Not exact matches
If one parent in a joint legal custody arrangement takes decision - making
powers away from the other parent (perhaps by making unilateral decisions about a child's
education), the other parent can go back to court to get a
judge to enforce the joint legal custody order.
Leaving aside the question of whether this is simply due to easier exams, it's clear that this increased «attainment» is not resulting in greater employability — so the reported 65 % increase in
education funding since Labour came to
power can not be
judged a good investment, by any stretch of the imagination.
This one
judge in Jackson will have essentially unchecked
power on all
education related decisions affecting the state, and you, the voter, will be disenfranchised from the
education making process.
They contend the legislature has failed to «fully fund»
education, so the initiative would take that
power from the legislature and give it to a Hinds County Chancery
Judge.
If a school is
judged to be progressing towards expected educational standards before it converts to an academy, then the secretary of state has the
power to revoke the academy order and will consider this on a case - by - case basis, according to the Department for
Education.
[Tweet «Initiative 42 gives one
judge in Jackson essentially unchecked
power on all
education decisions.»]
In his «historic» call for «
education reform», an end to teacher tenure and a disproportionate transfer of public dollars to charter schools the Governor failed to point out that (1) Connecticut already has one of the longest probationary periods for teachers in the country — four years — which gives school administrators more opportunity to judge a teacher's capability than do those in most other states and that (2) in 2010 the Legislature adopted major revisions to the teacher evaluation process that already gives Malloy's Department of Education the power to revamp how teachers are evaluated and require school administrators to actually conduct appropriate eva
education reform», an end to teacher tenure and a disproportionate transfer of public dollars to charter schools the Governor failed to point out that (1) Connecticut already has one of the longest probationary periods for teachers in the country — four years — which gives school administrators more opportunity to
judge a teacher's capability than do those in most other states and that (2) in 2010 the Legislature adopted major revisions to the teacher evaluation process that already gives Malloy's Department of
Education the power to revamp how teachers are evaluated and require school administrators to actually conduct appropriate eva
Education the
power to revamp how teachers are evaluated and require school administrators to actually conduct appropriate evaluations.
He calls it a «blended separation of
powers» approach: It hinges on the willingness of state
judges to work with governors and state lawmakers — over the long term, if necessary — to set high standards, develop effective programs, calculate the cost of a quality
education for all, create fair funding systems and assess student progress.
Transition Lab was selected as both the
judges and popular choice winner for «Best Local Solution» for addressing climate change in the 2013 MIT Climate CoLab competition, as a «replicable grassroots
education teaching the skills and mindset for local resilience,
powered by new and viable economic models.»
SJR 42 provides the commission has
powers of censure, removal, and retirement, plus «public admonition, warning, reprimand, censure, or requirement that [the
judge] obtain additional training or
education.»
Juror
education activists have been out several times already this year in Bellingham, Washington and elsewhere around the state to teach everyone about the
power jurors have that prosecutors and
judges don't want them to know about.
A decision by the Alberta Court of Appeal last week has some wondering if
judges need more
education around the
powers of devices they themselves probably use every day.