So the first guideline in
judging others correctly is to not be self - righteous.
Not exact matches
In
other words, even when we
correctly judge the risks - the saber - toothed tiger has gone for the day - we may misjudge the rewards - «What, you call * that * an antelope?
Just as
Judge Boswell
correctly demanded a court cite for the ADA's assertion that Wilson did have the «right» to pro se, she should have made the demand of Wilson if for no
other reason than a test of Wilson's ability to handle a trial.
For example, in R v Rogers [1995] 1 Cr App R 374, the exception was accepted to be applicable in principle in a criminal trial for possession of heroin, but the Court of Appeal found that the trial
judge correctly excluded evidence that a deceased person had admitted that the heroin belonged to him and
other people were «after him for the money for the heroin.»