Sentences with phrase «judgment against plaintiff»

The court below, the Circuit Court of the United States for Missouri, in which this suit was afterwards brought, followed the decision of the State court, and rendered a like judgment against the plaintiff.

We proved that the batteries were not defective and obtained a judgment against plaintiff on all claims and in favor of amounts owed to our client.

2 Dec. 12, 2016)(unpublished), a defendant corporation successfully obtained summary judgment against plaintiff and then moved to recover $ 133,644.50 in attorney's fees and costs from losing plaintiff.

Albers v. Woolworth Canada Inc., 1999 CarswellAlta 856 Acting for the plaintiff in this action for damages for personal injury sustained in a fall on the sidewalk adjacent to the defendants» property, I was successful in having an application for summary judgment against the plaintiff dismissed.

We also filed a motion for summary judgment against plaintiffs, which was heard by the court on the «eve» of trial.

Not exact matches

O'Leary himself is named as a «mise en cause,» someone who is not the main defendant but could be included if the plaintiff believes it may be necessary down the line to invoke a judgment against that person.

As the plaintiff in the case, I continue to have a constitutional duty to ensure that my judgment is executed against Woyome and all beneficiaries of the loot, and if that is interpreted as my being on the payroll of the NPP, so be it,» Mr Amidu noted.

As the plaintiff in the case, I continue to have a constitutional duty to ensure that my judgment is executed against Woyome and all beneficiaries of the loot, and if that is interpreted as my being on the payroll of the NPP, so be it.

Realizing that as a Party, my lawyers will apply to have the judgment set aside, Lawyers for plaintiffs, quickly discontinued the case against the Party.

The allegations by Kent and the others center on what the plaintiffs claim was an unfair attack on them by Spence and his allies regarding charges that a Rockland County council leader, Stephanie Lee, had misused a PEF bank card, making numerous personal purchases, which led to a court judgment of $ 64,104.88 against her.

Appeal from judgment entered by the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Mark D. Fox, Magistrate Judge), which held that defendant Board of Education of the Newburgh Enlarged City School District intentionally discriminated against plaintiff Santina Polera in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq., and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act, 29 U.S.C. § 794, and awarded damages to plaintiff.

If you were served with a complaint but ignored it or failed to appear in court, the judge will most likely enter a default judgment against you in favor of the plaintiff and the plaintiff wins by default.

«If a judgment is filed against the plaintiff then it would appear in that consumer's report.»

Plaintiff hereby consents to a judgment against him and in favor of the United States Department of Education in the amount of $ 4,800.00 as of December 3, 2012, This consent judgment is subject the terms set forth below.

A judgment is a legal term used when a plaintiff files and wins a civil lawsuit against a defendant.

On Oct. 5, 2015, Superior Court Judge Raymond M. Cadei in Sacramento, Calif., entered the stipulated judgment against Bluford in favor of the married plaintiffs who turned to Bluford and another company of his, California Legal Pros, for help evicting a tenant from a home they owned in Discovery Bay, Calif., only to be defrauded out of more than half a million dollars.

But that certainly wasn't the case in the Chevron suit, where a U.S. judge upheld a racketeering case against the plaintiffs» lawyer, stating the Ecuador judgment was obtained by corrupt means.

On appeal, the plaintiffs» requested that the judgment dismissing the action against Mr. Vicentini and Ford Credit be set aside and liability be apportioned equally between those two defendants and Mr. Hoang and requested that the amount of damages be increased.

In the coverage action, the plaintiffs were successful in obtaining summary judgment against the defendant insurer requiring the payment of damages, costs and interest in the underlying action.

Obtained judgment for plaintiff on Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act claims against HVAC company for misrepresentations concerning company's goods and services

Mercury has been served as a purported UM carrier and Plaintiff is seeking to hold Mercury liable to satisfy all or a portion of any judgment which might be rendered against Defendant in this matter.

Because neither party obtained a monetary recovery, the claims against trustee were not dismissed, and plaintiff obtained an equitable judgment against trustee, the case — with respect to routine costs — fell within the catch - all provision of CCP § 1032 (a)(4) which allows the trial court discretion to determine the prevailing party by comparing the relief sought with that obtained, along with the parties» litigation objectives.

Plaintiff claims to have suffered injuries in said accident and seeks to recover a judgment against Defendant for the same.

The insurer denied coverage to Mr. Hoang, and the plaintiffs were forced to bring an action for coverage, under section 258 (1) of the Insurance Act directly against the defendant insurer to have the insurance money payable under Mr. Hoang's motor vehicle policy applied toward satisfaction of the judgment.

Settling (while class certification and summary judgment motions were pending) a statewide putative class action filed in San Mateo Superior Court for nuisance value with the named plaintiffs who alleged multiple wage and hour claims (unpaid regular and overtime wages, noncompliant meal and rest periods, untimely payment of final wages, noncompliant itemized wage statements, unpaid / forfeited vacation, and violation of PAGA) against a pharmaceutical supply company's call center;

On September 25, 2009 I released my Reasons for judgment wherein I granted the plaintiff judgment against the defendants in the amount of approximately $ 11.1 million dollars.

«The plaintiffs seem to suggest that where five separate motions for summary judgment are brought against it, an unsuccessful plaintiff should not be responsible for more than one - fifth of its own substantial indemnity costs to any one successful party,» Brown wrote.

The judgment is among the largest ever issued against a foreign nation under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act, according to a press release by Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll, which represented the plaintiffs with co-counsel Karsman McKenzie & Hart.

The Court of Appeal dismissed the unrepresented plaintiff's appeal from Justice Perell's judgment, which summarily dismissed the plaintiff's action against lawyer D. Walcott retained lawyer D to collect a $ 248,000 unsecured loan.

I recently posted a blog about New York's top Court's recent ruling that New York personal injury plaintiffs can win «summary judgment» against...

He tried a suit against Fayette County Long Term Care which resulted in a $ 1.5 million judgment for the plaintiff.

«I am not prepared to adopt, as the defendant's argue, a blanket principle that an Ontario court lacks jurisdiction to entertain a common law action to recognize and enforce a foreign judgment against an out - of - jurisdiction judgment debtor in the absence of a showing that the defendant has some real and substantial connection to Ontario or currently possesses assets in Ontario... No jurisprudence binding on me has expressly placed a gloss on that ability to assume jurisdiction by requiring the plaintiff to demonstrate that the non-resident judgment debtor defendant otherwise has a real and substantial connection with Ontario.»

In California, the plaintiff in a bad faith action may be able to recover some of its attorneys» fees separately and in addition to the judgment for damages against a defendant insurer.

In Appeals Court, defeated appeal from the Superior Court's allowance of our motion for judgment on the pleadings on plaintiff's malpractice claims against our attorney client

Won summary judgment defending a Bankruptcy Trustee against claims amounting to over $ 1 million brought by a non-party plaintiff

An award of damages; the receiving of a favorable judgment; the winning of a lawsuit; a decree of a court granting the plaintiff part or all of his claim or claims against a defendant.

Except in cases affecting the personal status of the plaintiff, and cases in which that mode of service may be considered to have been assented to in advance, as hereinafter mentioned, the substituted service of process by publication, allowed by the law of Oregon and by similar laws in other States, where actions are brought against non-residents, is effectual only where, in connection with process against the person for commencing the action, property in the State is brought under the control of the court, and subjected to its disposition by process adapted to that purpose, or where the judgment is sought as a means of reaching such property or affecting some interest therein; in other words, where the action is in the nature of a proceeding in rem.

Drafted motion for summary judgment on behalf of component part manufacturer in a products liability case that resulted in voluntary dismissal of the plaintiff's claims against the manufacturer.

Drafted motion for summary judgment on behalf of a product manufacturer involving the economic loss doctrine and statute of limitations issues that resulted in voluntary dismissal of the plaintiff's claims against the manufacturer.

Won summary judgment dismissing a Texas Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act suit filed against a Texas - based, public accounting and advisory services company in which the plaintiff alleged our client was the wrongful recipient of over $ 1.8 million worth of client information and company goodwill.

Drafted motion for summary judgment on behalf of grocery store that resulted in voluntary dismissal of the plaintiff's claims against the store.

While it is true that the Allstate suit contains fraud allegations, Exclusion F only bars coverage for fraudulent acts if a final judgment or adjudication is entered against Plaintiffs.

Drafted motion for summary judgment for manufacturer in asbestos litigation that resulted in voluntary dismissal of the plaintiffs» claims against the manufacturer.

After years - long discovery in a defense of a False Claims Act action brought against a large healthcare company, including personally taking and defending more than twenty depositions of fact and expert witnesses, successfully excluded testimony of plaintiff / relator's experts and obtained complete summary judgment on all False Claims Act claims.

To the extent the credit report disclosed the existence of formal collection proceedings pursued by third parties against the plaintiffs, and / or judgments obtained by third parties against the plaintiffs, these were a matter of public record.

In Ferrara v. Lorenzetti, Wolfe6, the majority judgment of the Court of Appeal (Laskin and Sharpe, J.J.A.) held the plaintiff's claim against the defendant solicitor was NOT statute barred.

In 2008, another federal court harshly dismissed his claims for violations of the Fair Credit Reporting Act against two other creditors, noting that Flury had «filed eleven lawsuits against various defendants over the last four years, and with the exception of one case that ended in a default judgment, plaintiff has voluntarily dismissed every action once the defendant moved to dismiss the case or otherwise responded to the complaint.»

This 1992 case has definitely walked down it, but at the ned of the day, the plaintiffs and their counsel were singing the Pink Floyd anthem «Another Brick in the Wall» after consistently banging their collective heads against a popular procedural wall — Northern District of Illinois Local Rule 12 governing the briefing and submission of summary judgment motions.

Notable mandates: Represented physicians involved in providing care to Ashley Smith during the 2013 coroner's inquest; acted for Ontario Premier Kathleen Wynne in a defamation action against Ontario Progressive Conservative party leader Tim Hudak and energy critic Lisa MacLeod; in Wise v. Iran, acted for a Canadian victim of a suicide bombing (executed by individuals who received material support from Iran) who sought leave to intervene in ongoing proceedings commenced by United States plaintiffs in the Ontario Superior Court of Justice seeking orders recognizing the enforceability in Ontario of judgments they obtained from a U.S. court against Iran totaling about $ 370 million; in Khadr v. Edmonton Institution, acted as lead counsel for an intervener, the Canadian Civil Liberties Association, to argue that in interpreting Omar Khadr's sentence for the purpose of enforcing it in Canada, Correctional Services Canada was obliged to consider Khadr's right to liberty and principles of fundamental justice; acted for a physician in a malpractice claim in Moore v. Getahun, a precedent - setting case about restrictions on communication between counsel and experts in preparation of expert reports.

On behalf of an Indian Tribe client, Mr. McConnell successfully moved for summary judgment as a plaintiff against a contractor who was improperly licensed for over $ 900,000 in one action, and over $ 2,000,000 in another.