Yet
judging by its school system — perhaps the most important indicator of a country's future economic performance — this Swedish model's looks appear to be fading fast.
Not exact matches
«The teacher evaluation
system we have in place already, and it's actually negotiated according to each
school district,» Klein said, «but, again, I think it's difficult for them to be
judged by the standards of Common Core when Common Core wasn't implemented properly.»
A
judge has temporarily blocked the state from withholding approximately $ 250 million in
school aid from New York City as a penalty for the city's failure to reach agreement with the UFT on a new teacher evaluation
system by the Jan. 17 deadline.
The Kansas City, Mo.,
school district asked a federal
judge last week to void a vote
by the state board of education to strip the
system of its state accreditation.
Los Angeles County Superior Court
Judge Dzintra I. Janavs wrote in a 20 - page decision that the mayor's plan violates several provisions of the state constitution
by shifting, in part, «management and control of the 708,000 - student Los Angeles Unified
School District to entities and authorities... that are not part of the public school system.&
School District to entities and authorities... that are not part of the public
school system.&
school system.»
Kentucky must equalize spending among
school districts, revise its tax
system, and significantly boost its share of
school revenues if it is to fulfill its obligation to children under the state constitution, an advisory committee appointed
by a state trial
judge has concluded.
For some reason, even though we've known for decades that different
schools face different challenges, only a few states have embraced this insight
by creating
systems that
judge schools based on things they control.
A federal
judge overseeing a 26 - year - old
school desegregation case in Chicago has indicated that as long as some details are added, he is inclined to approve a proposed final settlement between the
school system and the U.S. Department of Justice that could end court supervision of the district
by July of next year.
Judge Kalokathis is expected to issue a final decision on the overall
school funding
system by Feb. 1.
We all fantasize about a world in which student learning growth on math and reading tests is calculated and used
by central authorities to
judge quality, but the reality is that very few
school systems actually rely heavily on value - added measures (VAM).
A federal
judge ruled last week that the Arlington County, Va.,
school system was violating the U.S. Constitution
by using racial preferences to admit students to its three magnet
schools.
The lawsuit is the first of what many analysts expect will be numerous legal challenges around the country following a landmark decision in June
by a California Superior Court
judge who struck down the tenure
system there as unconstitutional under state law, saying it unfairly saddled students in high - needs
schools with low - performing teachers.
Under NCLB,
schools are
judged largely on the basis of test scores, and many
schools have figured out that the
system can be gamed simply
by targeting groups of students with intensive test preparation.
Maricopa County Superior Court
Judge Rebecca A. Albrecht ruled that a new finance
system must be in place
by June 30, 1998, or the state must stop distributing state aid to
schools.
Ultimately it will be those visions, applications, the
judging of the applications, and, most importantly, the execution of the winning visions
by the
school districts themselves that have the potential to set the country on a path toward transforming the education
system into a student - centric one and bolstering the achievement of every child.
A new way to evaluate teachers, known as the Wisconsin Educator Effectiveness
System, begins this
school year across Wisconsin — giving equal weight to teachers» performance in the classroom as
judged by principals and student academic achievement.
In a statement, UTLA President Warren Fletcher said he was pleased that the
judge «acknowledged that the teacher evaluation
system for LAUSD must be collectively bargained and that the final product must be agreed on
by both the
school district and the teachers.»
Science is an integral part of the new
system by which
schools will be
judged this year, and alternative science qualifications, such as BTECs, do not count towards final results.
However, a district
judge threw out the case in 2006, ruling that because the
system complied with Amendment 23, which mandates that
school funding increase every year
by at least the rate of inflation, it was constitutional.
A vigorous dissent
by three judges, argued, «By erroneously affirming the district court's decision, we allow the State of California to perpetuate discrimination against qualified minority teachers, who are already seriously underrep - resented in the California public school system, and, derivatively, against minority students as well.&raqu
by three
judges, argued, «
By erroneously affirming the district court's decision, we allow the State of California to perpetuate discrimination against qualified minority teachers, who are already seriously underrep - resented in the California public school system, and, derivatively, against minority students as well.&raqu
By erroneously affirming the district court's decision, we allow the State of California to perpetuate discrimination against qualified minority teachers, who are already seriously underrep - resented in the California public
school system, and, derivatively, against minority students as well.»
The Justice Department is seeking to bar the awarding of these scholarships, also called vouchers, in public
school systems that are under federal desegregation orders, unless the vouchers first are approved
by a federal
judge.
All across Canada,
judges, law societies, courthouses,
schools, and professional bodies have been imploring the modernization of the court
system in order to improve the administration of justice — and
by extension, improve access to justice.
In an article on 18 February 2016, Maclean's called Canadian jails the «new residential
schools» because of «discriminatory practices and a biased
system» that «work against an Indigenous accused, from the moment a person is first identified
by police, to their appearance before a
judge, to their hearing before a parole board.»