaning of the term legal malpractice, but its role in maintaining the balance between the attorney's prerogatives in selecting strategy and tactics and the clients» right to competent, ethical representation.

Our attorneys understand complex technology and can explain it to a judge, jury, arbitrator or mediator.

No matter how complex your case may be, we have the ability to untangle the legal issues and present your case in simple terms that a judge or jury can understand.

In the courtroom, our trial presentation software allows for cutting edge presentation of evidence to the Judge and jury, an important tool in helping them to understand otherwise complex medical and evidentiary issues.

The experts can assist the judge and jury in understanding the nuances of a case.

As America's most - cited judge, Judge Richard Posner, put it last year, «Judges have difficulty understanding modern technology and jurors have even greater difficulty, yet patent plaintiffs tend to request trial by jury because they believe that jurors tend to favor patentees, believing that they must be worthy inventors defending the fruits of their invention against copycats -LSB-...]&rajudge, Judge Richard Posner, put it last year, «Judges have difficulty understanding modern technology and jurors have even greater difficulty, yet patent plaintiffs tend to request trial by jury because they believe that jurors tend to favor patentees, believing that they must be worthy inventors defending the fruits of their invention against copycats -LSB-...]&raJudge Richard Posner, put it last year, «Judges have difficulty understanding modern technology and jurors have even greater difficulty, yet patent plaintiffs tend to request trial by jury because they believe that jurors tend to favor patentees, believing that they must be worthy inventors defending the fruits of their invention against copycats -LSB-...]».

In the case of litigation where infringement and validity of the patent are at issue, my degree provides a technical foundation which helps me fully understand the invention so I can distil relatively complex technology into more easily understandable arguments to present to a judge or jury who often do not have a technical background.

Jim feels that you have to understand who you are before you can better understand judges, people on juries, prosecutors, witnesses and clients.

Criminal Law: Provocation R. v. Bouchard, 2013 ONCA 791 (35690) Judgment rendered Oct. 16, 2014 Cromwell J. — «We agree with [the] majority of [the C.A.], that the trial judge's instructions may well have led the jury to understand that the deceased's allegedly provocative acts and the respondent's reaction to them had relevance to the mens rea issue only if they met the narrow legal definition of provocation in s. 232 of the Criminal Code and that this constituted misdirection».

You were in court listening to a judge trying to explain some principle of law to a jury, without using the words or phrases «trust me», «it's magic», «think of it like religion, you don't have to understand, just accept and believe» or «abracadbra»?

Reasons included (1) judges «grade on a curve» and, after sitting through 20 cases involving violent crimes, might not find a more minor crime as serious whereas a jury would not share this context; (2) defendants will select those judges who they believe will be more inclined to acquit; (3) judges are bound by fixed sentencing rules so rather than sentence a defendant of a nonserious crime to a lengthy term they avoid that dilemma through acquittal; (4) judges might better understand the complex elements of certain corporate crimes and, unlike a jury, would recognize when the prosecution failed to carry its burden and (5) some judges may just have something against prosecutors.

It is encouraging to see that judges and juries also understand the loss.

Many judges see themselves as overworked and underpaid (and some are right), and juries can deliver irrational results, particularly as the average juror does not understand business cases.

We work closely with attorneys to understand the issues in the case and to determine what analysis within our areas of expertise will help the judge or jury answer questions regarding liability and damages.

When the adverse party is unwilling to treat clients fairly, attorney Doane knows how to present the facts in a way that judges and juries can understand.

I understand the legal argument that the Supreme Court's work in the 1949 Williams case and the 1997 Watts case suggests that the Constitution permits judges enhancing sentences based on conduct that the jury rejected as a basis for a conviction.

We use state - of - the - art visual and tactile tools to communicate sophisticated medical concepts in a manner that is easy to understand for the judge and jury.

We also understand how best to present the nature and extent of your damages to a judge and jury.

As for the concept that juries have not only the power but the obligation to nullify unjust rulings of a judge, John Adams wrote, «It is not only [the juror's] right, but his duty... to find the verdict according to his own best understanding, judgment, and conscience, though in direct opposition to the direction of the court.»

Our litigation lawyers are able to offer clients the benefit of global experience and familiarity with local courts and practices, which enables us to present complex technology issues in a form that any judge or jury can understand.

Succeeding at patent litigation requires translating difficult technical concepts into stories, language and concepts that judges and juries can understand.

Your lawyer needs to understand all of the complicated medical issues in the case and must also know how to best communicate this information to a judge or jury.

By using technology, judges and juries will be able to better understand who you are, and the facts and circumstances of your case.

They tell me simple timeline visuals, rather than complex legal charts, are more helpful in getting judges, juries and mediators to understand their case evidence better, but also to remember it better.

We understand that it will take a team of professionals to help prove to the Court, the Judge, the Jury and help the insurer understand the nature of the injury and how it impacts the accident victim's daily life.

The injury lawyers of Goldfinger Law work with a variety of medical experts to ensure that the insurance company, the Judge and the Jury truly understand and appreciate the nexus of your pain and how it impacts your life.

2 For an extensive list of studies demonstrating the competence of juries, see, e.g., Testimony of Neil Vidmar, Russell M. Robinson, II Professor of Law, Duke Law School before The Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions, «Hearing on Medical Liability: New Ideas for Making the System Work Better for Patients,» June 22, 2006 at 10 («The overwhelming number of the judges gave the civil jury high marks for competence, diligence, and seriousness, even in complex cases... Systematic studies of jury responses to experts lead to the conclusion that jurors do not automatically defer to experts and that jurors have a basic understanding of the evidence in malpractice and other cases.

«If the former, then experts may need further training and perhaps judges should allow different types of evidence to help juries understand, for example, videos or demonstration aids.

Our engineers are specifically trained to deal with pedestrian and car accidents so that the Court, Judge and Jury gets a proper understanding of how the accident happened, and who's fault the accident is.

The historian Wraxall was distinctly sceptical: «Erskine successfully undertook to spurn at precedents... to appal or silence the judges themselves; to intimidate, convince or seduce the juries; to appeal from the understanding to the feelings... finally, to lead captive his audience, and to carry the cause that he defended or espoused, by extorting a sort of voluntary submission, sometimes yielded almost in defiance of evidence, facts, belief or conviction.»

And it is not unknown for juries to not understand the Judge's observations, leaving them no choice but to acquit.

In assessing the adequacy of a jury charge, the Court of Appeal must ask if the jury would have understood the issues of fact, the relevant legal principles, how the facts relate to the law, and the positions of the parties based on the trial judge's remarks.

You understand and agree that by entering into this Agreement you and TopResume are each waiving the right to a jury trial or a trial before a judge in a public court.