Sentences with phrase «judges used their judgment»

The problem arises when judges use their judgments to mock the parties» arguments.

The Court of Appeal judges used their judgment on two preliminary issues (in particular, whether Dr Singh could use the defence of «fair comment») to mount a robust and somewhat lyrical defence (quoting Milton, amongst other things) of the right to scientific freedom of expression.

Not exact matches

Part of the problem the way the question is posed is by assuming that we can abstract an ethical ideal from one part of scripture and use it to judge the actions of God in another part of scripture, as though scripture were given us so we could form such dehistoricized abstract ethical judgments!

If those around that person judge and condemn him or her for not having a day to day job, then they have failed the test that is used regarding the Sheep and Goat judgment.

After describing in some detail the principle of complementarity in physics, Austin suggests that images of God as Father and as Judge are complementary models used to interpret individual and corporate experience.24 The prophet Amos, he points out, interpreted events in Israel's history primarily in terms of God's judgment, while Hosea understood events in terms of God's forgiveness.

Used to justify all manner of errant nonsense, it is nevertheless «essentially prophetic, which is to say that its ideals and aspirations stand in constant judgment over the passing shenanigans of the people, reminding them of the standards by which their current practices and those of their nation are ever being judged and found wanting.

Using a phrase to designate the coming judgment — «on that day» — the text (7:22 f.) says that many Christian prophets, exorcists, and miracle workers will appear before the messianic judge.

The only novelty may come in breaking away from the clichés that have come to pervade our discussion of law and in recovering what judges used to understand as the axioms of reason that supplied the grounds of their judgments.

For with the judgment you pronounce you will be judged, and with the measure you use it will be measured to you.

Yet, not only is Chris Conlee judging his close friend, but he is using this friendship as a reason we are supposed to trust his judgment: «As one of my closest friends and partners in ministry, I can assure you that I have total confidence in the redemptive process Andy went through under his leadership in Texas.»

Conventional liberal criticism has deemed the «prayer» of Habakkuk to be a later, and unauthentic, addition, We prefer the judgment of those who read here the report of the promised vision, which, in its use of brilliant images, reminds us of Judges 5 and Deuteronomy 33.

It seems that when people state «don't judge me» they are not comfortable in their own use of judgments.

According to an order for declaratory judgment which was sent by Rosenblum to a New York state Supreme Court judge on Oct. 17, the mayor will seek to nullify a decision by the Democratic majority of Leon Potok, David Finch and Ilissa Miller on the village board to authorize a ballot referendum that — if passed by public vote on Election Day — would restrict Rosenblum's ability to appoint a village attorney as well as certain land use board members.

One after another, teachers used the words «meaningless» and «unfair» to describe the evaluations and the process used to arrive at those judgments... Another teacher said the majority of his autistic, special - needs students failed the SBA — a mandatory assessment test — yet he was judged «highly effective.

Teachers make value judgments about technologies presented to them, and the more valuable they judge a tool to be, the more likely they are to use it (Ertmer & Ottenbreit - Leftwich, 2010).

With use of standard wording, one has the ability to refer to past judgments to get clear interpretations of the text issued and reviewed by judges.

A U.S. judge issued a scathing decision on March 4 that found that American lawyer Stephen Donziger had used corrupt means to help villagers win the judgment against Chevron in Ecuador.

Before a summary judgment judge should use the expanded powers under Rule 20, they should first determine whether there is a genuine issue requiring trial based on the evidence which is already before them.

[5] In the months following the amendments to Rule 20, it has become a matter of some controversy and uncertainty as to whether it is appropriate for a motion judge to use the new powers conferred by the amended Rule 20 to decide an action on the basis of the evidence presented on a motion for summary judgment.

The Ontario Court of Appeal is set to deliver long - awaited guidance on judges» authority to use the summary judgment rule.

To maximize that benefit, CanLII, Canada's national support service for judgments, statutes, and regulations, should be enabled to provide at cost, the greater and more complete support services that LAO LAW provides, but provide them nationally, and in all areas of traditional practice, to all lawyers and judges who choose to use them.

The list of issues should be used by judges to actively promote a consideration of whether particular issues were appropriate for summary judgment or strike out applications.

Judge Reiss granted the defendants» motion for summary judgment, finding that «the only reasonable interpretation of that language is that it requires Killington Ltd. to provide the designated passholder free use of all ski lifts operated by Killington Ltd. at the Killington Ski Area so long as it operates in that area... «The term corporation, she wrote, «clearly refers to the named corporations, Sherburne and Killington Ltd.» and «reveals no intention to bind Killington Ltd's successors... To the contrary, Killington Ltd.'s obligations under the passes clearly terminate with its cessation of operations in the area.»

U.S. District Court Judge Robert Sweet issued a summary judgment ruling (pdf) that Myriad Genetics» patents on the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes were invalid, as were the patents on Myriad's tests using those genes.

The judgment is part of a matrimonial dispute, in which Mr. Meads attempted to use many of the various techniques and strategies adopted by what the judge called «Organized Pseudolegal Commercial Argument [«OPCA»] Litigants.»

At the summary judgment motion, the judge found that the legality of the present use of the residential apartments was a valid objection and the vendor did not establish that the residential apartments were a legal non-conforming use.

The Hryniak decision backed Ontario's new rules on summary judgment (judgment made on a claim, without full trial, when a judge finds an issue can be decided based on certain facts or clear, incontrovertible evidence), and provided guidance on when it can be used.

Lord Denning and Justice Watt are not the only judges to use literary styles to open their judgment.

Judge Zabel used extremely bad judgment in wearing that hat into the courtroom.

A judgment where the judge simply lists the cases he or she has referred to — and there are several of these — provides nothing that can be used to validate any of those cases or, of course, his or her own reasons for judgment.

Where a judgment is given in favour of the Government, the perception, however ill - deserved, may be that the judge has been co-opted through the use of CMP in a miscarriage of justice.

The judge found that the plaintiff was using legal judgment, and therefore, he was acting as a practicing lawyer.

Although he did not grant summary judgment, the Judge concluded that the case did not require a full Trial, and used the new summary judgment tools to tailor a «Summary Trial».

First, some states use a summary judgment standard that is less favorable to the moving party than that in federal court.92 Second, federal court judges handle cases from start to finish, whereas many state court cases are not assigned to individual judges until trial.

I tried to sue lawyers - they used summary judgment / vexatious to stop me - at all levels of court they never gave arguments so the judges had to fill in their defence / represent them and at every level there was NO analysis - to give analysis they had to give all the arguments / case law of the defence if they support their side - so no analysis = there was no defence and the case was fixed to protect the lawyers - an obstruct justice strategy.

The case was before the advent of the Civil Procedure Rules 1998 and the judge granted summary judgment under RSC Ord 14 and injunctions to prevent the use of the domain names by the defendants.

Even if judges used Multimarkdown to write judgments in plain text rather than Word, it would be a simple, consistent conversion process to HTML for CanLII and PDF, with professional typesetters (or even just CSS designers) worrying about double - spacing online or single - spacing in PDF, font choices, whitespace, etc..

Justice Brown encouraged Judges to use the tools given to them, namely the Rules of Civil Procedure and the inherent jurisdiction of the court, to drill down and question whether certain summary judgment motions are appropriate, given the nature and progress of the particular lawsuit.

If, in the court's opinion, scheduling the summary judgment motion would not be a prudent use of judicial resources, Judges should be prepared to refuse to schedule the motion.

In deciding if these powers should be used to weed out a claim as having no chance of success or be used to resolve all or part of an action, the motion judge must ask the following question: can the full appreciation of the evidence and issues that is required to make dispositive findings be achieved by way of summary judgment, or can this full appreciation only be achieved by way of a trial?

This is not at all beyond the powers of IT folks at the moment; and word processors can be customized, if need be, to enable machine readable judgments to be crafted by judges or their assistants with no more fuss than they now encounter using Word.

Very recently in the landmark judgment in Group Seven Ltd v Nasir [2016] EWHC 629 (Ch) the Chancery Division of the High Court, sitting with a full High Court Judge, used GHR in the costs budget of a claim for over # 9 million with a trial estimated to last 40 days.

These are particularly important in a contested divorce, as the judge may use these documents to form the basis of his judgment for a settlement.

For post judgment spousal support and modification of spousal support, the Court does not use the disso master program per California law and uses the Family Law Code 4320 factors which include earning capacity and income of each spouse, ability of spouse to pay support, need of a spouse for support, age and health of the spouses, any documented domestic violence and many other factors and the Judge has discretion in the amount.