Sentences with phrase «judges in these cases put»

And there is very much this sense, as one of the Court of Appeal judges in these cases put it, that reopening these cases would make our judicial system grind increasingly slowly, so the response to the fact that the judicial system is underfunded — needs more judges, needs more court time, needs more investment — is to say no to cases and to refuse to open cases rather than to fund the system more and the upshot of that of course, is a reduced access to justice.

Not exact matches

The judge found that «none of the allegedly false statements put at issue in the complaint are adequate» to sustain the former workers» case.

Despite the fact that at least five of the judges involved in the two appeal court judgements were originally appointed to lower courts by Brian Mulroney's Conservative government, Harper insisted: «It was the government that decided to put the judges on the bench, the government that decided not to appeal, the government that decided to lose the case and the government that decided not to come back to Parliament.

They had the courts do it for them; they put the judges in they wanted, then they failed to appeal, failed to fight the case in court.»

Her appearance Thursday before Pakistan's Supreme Court was put off when one of the three judges in the case recused himself.

In that case, US District Judge Esther Salas granted a temporary stay to deportations in response to a lawsuit put forth by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLUIn that case, US District Judge Esther Salas granted a temporary stay to deportations in response to a lawsuit put forth by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLUin response to a lawsuit put forth by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU).

Rumore said a State Supreme Court judge has now ordered a stay in the case, putting a hold on start time changes at the school and New York State Education Commissioner MaryEllen Elia will decide if Cash has the authority to make the adjustment.

This decision was reaffirmed in 2008 by Suffolk County Court in the case of Colaiacovo v. Dormer with Judge Gary J. Weber stating, «Simply put, the State of New York and its agencies are no longer in a position to require that a handgun be stored in an inoperable condition or otherwise locked up if it is otherwise legally present in the owner's dwelling.»

Mr Koky Anyidoho was optimistic that in the face of fairness and good judgment, he will also be given a Judge to quickly look into the issue as he put it «about Bawumia's attempt to burn and destroy this nation through criminal act by providing a fake document to mislead a public officer» in this case the Electoral Commission.

He said when he appeared before court last Thursday, he was told by Kelly to put in writing the reasons why he thought having Kelly judge the case constituted a conflict of interest.

«As far as assumption goes, he was to me, at the time of his contact, still employed by the Nigerian Institute of Advanced Legal Studies; he never informed me that he had moved on to become a Judge of any court in Nigeria, and I had never throughout my own career as a legal practitioner or public functionary ever appeared in any case before any judge whatsoever at the National Industrial Court, or attended any function of the National Industrial Court, that would have put me on notice that the Agbadu - Fishim I used to know had become a judge of the National Industrial CJudge of any court in Nigeria, and I had never throughout my own career as a legal practitioner or public functionary ever appeared in any case before any judge whatsoever at the National Industrial Court, or attended any function of the National Industrial Court, that would have put me on notice that the Agbadu - Fishim I used to know had become a judge of the National Industrial Cjudge whatsoever at the National Industrial Court, or attended any function of the National Industrial Court, that would have put me on notice that the Agbadu - Fishim I used to know had become a judge of the National Industrial Cjudge of the National Industrial Court.

The surprise arrangement, signed off by state Attorney General Eric Schneiderman and an Albany County judge on Friday afternoon, put to an end Maziarz's corruption trial scheduled for next week in a case in which he was facing five felony counts.

Cuomo put on a good show — asking and answering his own hypotheticals, shouting to emphasize his seriousness — in claiming that he's doing the apolitical thing by handing the cases off to an independent counsel, retired state judge Judith Kaye.

Early on, Judge Valerie Caproni chided Bharara for his comments to the media about the case, putting prosecutors on notice for «brinkmanship» in its «media blitz.»

The judge, who previously put Hassan on probation in another case, reviewed additional information about Hassan, including that law enforcement has designated him a suspected gang member.

But it was clear late on Thursday, with the parties and the judge seated around a conference table and the jury not present, that Mr. McDonald and Mr. Kry had critical roles as legal specialists in the case — «the law guys,» as several experts put it — a role the public rarely hears about.

A federal judge in San Francisco, California, put off a ruling in a key case on genetically modified beets.

We meet Evelyn (Judi Dench) as the recent widow who discovers her beloved husband left her a mountain of debt; Douglas and Jean (Bill Nighy and Penelope Wilton) a hapless married couple who have invested their savings into their daughter's internet company; Muriel (Maggie Smith) is a racist and longtime housekeeper for the rich who has been put out to pasture while in need of a new hip; Graham (Tom Wilkinson) is a high court judge who is fed up with responsibility and seeking to reconnect with a long ago lover; Madge (Celia Imrie) and Norman (Ronald Pickup) are the lonely hearts looking for love, or in his case, loving.

Any school district bold enough to confront OCR and clever enough to get its case before a federal judge will put the equity DCL in serious legal jeopardy.

Put differently, Judge Smith ruled that the plaintiffs» did have legitimate claims regarding how EVAAS use in HISD was a violation of their Fourteenth Amendment due process protections (i.e., no state or in this case organization shall deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process).

Richard Hunter, the director of Houston's U.S. Marshals office, said that enforcing student loan defaults puts a strain on their resources, and were candid that Hughes seemed to stand out among judges in his handling of these cases.

The federal judge overseeing the case put it on a fast track and the ASPCA was able to take disposition of the dogs in July.

Or, as a judge in a somewhat parallel case — the «children's lawsuit» against the federal government — put it:

If the judge rules in our favor, we will be able to make our case before the court that the federal government must put a nation - wide climate recovery plan in place.

[26] In a case such as this, the essence of the complaint is not that the reasons are functionally insufficient — the parties agree that on their face, the reasons explain what was decided and provide a basis for appellate review — but rather that the judge's wholesale incorporation of the material of others shows that he did not put his mind to the issues and decide them impartially.

However, proving a case against a negligent truck driver or trucking company may not be as easy as putting all available evidence in front of the judge or jury.

That sums up the complex legal questions put forward to the summary Judge Mr Floris Bakels in a case that may have severe consequences for the rights of Britons living on the continent.

I live in a country in which these cases are put only before professional judges.

In R v Milton Brown [1998] EWCA Crim 1486 Lord Bingham said that in an appropriate case it was open to the judge to ask an unrepresented criminal defendant whether there were matters he wished to have put to a witnesIn R v Milton Brown [1998] EWCA Crim 1486 Lord Bingham said that in an appropriate case it was open to the judge to ask an unrepresented criminal defendant whether there were matters he wished to have put to a witnesin an appropriate case it was open to the judge to ask an unrepresented criminal defendant whether there were matters he wished to have put to a witness.

«In a series of drug cases, U.S. District Judge William Young said the sentencing guidelines put too much power in the hands of prosecutors and give judges too little discretion in sentencing.&raquIn a series of drug cases, U.S. District Judge William Young said the sentencing guidelines put too much power in the hands of prosecutors and give judges too little discretion in sentencing.&raquin the hands of prosecutors and give judges too little discretion in sentencing.&raquin sentencing.»

Also, Courts Administrator Kevin McCormac said it remains in the discretion of the presiding judge whether the ruling on a particular case is put into the public domain.

If we assume the Crown's lawyer put in the Crown's best case, then there was nothing the trial judge said that the Crown lawyer (s) shouldn't have spotted as soon as the file showed up on the desk of the first lawyer who had the file.

The few situations in which a cost order might be put to you is if you have brought forward a case that is completely hopeless that has no chance of success whatsoever (often there might be a preliminary hearing in which it will be advised for you to drop the case by the judge but you push on regardless) or you behave badly in the way you have run your case / turned down a good settlement offer.

In these cases, which are not common, the parties and the judge usually put their decision on the record in case one of the parties tries to appeal later on the grounds that the judge should have recused herselIn these cases, which are not common, the parties and the judge usually put their decision on the record in case one of the parties tries to appeal later on the grounds that the judge should have recused herselin case one of the parties tries to appeal later on the grounds that the judge should have recused herself.

However, you have the right to take your case to trial and put the matter in the hands of a judge or jury.

«It's in some cases perfectly appropriate for a judge to rely on things we all know are true, but in this case the judge went too far,» he adds, citing the need for the trial judge to have at least put the issue to Ghaleenovee.

«Some of the judges threatened us with contempt: «Take these cases, or I'm going to put you in jail,»» Bunton says.

If a judge puts an entirely public profile on social media, it would seem there is no ethical rule precluding a lawyer from reading the public profile and utilizing information learned from it so long as the use of the information is in accordance with the ethical rules (i.e., you can't communicate ex parte with the judge about the subject of your case just because they posted on Facebook about a topic of mutual interest).

While false statements can be punished in some circumstances, in political contexts this is generally not the case (so that judges aren't put in the deciding the truth of a controversial question).

Similarly, this story from New York details a sentencing decision by US District Judge Richard J. Arcara which seemed to put the focus, in another a non-violent first - offense case, on rehabilitation concerns.

And in court, you put your family's future in the hands of a judge who often reviews your case only briefly before making lasting decisions for you and your family.

«Prenda Law, as Judge Otis Wright II put it in a case similar to this, was a «porno - trolling collective.»»

Ultimately, I believe judges should emulate Justice Knazan the next time they are faced with a case that centres around Twitter (or Facebook, snapchat, kik, WhatsApp, LinkedIn, tumblr, instagram, Tinder, etc...) and put it to the participants in the matter to explain how the platform works, why the evidence should be accepted and what relevance any of it has to the legal issue before the court.

However, succeeding in these cases is not as easy as putting all available evidence in front of a judge or jury.

The Howard League for Penal Reform and the Prisoners» Advice Service (PAS) charities have both been given permission by senior judges to put forward a new case that questions the legality of the budgetary restrictions that were brought in by the Ministry of Justice.

Although the additional time that the federal judges took to make decisions is not dispositive of the result, it adds to the possibility that state judges viewing the heavy burden on summary judgment were and are less willing to grant these motions as a threshold matter and instead prefer to let cases proceed to trial or settlement.112 By contrast, the federal judges who take more time in coming to decisions may put more weight on the summary judgment motions if they are, on the balance, more willing to grant them.

If the case needs to go before a judge, your legal team needs to have experience putting together all the data of the case and presenting it in an honest and convincing way.

La Haye said Lemieux not only preserved the integrity of the judicial system but also avoided putting herself in a conflict of interest if, for example, she ever had to judge an appeal in a drunk driving case.

But when he starts reeling off statistics like how a particular judge tends to rule in certain types of cases, «they lean forward, put their elbows on the table, and start asking questions,» he says.

«The case was put under seal to protect Judge Price's identity and where he lives, being that he's involved in felony sentencings,» Dunn said.