Sentences with phrase «judging asylum cases»

Wiles» statement represents an apparent policy change as it contradicts the «Nationality - Swapping» document, which describes how Border Agency officials judging asylum cases should access DNA and isotope evidence from the project and use it in interviews with asylum seekers.

Not exact matches

Administrative closure of a case is typically granted when the judge decides the child seeking asylum might be eligible for some sort of immigration relief.

For officials they are institutions where irregular situation of foreigners residing or entering Poland is managed — they are kept under surveillance until their cases are resolved by deporting them, giving them asylum or releasing from the centre by the judge.

If a judge decided that there was no danger of a foreigner departing Poland without waiting for the resolution of the her / his case by the Office for Foreigners3, the asylum seeker could leave the centre.

«Court Urges Review of New York Judge's Immigration Cases That Are on Appeal»: The New York Times today contains an article that begins, «In a move that immigration lawyers say is highly unusual, a federal appeals court has recommended that a Justice Department appeals board review all immigration cases still on appeal involving a judge who has been criticized as being hostile to people seeking asJudge's Immigration Cases That Are on Appeal»: The New York Times today contains an article that begins, «In a move that immigration lawyers say is highly unusual, a federal appeals court has recommended that a Justice Department appeals board review all immigration cases still on appeal involving a judge who has been criticized as being hostile to people seeking asCases That Are on Appeal»: The New York Times today contains an article that begins, «In a move that immigration lawyers say is highly unusual, a federal appeals court has recommended that a Justice Department appeals board review all immigration cases still on appeal involving a judge who has been criticized as being hostile to people seeking ascases still on appeal involving a judge who has been criticized as being hostile to people seeking asjudge who has been criticized as being hostile to people seeking asylum.

Well, there exist various networks; formal networks, less formal networks, I believe there is a network for national judges in asylum cases; in administrative law there is an important network called ACA which is run officially by the Belgian Council of State; there is a network of competition law judges.

With their oral testimony often offered as the only evidence to support their claims, and with few Asylum Officers, only 35 Fraud Detection and National Security officers assigned to asylum offices throughout the country, and a mere 316 Immigration Judges already overwhelmed by a backlog of 542,411 cases, it should be no surprise that the credible fear process is uniquely susceptible to fraud.&Asylum Officers, only 35 Fraud Detection and National Security officers assigned to asylum offices throughout the country, and a mere 316 Immigration Judges already overwhelmed by a backlog of 542,411 cases, it should be no surprise that the credible fear process is uniquely susceptible to fraud.&asylum offices throughout the country, and a mere 316 Immigration Judges already overwhelmed by a backlog of 542,411 cases, it should be no surprise that the credible fear process is uniquely susceptible to fraud.»

The reduction in appeal rights which has largely ended the era by which most government decisions (outside of asylum and family migration cases) are subject to review by independent judges.

The supervisory immigration judges will be able to devote full - time to moving cases, resulting in an increase of about 50 percent in the number of immigration judges handling asylum claims, he said.

Given the fact that each judge could be assigned eight or more asylum cases (any one of which could have hundreds of pages of background evidence) each week, the ability for any given judge to have full familiarity with any given case is limited.

The clinic represents clients in family law cases in Boulder District Court, social security disability cases before federal administrative law judges, and asylum cases before immigration law judges.

A refusal by a senior immigration judge to order reconsideration of a case by a panel of the Asylum and Immigration Tribunal can therefore only be reviewed under the statutory review procedure by a High Court judge, whose decision on the review is final, and judicial review of the refusal to order reconsideration is not available.

These cases generally involve representation of an individual seeking asylum, including preparation of an application with a supporting brief and affidavits and a hearing before an INS administrative law judge.

(Quite apart from the decision - order effects the authors were studying, they also found that, in New York, some judges granted asylum in 80 % of cases, while others approved less than 10 %.