Instead of
judging schools based on a snapshot of a single year's test scores, we compared results during a four - year period, looking for trends in student achievement.
Do Republicans really want to scrap the transparency that comes from measuring student (and school and district) progress from year to year and go back to the Stone Age of
judging schools based on a snapshot in time?
And annual tests help level the playing field between schools, enabling policymakers to
judge schools based on how well they serve their students, rather than the type of students they serve.
For some reason, even though we've known for decades that different schools face different challenges, only a few states have embraced this insight by creating systems that
judge schools based on things they control.
Accountability based on grade - span testing
judges schools based on the students they serve, not how well they serve them.
You don't want to
judge schools based on the students they serve, but how well the schools serve them.»
Not exact matches
Business analysts (who were young and fresh out of
school, remember) were
judged based on the percentage of their products that were in stock at any given time, and a low percentage would result in a phone call from a vice-president demanding an explanation.
The full 16 -
judge panel from the New Orleans -
based court last September concluded while the constitutional rights of the students were violated,
school administrators could not be sued under the «qualified immunity» legal standard.
-- Entrants will be
judged in the appropriate category
based on their
school year group on the time of entry.
(Because we're
judging this on a percentage
basis, the numbers only include
schools that had at least 12 first - round picks since 1990.
My feeling about milk in
schools, as shared by many TLT readers (
judging from this morning's discussion on the Facebook page and in comments on the blog), is that milk does have a place on lunch trays, but not to the exclusion of other beverages like water (which, as it turns out, is not so easy to get into cafeterias) and plant -
based milks for those who drink them.
The others include Albany -
based Appellate Justice Leslie Stein, a former City Court
judge; Buffalo -
based Appellate Justice Eugene Fahey; Daniel Alter, general counsel for the state Department of Financial Services; attorney Maria Vullo of Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison in Manhattan; attorney Rowan Wilson of Cravath, Swaine & Moore in Manhattan; and Preeta Bansal, a Manhattan -
based former state solicitor general who is a visiting scholar at Harvard Law
School and senior legal and policy advisor at the MIT Media Lab.
While unions have said they worry that teachers could be unfairly
judged based on their students» test results, the scoring for students and teachers is quite different — students get an objective standardized test score, while teachers are evaluated under multipart programs that are developed by local teachers unions and
school leaders.
The study was conducted by researchers at Cambridge
Judge Business
School and the Psychology Department of Cambridge University in collaboration with a UK -
based multinational bank.
This year's league tables also represent the last time that
schools will be
judged on the
basis of raw GCSE results.
In place of a
school report that
judges and reports student performance two or three times each year, this information might be provided on a more ongoing
basis — perhaps with the assistance of technology — and form the
basis of two - way (or three - way) conversations about student progress.
And so that officials can
judge school quality, some reformers favor requiring participating private
schools to take the state test
based on the state curriculum.
Those who are already skeptical about using tests to
judge schools and educators will find a lot to like, while those in favor of the practice will be challenged by the evidence presented that test -
based accountability can lead
schools to engage in unproductive practices.
Knowing the rules going in — e.g., that you will be
judged on performance (yours and your students) and that you could lose your job — makes it much easier to establish a collaborative and
school -
based incentive system.
Transparency can be painful, but it's necessary in an era of results -
based accountability for
schools, an era when we look to see how well a
school's pupils are learning and no longer settle for
judging schools by their inputs, intentions, or reputation.
His or her results would be the
basis on which their entire
school was
judged.
Yes, not all that long ago AFT advocated for an ESEA that «
judges school effectiveness — the only valid and fair
basis for accountability — by measuring the progress that
schools achieve with the same students over time.»
Many state accountability plans
judge schools on the
basis of these tests alone, and some states and
school districts are considering tying teachers» compensation to student test results.
But, if states and
school districts continue to insist on using state standards and tests to
judge school performance, then the for - profits will be pushed to compete for contracts and clientele on the
basis of a narrower set of criteria.
Try after try, the group failed to draft a system that would ensure that districts and
schools wouldn't return to
judging schools principally or totally on the
basis of aggregated results.
Choose which holes to construct
based on a class or
school vote, or ask participating partners to
judge the best holes.
Outside of
school, policy makers and the media are no longer heard
judging programs,
schools,
school districts, or states solely on the
basis of test scores.
iNACOL, the K — 12 international online learning association, has already done much of the work of creating the dashboard of outcomes -
based metrics on which full - time virtual charter
schools should be
judged.
Some are
based in
schools and operated by teachers or counselors; others are court -
based, administered by
judges, social workers or other court staff; yet others are community -
based, and organized by local non-profits.
When she announced her intention to overhaul the
school report cards last year, Fariña promised «the first balanced picture of a
school's quality,» one that «reflects our promise to stop
judging students and
schools based on a single, summative grade.»
Judge James Danikolas enjoined the nonprofit N.C.A., which institutions belong to on a voluntary
basis, from taking action to formally classify the district's
schools as having been warned of possible accreditation loss.
If we are going to
judge schools it should be
based on their record of improving outcomes for students.
Let's say we want to evaluate preschools on whether their students make progress on cognitive assessments, or
judge elementary
schools based on student - level gains during grades K — 3.
As the RAND study of charter
schools and vouchers, Rhetoric Versus Reality, argued, «
Judging the long - term effectiveness of the charter
school movement
based on outcomes of infant
schools in their first two years of operation may be unfair, or at least premature.»
While conventional wisdom, at least in some circles, holds that people
judge schools on the
basis of something other than academic quality — most odiously, the racial mix of their student body — here we have reassuring evidence that people evaluate
schools on the
basis of academics.
According to [former MCPS parent] John Hoven, «Superintendent Weast terminated the long - standing Montgomery County Public
Schools (MCPS) math testing program that could have provided a
basis to
judge his success or failure against his predecessors.»
Staff at Totley Primary
School,
based on the outskirts of Sheffield, were devastated in 2007 to be
judged inadequate and put into Special Measures.
Here's an example of how NCTQ mis - reads the research: Standard 13 is «Equity» and
judges teacher prep programs
based on whether «The program ensures that teacher candidates experience
schools that are successful in serving students who have been traditionally underserved.»
While some states still
judge schools solely
based on standardized test scores, these polls reveal that most parents and guardians do not.
As a result of our findings of no consistent statistical association between the achievement and attainment effects in
school choice studies we urged commentators and policymakers «to be more humble» in
judging school choice programs or
schools of choice
based solely or primarily on initial test score effects.
The Berlin -
based Grüntuch Ernst Architekten architecture firm that designed it was praised by the
judges for both the design and the environmental performance of the
school.
Due to this general disconnect between achievement and attainment effects of choice programs and, in a few cases in our sample, individual choice
schools, we caution commentators and regulators to be more humble and circumspect in
judging school choice programs and
schools of choice
based solely on their test score effects.
Linda Darling - Hammond, a highly respected professor at the Stanford Graduate
School of Education, testified during the Vergara trial that a teacher's performance should not be
judged on the
basis of flawed test rankings.
Diversity dance stars Jordan and Perri
judged the competition, with the winning
schools chosen
based on the creativity of their routines and the amount of energy they produced.
So we should be careful
judging school performance
based on later
school attainment, rather than income (or other measures).
We
judge our
schools and increasingly individual teachers
based on their ability to improve the reading skills of our children.
A recent poll conducted by the Leadership Conference Fund, a nonprofit civil rights group
based in Washington, D.C., found that 86 percent of Latino families said their child's report card topped the list in
judging school quality.
Under NCLB,
schools are
judged largely on the
basis of test scores, and many
schools have figured out that the system can be gamed simply by targeting groups of students with intensive test preparation.
It's further true that to
judge a
school simply on the
basis of how many of its pupils clear a fixed «proficiency» bar, or because its «performance index» (in Ohio terms) gets above a certain level, not only fails to signal whether that
school is adding value to its students but also neglects whatever is or isn't being learned by (or taught to) the high achievers who had already cleared that bar when they arrived in
school.
While interest in
judging school performance
based on the gains individual students make over time is high, the best way to do so is not even part of the current debate, one veteran testing expert argues.