Sentences with phrase «judging by the number of people»

not how many missions we can set up, or music programs, or youth programs, etc. and our «success» certainly can't be judged by the number of people who warm the pews each week.

Judging by the number of people you see playing Candy Crush or a similar game on your morning commute, mobiles aren't just tools; they're fun tools!

It used to be a well - kept secret but judging by the number of people on the beach we think the word may be out!

And judging by the number of people taking 10 years seriously, this is not an obvious conclusion.

Judging by the number of people I saw snagging one, it was a simple but popular item.

Not exact matches

Judging by some of the comments the Times has received on its Displaced project so far, a number of people were touched by the feature in a way they likely wouldn't have been by a traditional photo series in the printed newspaper.

satans aim was to stop the fulfillment of the seed that would crush satan underfoot.This hybrid between the angels and man created giants abominations in Gods eyes.They also were a threat to Gods people as can be seen by the giants in the land of caanan after the flood.If we agree on that then there is no way that Eve would have had intercourse with satan [false doctrine of the seed of satan -RCB- because the blood lines were still untainted by angelic beings or satan at the time of Noah maybe that is also why the genealogy of Christ is well presented with no surprises apart from Hagar and Ruth these two were gentiles that shows Gods mercy grace was always there to all nations he accepts people by faith not by race.Prior to the flood the mixing of the angels and man must have been widespread after the flood these beings were present but in limited numbers and God told his people to destroy them as they were abominations but they were a threat to Gods people.It would be interesting to hear what the rabbis had to say on this matter as i would think the stories would have been past down from generation to the next.Especially regarding the flood.God promised he would never flood the earth again but a time is coming when the earth will be judged not by flood but by fire Jesus is our ark and we are safe in him.brentnz

Judging by the number of psychological self - help books that populate drugstore and supermarket shelves, one would think that the greatest moral failure of our time is to be bound by another person's wishes and desires.

I have a feeling that it may be the favorite of many more people judging by the number of times it's been ordered at restaurants when I've been at the table (not just by me).

Don't forget, that is just tickets sold; judging by the actual number of people at the park, it appears attendance has been far lower.

Listen there are some facts people wont accept but its true.Listen i have said it here and i stand by my comments Ospina is not part of arsenal's futute he wont last long term because he is not good enough at the most important thing shot stopping.He is ok but will never be world class at that.What people do nt know is that Szcz and Ospina have already developed.Szcz shot stopping is up there with the best keepers but mistakes and some stupid exposing has not allowed him to grab the first choice.I do nt judge a player by one match i make sure i watch and analyze them.I cant see Ospina being arsenal number one for 5 years.He does not have what it takes.As Roma should have made Szcz deal permanent after all he is useless ai nt he?

In so many words it means a number of American judges do not represent the people they serve whether by race, ethnic background or gender.

(4) The independent panel shall report as approved for each judicial position all highly qualified persons who make application to the panel, provided that if the number of highly qualified applicants exceeds three times the number of existing vacancies to be filled in such position (determined as of the time the panel renders its report), the independent panel shall report as approved the most highly qualified applicants in a number equal to three times the number of vacancies to be filled in such position, provided further that if the number of highly qualified applicants is less than three times the number of vacancies to be filled in such position the independent panel shall report as approved the most highly qualified applicants in a number equal to not less than two times the number of such vacancies, provided further that the following categories of applicants who are eligible for reelection or reappointment shall be reported as approved if their performance during their term of office merits continuation in office, and no other applicants shall be reported as approved for their vacancies: (a) a judge or justice completing a full term of office seeking re-election to that office, or (b) an interim Supreme Court justice who has been appointed by the Governor to fill an existing vacancy no later than the previous June 1 after approval of the Governor's screening panel, who has been confirmed by the State Senate and has assumed office no later than the date the panel renders its report, and who otherwise would not be required to make application to the independent screening panel pursuant to the provisions of sub-paragraph (3).

«People aren't used to seeing weights under 100 pounds, and I think that's triggering for a lot of people,» says dietitian and educator Claudia T. Felty, PhD, RD.. In general, she says, we all need to take a deep breath and a big step back from being so quick to judge others by the numbers on their sPeople aren't used to seeing weights under 100 pounds, and I think that's triggering for a lot of people,» says dietitian and educator Claudia T. Felty, PhD, RD.. In general, she says, we all need to take a deep breath and a big step back from being so quick to judge others by the numbers on their speople,» says dietitian and educator Claudia T. Felty, PhD, RD.. In general, she says, we all need to take a deep breath and a big step back from being so quick to judge others by the numbers on their scales.

One of the things I was most amazed by during my Whole30 experience was the number of people who decided to judge or criticize my decision and quickly offer their opinion.

If you are curious about numbers: about 81 percent of people misrepresent their height, weight or age in their profiles, according to a study led by Catalina L. Toma, an assistant professor in the department of communication arts at the University of Wisconsin - Madison who wanted to learn more about how people present themselves and how they judge misrepresentation.

Usually dating among Muslims is considered to be something wrong and inappropriate, and what is more it is judged by a large number of people.

I do judge a book by it's cover and not only the stars, number of persons review etc..

If for any reason the judge who received the greatest number of membership votes is unable to accept or fulfill the assignment, the next highest person to receive membership votes shall be contacted by the host Regional Director and offered the assignment.

Dynasty Warriors, the name itself evokes excitement for a lot of people and judging by the number at the end (and yes this does not indicate the exact amount of DW games released as there are many, many more) it is a well established franchise by now, we get to try out the latest release in the series, Dynasty Warriors 8.

Judging by most of the comments we get, the number of people lucky enough to get the NES and SNES Classic is going to be very small.

But judging by the number of hits that crazy post still draws, the term itself seemed to somehow become a rallying cry - popping up wherever smart people were talking about game criticism, or the lack thereof (again, nothing to do with me - on August 18th game - story duality was the furthest thing from my mind... I was on a plane to Leipzig I think).

oit is with indignation that we are speaking othis document is not acceptable • Bolivia owe have learned about this document through the media, not through you onow we are given 60 minutes to accept something already agreed upon by other states owe are seeing actions in a dictatorial way othis is unacceptable and anti-democratic owe say to the people of the world: they shall judge upon it othe rights of our people are not being respected owe are not going to decide about so many lives in only 60 minutes othis is s group of a small number of countries oAPPLAUS • Cuba o4 hours ago Obama announced an agreement which is non-existant owe is behaving like an emperor owe have seen version being discussed by secretive groups in the last hours and days oCuba will not accept your draft declaration oat this conference, there is no consensus on this document oI associate my voice to Tuvalu, Venezuela, Bolivia othe target of 2 degrees is unacceptable o... • Costa Rica ofor the reasons that we have heard, this document can not be considered the work of the AWG - LCA and can not be considered by the COP othis can only be an INF doc, it's just for information oadditional question: in an earlier version, a CP.15 - decision, para. 1: there was a reference to a legally binding instrument to be adopted by the COP onow: we have a new version, but the reference to legally binding instrument disappeared • USA o [wants to speak, but point of order by Nicaragua] • Nicaragua othere is already a precedent where we have not been given the right to speech onow that you have mentioned we finally want to speak • Pres. [moving on] oUS does not appear on my list any more, so next one is Sudan • Sudan othere must be something horribly wrong here oI pushed the button when I saw Nicaragua raising their sign in order to support them • Nicaragua othis is a deterioration of the democratic system oand this happens at the most important conference of the UN for many years owe have draft decisions about how to carry forward the process ostates (lists names) have written a submission: • this has not followed the basic principles of the UN • inclusion • bottom up processes • democratic participation • equality of states oduring this consequence, many states expressed their position against such approaches othe only agreement we recognize is??

I gave the page and figure numbers as they appear in the text of the edition I possess, which, to judge by other people's references, is the same text (with the same numbers) as in all other editions.

At his blog Recording Industry vs. The People, Ray Beckerman, a lawyer who defends people sued by record companies for unlawful file sharing, has posted a fascinating transcript of a June 17, 2008, motion hearing in Boston before U.S. District Judge Nancy Gertner, who is presiding over a number of consolidated RIAA People, Ray Beckerman, a lawyer who defends people sued by record companies for unlawful file sharing, has posted a fascinating transcript of a June 17, 2008, motion hearing in Boston before U.S. District Judge Nancy Gertner, who is presiding over a number of consolidated RIAA people sued by record companies for unlawful file sharing, has posted a fascinating transcript of a June 17, 2008, motion hearing in Boston before U.S. District Judge Nancy Gertner, who is presiding over a number of consolidated RIAA cases.

Otherwise the Supreme Court is telling 17 million British people that the whole thing was a waste of time and that the largest number of votes ever recorded on any issue in the history of the British Isles was in fact a bad joke played by the «liberal elite» on a public judged by them to be to dumb to know their own best interests!

This differs from a criminal case where the state or local prosecutor files the lawsuit, and a guilty person or party is punished with jail time, fines, probation, or a number of other penalties that can be handed down by a judge.

Both solutions will occur because the power of the news media and of the internet, interacting, will quickly make widely known these types of information, the cumulative effect of which will force governments and the courts to act: (1) the situations of the thousands of people whose lives have been ruined because they could not obtain the help of a lawyer; (2) the statistics as to the increasing percentages of litigants who are unrepresented and clogging the courts, causing judges to provide more public warnings; (3) the large fees that some lawyers charge; (4) increasing numbers of people being denied Legal Aid and court - appointed lawyers; (5) the many years that law societies have been unsuccessful in coping with this problem which continues to grow worse; (6) people prosecuted for «the unauthorized practice of law» because they tried to help others desperately in need of a lawyer whom they couldn't afford to hire; (7) that there is no truly effective advertising creating competition among law firms that could cause them to lower their fees; (8) that law societies are too comfortably protected by their monopoly over the provision of legal services, which is why they might block the expansion of the paralegal profession, and haven't effectively innovated with electronic technology and new infrastructure so as to be able to solve this problem; (9) that when members of the public access the law society website they don't see any reference to the problem that can assure them that something effective is being done and, (10) in order for the rule of law, the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, and the whole of Canada's constitution be able to operate effectively and command sufficient respect, the majority of the population must be able to obtain a lawyer at reasonable cost.

The trial judge in Carter found that an absolute prohibition on assisted suicide promotes a small number of wrongful deaths of vulnerable persons by compelling people to end their lives sooner than necessary to do if they were able to receive assistance and found that an exception to the prohibition would likely to reduce the number of wrongful deaths.

Zuckerberg says the company will begin to judge itself by «The number of interactions that people have on the platform and off the platform that people report to us as meaningful.»

The Full Federal Court found that the first judge had made a number of errors in his decision and have sent the case back for consideration by a new judge, leaving the Noongar peoples uncertain about the future of their rights over the land.