on Bills for mandatory recusal of
judges for campaign contributions introduced in 3 states this year; hearing on one bill later this week
Not exact matches
In a session before U.S. Magistrate
Judge Michael J. Roemer, a newly unsealed FBI complaint alleges Pigeon conspired to solicit a $ 25,000
contribution to the Cuomo
campaign from a Montreal - based internet gambling company
for whom his Papi Holdings LLC earned $ 388,000 in lobbying fees from 2010 to 2015.
State Supreme Court
Judge Bernard Malone ruled that though the Soares
campaign was not at fault
for taking the money, WFP violated the law in making
contributions to another party's primary candidate.
A federal
judge on Tuesday sentenced Dinesh D'Souza to five years of probation, including eight months in a community confinement center, ordering no jail time
for the conservative author and pundit who pleaded guilty to using straw donors to make an illegal
campaign contribution.
A federal
judge who spared Dinesh D'Souza prison time
for illegal -
campaign contributions shot down the conservative filmmaker's nervy request to push back reporting to a halfway house until after January...
The project aims to make judicial elections more transparent
for journalists and researchers by creating online profiles of
judges that show
campaign contributions, judicial opinions and biographies.
A
judge of the New York Surrogate's Court was censured
for failing to properly report a
campaign contribution from her long - time friend and mentor.
The petition sought to amend the recusal rules when a party in an action — or the lawyer or law firm in an action — makes a
campaign contribution to or spends money in a judicial
campaign for a
judge presiding in the case.
SB 6255 Requires mandatory recusal
for judges who receive $ 50 or more in
campaign contributions from lawyers or parties in past 3 years.
In 2013, the legislature repealed the state's renowned public financing program
for judicial candidates, leaving would - be
judges to raise
contributions from wealthy
campaign donors.
Further, according to Comment 5 to Rule 2.11, a
judge has a duty to disclose information that litigants might find relevant to a disqualification motion, like whether either the parties or their lawyers have made
campaign contributions, even if the
judge believes there is no basis
for disqualification.
Week ahead: mandatory recusal
for Illinois
judges receiving
campaign contributions over $ 500, court technology fees in NH, stripping Arkansas Supreme Court of rulemaking authority
denied, 541 U.S. 960 (2004): A probate
judge who ran
for state senate was charged with violating canons prohibiting sitting
judges from accepting
campaign contributions and requiring
judges to resign from the bench before running
for political office.
The plaintiffs challenged eight restrictions on judicial conduct: 1) the prohibition on judicial candidates
campaigning as a member of a political organization, 2) the prohibition on judicial candidates making speeches
for or against political organizations or candidates, 3) the ban on judicial candidates making
contributions to political causes or candidates, 4) the prohibition on judicial candidates from publicly endorsing or opposing candidates
for public office, 5) the prohibition on
judges from acting as a leader or holding office in a policitical organization, 6) the prohibition on judicial candidates knowingly or recklessly making false statements during
campaigns, 7) the ban on judicial candidates making misleading statements, and 8) the prohibition on candidates making pledges, promises, or committments in connection with cases, controversies, or issues that are likely to come before the court.
(9) use or permit the use of
campaign contributions for the private benefit of the
judge, the candidate, or others;
The reasons a
judge might refuse to ask
for or accept
campaign contributions are multiple.