Sentences with phrase «judging by the heights»

yes im short but do nt judge me by my height, judge me by my performence, and or personality.

I am sure that there are many females who don't mind towering over a date, but I am not one of them... and judging by the heights of some of the men that have viewed me, some of them obviously don't fancy dating a Nicole Kidman when they could have a Kylie.

Not exact matches

Mastro provided color in the otherwise dank room: with his legs still crossed and his spine touching the back of his chair, he gestured with his hands, elicited a smile from one judge by complimenting her question, repeatedly referenced his own past service as a deputy to Mayor Rudy Giuliani and said Ben - Amotz's arguments were «the height of hypocrisy.»

Blind from infancy due to retinal cancer, Daniel Kish learned as a young boy to judge his height while climbing trees by making rapid clicking noises and listening for their echoes off the ground.

After a warm - up, participants were asked to judge the height and width of the goal by adjusting a handheld, scaled - down model of the goal made out of PVC pipes.

Since it goes by height and not weight, you're being judged in proportion to your own physique.

If you are curious about numbers: about 81 percent of people misrepresent their height, weight or age in their profiles, according to a study led by Catalina L. Toma, an assistant professor in the department of communication arts at the University of Wisconsin - Madison who wanted to learn more about how people present themselves and how they judge misrepresentation.

Online dating can be brutally competitive because you're typically judged only by your presentation in the most shallow of ways: by how you look and your stats (e.g. height and weight).

Judging by the headlamps and the coupe body style, we're obviously gazing at a 2 Series, while the front bumper and the lowered ride height suggest we're dealing with a high - performance version of the small M.

Just as you'd expect, the new XC40 gets a raised ride height and the extra plastic bits for the rufty - tufty look, new bumpers, roof rails and, judging by the photo, a set of side steps too.

They are all judged by the same standard of perfection and are identical in every respect except height.

The appeal was also based on the argument that the judge should have had regard to the fact that there was no evidence that «a hypothetical child» who did meet the manufacturer's criteria would have been safe on a booster seat, and that it was not established that the discrepancy between the claimant's height and those dictated by the manual instruction made any material difference to her injuries.

The motion judge made several key findings of fact: (i) there was no evidence the appellant's fall was caused by any defect in or lack of repair affecting the premises or any hazardous conditions associated with the premises themselves; (ii) there was no dispute the appellant was performing the renovation work for valuable consideration; (iii) there was no basis for a contractual claim that the respondents had failed to furnish the appellant with safety equipment; (iv) there was no evidence the appellant was inexperienced in performing roofing work or working at heights; and (v) the evidence did not support a finding that the respondents were aware the appellant lacked the necessary experience to carry out the project.