Sentences with phrase «judges ought»

Has the practice of asking similar questions that counsel ought to know are improper, and trial judges ought not to permit, stopped outside of Alberta?Apparently not in Ontario.

Judges ought to be well remunerated... (3.)

We did not have before us a claim that district judges ought to apply any kind of presumption in favor of a guidelines sentence, nor did we mean to endorse that idea.

That there are stricter guidelines for parents to pay up when needed; judges ought to enforce parents to pay the money that they owe their children, and that they can not get away with avoiding payment.

Sure, we argue about the details (e.g., me on prosecutors), but in general we know what defence lawyers, prosecutors and judges ought to do.

What lawyers and judges ought to do follows in significant part from the role they play.

Major changes in how disputes are resolved before judges ought to be supported by robust, independent research, so that we can be confident that we are striking the right balance between technical feasibility and what is right and in the interests of justice.

It is in that direction, and toward the coming in splendor of the Son of Man, that the eyes of the judges ought to be turned; for the redemption of the world is something more than any Messianic activity (Mark 14:61 f.).

The judge ought to have given this consideration more weight.

[49] In the absence of a reasonable explanation for the late disclosure, and without an adequate consideration of the issue of prejudice, the judge ought not to have permitted the use of the diary.

[119] Since the employment income that Ms. Brake earned during her statutory entitlement period is not deductible from the damages award, the trial judge ought to have determined her statutory entitlement period and identified which items of employment income were attributable to that period and which were attributable to the Balance of the... [more]

The deficiencies in the case that were obvious to the judge ought to have been obvious to the Crown long before the case got to trial.

Nobody on the ethics lists mentioned that the judge ought to have referred to Finnegans Wake rather than Ulysses?

Second, it raises the issue of whether or not a judge ought to decide, in advance of the hearing, and in the absence of oral submissions from counsel, whether or not oral evidence is necessary in a particular case.

There is no constitutional rule that says a judge ought to be restrained.

[50] The trial judge is to be commended for producing his reasons quickly but if more time would have meant a clearer fuller explanation, then the judge ought to have taken it.

[19] Having found that the losses all occurred in 2006, the trial judge ought to have combined the respondent's 2006 income with the past income loss award for the purpose of determining the income she would have earned for income tax purposes «as if she had continued working» (as per Tysoe J.A. at para. 185 of Lines).

As such, the Court of Appeal could not agree with the Appellants» argument that, in the circumstances of this case, the Trial Judge ought to have relaxed the causation test so as to permit a «common sense» analysis of the issue.

«A judge ought to be severe in awarding costs when he finds that expenses have been incurred through a wrongful suppression of material documents.»

The County argued that the Trial Judge ought to have considered the plaintiff's decision to try and ride the obstacle.

Ms. Punzo argued that Mr. Punzo was hiding income, and therefore the motion judge ought not to conclude that there had been a material change, no matter what the change in Mr. Punzo's salary might be.

Not exact matches

Although each member of the bench properly dons the black robe of the judge, the white robe of the prophet ought to rest uneasily upon his shoulders.

Let us all turn to sites like Acculturated, and if we're Catholic, let's join Mark Judge in holding that pop culture saavy ought to be one of the key criteria for choosing a pope, correct?

As she continues to read, we hear about Paul's incarceration and persecution, about how Jesus is «the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation,» about watching out for all those false teachings that circulated through the trade routes, about how we ought to stop judging each other over differences of opinion regarding religious festivals and food (I blush a little at this point and resolved to make peace with some rather opinionated friends before the next sacred meal), about how we should clothe ourselves with compassion, kindness, humility, gentleness, and patience, and love, about how we must forgive one another, about how the things that once separated Jew from Greek and slave from free are broken down at the foot of the cross, about how we should sing more hymns.

God loves us enough to send Jesus to die for us, but God will also judge and punish those who do not believe or behave as they ought.

God loves us enough to send Jesus to die for us, but God will also judge and punish those who don't believe or behavve as they ought.

Indeed, few people know any particular person well enough to judge the excellence of these quiet decisions, much less the whole pattern of someone's life, so those few of us who can affirm a person in these respects surely ought to do so.

I do remember clearly coming across a sixth - century homily which said that we ought to go easy on one another, and not judge one another, because God regards us so much more mercifully than we regard one another, and more mercifully than we regard ourselves.

If the meaning of our principle of historical aetiology, as opposed to an eye - witness report by someone who was himself present at the event, has been understood, we presumably also possess a criterion for judging what was correct in the description given by traditional theology of the blessed, supernatural, original condition of man, as opposed to what was a simplified projection into the past, into human beginnings, of the state of man as it ought to be and will be in the future.

However, a debate continues on whether judges «ought» to grab the religious balloon strings.

This perspective unmistakably reveals the unwholesomeness, not to put it more strongly, of our way of life: our obsession with sex, violence, and the pornography of «making it;» our addictive dependence on drugs, «entertainment,» and the evening news; our impatience with anything that limits our sovereign freedom of choice, especially with the constraints of marital and familial ties; our preference for «nonbinding commitments;» our third - rate educational system; our third - rate morality; our refusal to draw a distinction between right and wrong, lest we «impose» their morality on us; our reluctance to judge or be judged; our indifference to the needs of future generations, as evidence by our willingness to saddle them with a huge national debt, an overgrown arsenal of destruction, and a deteriorating environment; our unsated assumption, which underlies so much of the propaganda for unlimited abortion, that only those children born for success ought to be allowed to be born at all.

We have a right to judge them and to decide that they ought to change one way or another.

To this characteristic of the probable Aristotle links a trait that we have already encountered: rhetoric, he says, enables one to «persuade the opposition,» not that the orator ought to plead indifferently for or against, but if he undertakes to persuade the listeners or the judge of something, he must anticipate the argument of his adversary in order to refute it.

The founders of this very nation (56 out of 56) did that in the Declaration of Independence: «We, therefore, the Representatives of the united States of America, in General Congress, Assembled, APPEALING TO THE SUPREME JUDGE OF THE WORLD for the rectitude of our intentions, do, in the Name, and by Authority of the good People of these Colonies, solemnly publish and declare, That these United Colonies are, and of Right ought to be Free and Independent States

It was in fact the most vital, most inspiring religion in the whole world at that time; and if we are tempted to contrast it with Christianity, say with the religion of the gospel or with Christianity as it ought to be, let us add that Judaism is likewise to be judged by what it aimed to be, not by what it empirically was; and also, that Christianity owes a vast debt to Judaism - in fact, as we have already observed, the best in Judaism and the best in Christianity are not two religions but one, historically and essentially.

One ought not to forget this consideration when sometimes one judges a doubter severely for talking.

The perfect judge would have to apply an infinitely complex law, so that each person under the law would be held to a standard that is individually tailored to his situation: «Anyone who was born on May 23 at 2:53 p.m. at 1128 Main St. and whose first sight was of a quite pretty nurse named Amy whose hands were slightly cold...» and so on, telling the exact story of your life in literally every detail, ``... any such person ought to have been able to control his temper upon discovering that the morning newspaper was wet from the rain, but could not be expected to remember to buy a card for his sister's sixteenth birthday.»

It exists for the corporate worship of God, and ought to be judged solely by the degree to which it contributes to this end.

The fact that a congregation is a worshipping community means that a church service ought to be judged by canons other than those appropriate to other group gatherings.

Admittedly, one ought not judge a movement by its jokes, but neither should one be overly patient with those who delight in their own ignorance of elementary conceptual categories.

Yet modern Christians are always prone to judge the state and to tell it what it ought to do — thus tacitly admitting that the state is valid, legitimate, and a priori capable of using force justly.

But once more this claim can be made intelligible only if it can be shown that the whole gospel material is a theologein Christon: «Brethren, we ought so to think of Jesus Christ as of God, as of the Judge of quick and dead» (2 Clem.

The point is that we may judge according to it whether we ought to achieve a better consequence by breaking a promise, by asking whether we would regard it as desirable that regularly when the scales are balanced in a certain way all persons should break a promise of a certain solemnity in order to achieve an advantage of a certain magnitude.

Eliot was an artist, and a person's art should be judged by what a person was setting out to accomplish and not by what the reader thinks an allegedly Christian poem or poetry ought to «say» or be.

A teacher may determine whether the pupil makes progress or not, but he can not judge him; for he ought to have Socratic insight enough to perceive that he can not give him what is essential.

Our Lord's command not to judge the state of others» souls is subtly distorted into the frankly anti-Christian idea that we ought not to discriminate between right and wrong acts.

Perhaps we ought to realize that neither change nor stasis is the basis on which we must judge what the will of God is.

the individual himself is not the proper judge as to his possession of these qualifications, the church is the natural medium of the call, and its decision ought ordinarily to be accepted as final.

That and our «third - rate educational system, our third - rate morality, our refusal to draw a distinction between right and wrong lest we «impose» our morality on others and thus invite others to «impose» their morality onus, our reluctance to judge or be judged, our indifference to the needs of future generations as evidenced by our willingness to saddle them with a huge national debt, an overgrown arsenal of destruction, and a deteriorating environment; our inhospitable attitude to the newcomers born in our midst, our unstated assumption which underlies so much of the propaganda for unlimited abortion that only those children born for success ought to be allowed to be born at all.»

Even so, and for all their impressive defensive focus up 2 - 0, United still experienced the occasional lapses in concentration as the match went on that Liverpool have typically and ruthlessly capitalized on this season: referee Craig Pawson and the line judge both had poor views of Antonio Valencia's hand impeding a dangerous cross in what ought to have been a stonewall penalty call; on the other side of the defensive line, Young somehow managed to get away with hugging Salah from behind as the Egyptian attempted to control the ball in the box.