Sentences with phrase «judges are human beings»

Judges are human beings, and we want them to be human beings.

Remember that judges are human beings, too, and we can't expect them to live isolated lives in glass houses.

The reality is that judges are human beings; they do not descend from on high, vested with an innate ability to discern truth from falsehood.

«Judges are human beings, who bring their life experiences, their preconceptions, and prior considered judgements to the bench.

While the court system is designed to provide a standardized experience for litigants, your judge is a human being at the end of the day.

Not exact matches

In other words, as humans, we are intrinsically inclined to judge people.

Jesus's parable of the sheep and goats proclaims that God will judge human beings on how they treat the «least of these»: the hungry, thirsty, stranger, immigrant, ill - clothed, and imprisoned.

If we judge a civilization's success by its endurance over time, then the Bushmen are the most successful society in human history.

Two closed trial sessions took place on August 22 and September 24 in the Islamic Revolutionary Court of Judge Abolqasem Salavati, who is known to human rights organizations for being an instrument of Iran's security apparatus.

Redin says the idea of consumers being human - centric, judging brands the way they judge people, could give indications of how best to develop a sustainability and marketing strategy.

Consumers are ready to judge a shampoo brand based on characteristics they would apply to a human being: integrity, honesty, trustworthiness.

You can see the ethical dilemma in a basic - income experiment: You're toying with people's financial health, and, by judging your endpoints based on feelings, you're tinkering with and assessing human behavior.

The human brain is hardwired to judge.

In determining the recently released annual Best Workplaces in Canada list, «the judging panel is the employees, and the rest of the results are based on a company's human resource practices,» says Jose Tolovi Neto, director of the Great Place to Work Institute Canada.

Since his last re-election, Clarke has openly supported Republican causes on local and national right - wing media outlets; proudly trumpets on official Milwaukee County letterhead his 2013 award from the Constitutional Sheriffs and Peace Officers Association, whose leader suggested using women and children as human shields during Nevada rancher Cliven Bundy's standoff with federal agents; accused Milwaukee County Executive Chris Abele of having «penis envy» and being on heroin when crafting the county budget and needing to be drug tested; blasted Milwaukee County District Attorney John Chisholm and Chief Judge Jeffrey Kremers for being «soft on crime»; provided minimal protection for President Obama during his 2012 visit; employs former Scott Walker spokeswoman Fran McLaughlin, who was given criminal immunity over her role in Walker's mixing of campaign and county business; and created pro-gun public service announcements.

And I think I don't know anybody who's had a generally better record than Berkshire in judging business quality and the human quality, the people who are going to lead the business after it's acquired.

But it is one thing to state that all human beings have some access to God's law within and through human nature, quite another to expect natural law theories based on reason alone to persuade others about contested moral issues in a context where such theories are stripped of their foundations in God as creator, lawgiver, and judge.

It is humans who try to explain and judge it based on limited understanding.

If there is a God and he is truly just, he will judge me based on my merits of helping fellow humans and making the world a better place to live, not how many times I dropped to my knees, clapped my hands together and chanted prayers.

Our behavior in society and how humans judge «right» and «wrong» is based in the culture in which we are raised.

Back in the «50s, technologist Alan Turing said that true artificial intelligence would be a reality if a computer could fool a significant number of those judging (like more than 30 percent) into making them believe they were talking to a fellow human.

For example, advocates of autonomy might defend euthanasia as death with dignity, while most Christian teaching judges euthanasia and physician - assisted suicide to be actions beneath and against human dignity.

There is no evidence of a god or that it will judge us at the end of life or that it monitors every human every second of its life recording every thought, word, and action.

Here we find the pope's great worry: At precisely the moment for the world's great evangelization and the great manifestation of love, the devices by which the world has been prepared — economic and technological — are excluding the charity and denying the truth that «judge and direct» human development.

It is the soul that we have to purify whether being religious or not religious to live in a code of understanding as the only judge is God and no human is to judge another although might try to guide but not hart..

One major reason that the military should not turn cases of military - to - military sex abuse, is that we have a right to be judged by our peers... who understand what the mil life does to the human mind.

I'm not dogmatic about Judas» final fate, that one was up to God — but consider the possibility that God doesn't judge things in the same manner that we humans do.

These considerations are made even more relevant because of present United States commitments to international treaties on human rights, which could conceivably, at some time, put United States positive laws relating to abortion and the judges who implement them at variance with and in violation of a future international consensus on that issue.»

It means being there when you need them, loving you, and caring about you as a human, not judging you.

What makes human - kind special is the ability to accept others for who they are and not judge.

ESCR scientists are mounting a furious political assault against the lawsuit, currently back in Royce Lamberth's court urging that human embryonic stem cell research continue to be funded by the Feds, hoping to pressure the judge to see it their way.

Though I think judging an empire as a whole — as if it is a human being — is a mistake.

It's just part of being human * shrug * we all judge others, even those of us who know better.

in HUMAN perspective it seems immoral cause YOU and I are not the judges over someones life... and MIGHT is OT Gods only attribute..

nobody has a right to mock about others, you are judged by your actions and deeds, it's not possible to know about every faith in this world, but how ignorant can human mankind be especially after innocent Sikhs killed in Oak creek Wisconsin which was very widely covered.

As Russell Hittinger has shown in his book The First Grace: Rediscovering the Natural Law in a Post-Christian Society (see chapter four), St. Thomas's point is not that the judge corrects a flawed human law in favor of the natural law.

The theological issues are far from resolved; but, judging from what has happened in Bloomington, even conservative Christians (though traditionally among those most opposed to gay civil rights) are learning that theological concerns need not blind any of us to the needs and rights of homosexuals as human beings.

Morally, as Ruether has noted, the individual is ambivalent, fundamentally good but capable of great evil; consequently, a feminist critique must keep hold of a judging as well as an affirming dimension if it is truly to respond to the human condition.

Understanding this new perspective on church is as difficult today as it was in the days of Jesus for Jews to understand a different perspective on Sabbath, but the basic principles seem to be the same: Church, just like Sabbath, is not supposed to be a bunch of human traditions which have become legalistic laws by which to judge one another's spiritual maturity.

The Judge: Excuse me for being somewhat philosophical, but how can human beings be free if you constantly have to hold their ladders.

Yes, it is true that God made man for woman, but we humans who has been born for the short time we are here must not judge each other for our indifferences and beliefs; we must help each other dodge the evils of this world and come together as the children of God.

I see you are against judging, execpt for the part where you say, «Silly human, you are a stain to christianity».

Being judged by a human is different than being judged by a non-proven dBeing judged by a human is different than being judged by a non-proven dbeing judged by a non-proven deity.

And she «really likes gays more than Republicans» and she designed humans 14 billion years ago to have free choice so what they do «is up to them» and others have NO right to judge them..

Every human being on this earth has been given a spirit and an ego; to love or hate, to believe or not believe, to judge or be judged., reflects our human life.

Since no way exists to judge which image is closest to reality he said, the only nonnegotiable fact is that Jesus had a human face.

They are still stuck in the Old Testament and though they claim to know Yeshua, they haven't met Him yet, not everyone, but the ones who judge and can not accept another human being for what he or she really are.

If something so important for each individual is dependent upon accepting / rejecting a supposed scriptural «truth» (as you define it) then make the case for how it makes any sense at all that humans would be judged negatively for rejecting something they have no idea exists!!

Disease and early mortality, which were understandably judged to be evil, nonetheless kept in check the natural increase in human population.

Spanning the entire spectrum of creation, whether in terms of sex, politics, or religion, Christians affirm that God is speaking through the law written on human hearts, with individual consciences picking up the signals, either accusing or excusing them, until that day when God will finally judge all things by the criterion of Jesus Christ (Romans 1:15 — 16).