You want to have
a judgment against the insurance company too in case the contractor can not or does not pay you.
Not exact matches
To the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, you agree to indemnify, defend and hold harmless Daily Harvest, and our respective past, present and future employees, officers, directors, contractors, consultants, equityholders, suppliers, vendors, service providers, parent companies, subsidiaries, affiliates, agents, representatives, predecessors, successors and assigns (individually and collectively, the «Daily Harvest Parties»), from and
against all actual or alleged Daily Harvest Party or third party claims, damages, awards,
judgments, losses, liabilities, obligations, penalties, interest, fees, expenses (including, without limitation, attorneys» fees and expenses) and costs (including, without limitation, court costs, costs of settlement and costs of pursuing indemnification and
insurance), of every kind and nature whatsoever, whether known or unknown, foreseen or unforeseen, matured or unmatured, or suspected or unsuspected, in law or equity, whether in tort, contract or otherwise (collectively, «Claims»), including, but not limited to, damages to property or personal injury, that are caused by, arise out of or are related to (a) your use or misuse of the Sites, Content or Products, (b) any User Content you create, post, share or store on or through the Sites or our pages or feeds on third party social media platforms, (c) any Feedback you provide, (d) your violation of these Terms, (e) your violation of the rights of another, and (f) any third party's use or misuse of the Sites or Products provided to you.
Granted, the reason for compulsory liability
insurance is protection of others
against judgment - proof tortfeasors, but one could also say that old - age
insurance protects society
against dependent old people.
They can also cover prepaid taxes and
insurance; debts that have to be paid at closing; and liens or
judgments against the borrower.
Umbrella and excess liability policies provide the additional protection you need in case a
judgment against you exceeds the liability limits of your existing auto, home, or other
insurance policies.
If a
judgment against you exceeds the liability limits of an underlying policy, such as auto or homeowners
insurance, a personal umbrella policy may help provide an additional layer of coverage.
In 2005 the company won a lawsuit
against National Union Fire
Insurance relating to its director's and officers» insurance policy and was awarded a $ 32.1 million judgment by the US Distri
Insurance relating to its director's and officers»
insurance policy and was awarded a $ 32.1 million judgment by the US Distri
insurance policy and was awarded a $ 32.1 million
judgment by the US District Court.
We routinely file suits and collect
judgments against perpetrators of
insurance fraud including both insureds and medical providers.
In conjunction with the right to control the defense, an
insurance company has «the duty not to gamble with the insured's money by foregoing reasonable opportunities to settle a claim on terms that will protect the insured
against an excess
judgment.»
Our team of
insurance coverage attorneys has advised individuals and businesses about
insurance coverage issues including
insurance policy coverage opinions, declaratory
judgments on policy coverage and defense of insurers
against breach of contract and bad faith claims.
The insurer denied coverage to Mr. Hoang, and the plaintiffs were forced to bring an action for coverage, under section 258 (1) of the
Insurance Act directly against the defendant insurer to have the insurance money payable under Mr. Hoang's motor vehicle policy applied toward satisfaction of the
Insurance Act directly
against the defendant insurer to have the
insurance money payable under Mr. Hoang's motor vehicle policy applied toward satisfaction of the
insurance money payable under Mr. Hoang's motor vehicle policy applied toward satisfaction of the
judgment.
This
judgment led to a period of uncertainty with
insurance companies arguing in numerous cases that similar payments should be set off
against the claims for damages.
On October 1, 2010, Ontario Superior Court Justice J. N. Morissette granted a $ 455.7 million
judgment in Jeffrey and Rudd v. London Life, a complex class action brought
against two
insurance companies regarding their use of surplus earnings held in an account for the benefit of holders of London Life
insurance policies (the «PAR Account»).
Typically, the tort victim agrees not to pursue the insured / tortfeasor's personal assets and to limit recovery to
insurance proceeds and equitable garnishment claims
against the
insurance company after a
judgment is entered.
In the course of proceedings before the tribunal between the commissioners and the taxpayer company, X, in relation to X's liability under a county court
judgment for unpaid PAYE income tax and national
insurance contributions, the tribunal awarded costs in the sum of # 30,500,
against the commissioners because of their «serial failures to comply with the time limits in the tribunal, rules and directions».
The SEF 44 endorsement for excess
insurance, sometimes called Special or Family Protection Endorsements, indemnifies insureds for any shortfall in payment of a
judgment for damages
against an underinsured tortfeasor, subject to the deductions set out in the endorsement itself.
Obtained a $ 2MM
judgment against large, international
insurance stemming from improper denial of UIM claim involving wrongful death victim.
One important goal of your lawyer is to keep a
judgment against you that exceeds the amount of
insurance you have.
Yesterday's
judgment by the Court of Appeal in Coulson v News Group Newspapers (NGN) is good news for those who have a legal expenses
insurance policy which they wish to use to defend themselves
against an allegation that they have committed a criminal offence.
Plaintiffs allege that State Farm Mutual Automobile
Insurance Company conspired with Illinois Supreme Court Justice Lloyd Karmeier's campaign to elect Karmeier to the Supreme Court, with State Farm providing campaign funding in exchange for Karmeier's vote to overturn the
judgment against them.
While this blog is primarily concerned about ICBC injury claims
against at - fault drivers (tort claims) written reasons for
judgment were released today that are of interest to anyone caught up in a dispute with ICBC with respect to their own
insurance coverage and the value of damage to their car.
For example, when a driver is at fault in a vehicle accident and is sued and loses, their
insurance company is required to pay the amount of the
judgment against them.
2nd Chair and put up witness during arbitration in which former employee sought $ 10 million in damages
against nationwide provider of
insurance and investment products and services and obtained complete
judgment for defense;
(1) Starlight Shipping Co v Allianz Marine & Ors; Brit UW Ltd & Ors v Starlight & Ors; Brit UW & Ors v Imperial Marine & Ors [2011] EWHC 3381 (Comm); [2012] 2 All E.R. (Comm) 608; [2012] 1 Lloyd's Rep. 162; [2012] 1 C.L.C. 100 — summary
judgment on claims by insurers
against assured for breach of a settlement agreement and of jurisdiction agreements in the settlement and in the underlying policy of
insurance — constitution of a fund from which to indemnify insurers
against future loss and damage resulting from continuation of the foreign proceedings where no anti suit injunction could be granted due to Turner v Grovit and Front Comor — refusal of discretionary stay in favour of Greek court under Article 28 where stay would condone breach of contract.
In summary, so long as you have ICBC
insurance coverage, in most situations ICBC will take care of defending any lawsuit
against you and paying out any
judgment up to the maximum of the policy limit.
The Pennsylvania Superior Court reversed the ruling of the trial court and awarded a
judgment notwithstanding the verdict, vacating a large verdict
against Kim's client, a mutual
insurance company, on the basis that the insurer's conduct in handling a fire damage claim did not constitute bad faith as a matter of law.
Drivers purchase
insurance to protect themselves
against the threat of being involved in a car accident
against an insured driver who is really without assets to satisfy and sort of
judgment.
(4) Starlight Shipping Co v Allianz Marine & Ors; Brit UW Ltd & Ors v Starlight & Ors; Brit UW & Ors v Imperial Marine & Ors [2014] EWHC 3068 (Comm); [2015] 2 All E.R. (Comm) 747; [2014] 2 Lloyd's Rep. 579; [2014] 2 C.L.C. 503; [2015] Lloyd's Rep. I.R. 54 — relief granted to both insurers and employees and agents of the insurers who were intended to benefit from the settlement of the
insurance claim - relief by way of specific performance and injunctions was tailored to the particular circumstances which included the prohibition on anti-suit injunction to restrain the Greek proceedings — assured ordered to execute documents recording the meaning and effect of the settlement agreement (including settlement of claims
against the servants and agents who were third parties to the original settlement) so that the same could be placed before the foreign court to assist in the recognition and enforcement of the English
judgment in Greece under the
Judgments Regulation.
The reason for this coverage is that if you are sued for damages by another party and you are responsible for the accident, in whole or in part, ICBC will only pay a settlement or
judgment against you to the maximum of your third - party liability
insurance limits.
Obtaining summary
judgment in federal court on all Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) claims based on separation pay benefits brought
against a national
insurance company.
The liability portion of an
insurance policy is specifically for defending and settling any claims or paying any
judgments rendered
against the insured in an automobile negligence claim.
The Court nevertheless distinguished such bailment agreement from a lease or construction contract, did not apply the defence of «tort immunity» pursuant to
insurance covenants in that context, and (after reserving for approximately two years) granted
judgment against the operator: Kruger Products Limited v. First Choice Logistics Inc., 2010 BCSC 1242 (CanLII).
Allen's representative work includes the successful defense of a multi-million dollar
insurance coverage and rescission suit by Lloyd's of London; dismissal of a six - figure claim for retroactive premiums against the St. John Community Development Center; summary judgments (affirmed on appeal) against Essex Insurance Company and Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company for breach of their respective insurance contracts; trial verdicts against Allstate Fire and Casualty Insurance Company and Liberty Mutual for insurance bad faith; and numerous confidential five, six, and seven figure settlements reached in insurance disputes of all types (including residential and commercial property, commercial general liability, auto liability, errors and omissions, negligent procurement, and insurer ba
insurance coverage and rescission suit by Lloyd's of London; dismissal of a six - figure claim for retroactive premiums
against the St. John Community Development Center; summary
judgments (affirmed on appeal)
against Essex
Insurance Company and Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company for breach of their respective insurance contracts; trial verdicts against Allstate Fire and Casualty Insurance Company and Liberty Mutual for insurance bad faith; and numerous confidential five, six, and seven figure settlements reached in insurance disputes of all types (including residential and commercial property, commercial general liability, auto liability, errors and omissions, negligent procurement, and insurer ba
Insurance Company and Liberty Mutual Fire
Insurance Company for breach of their respective insurance contracts; trial verdicts against Allstate Fire and Casualty Insurance Company and Liberty Mutual for insurance bad faith; and numerous confidential five, six, and seven figure settlements reached in insurance disputes of all types (including residential and commercial property, commercial general liability, auto liability, errors and omissions, negligent procurement, and insurer ba
Insurance Company for breach of their respective
insurance contracts; trial verdicts against Allstate Fire and Casualty Insurance Company and Liberty Mutual for insurance bad faith; and numerous confidential five, six, and seven figure settlements reached in insurance disputes of all types (including residential and commercial property, commercial general liability, auto liability, errors and omissions, negligent procurement, and insurer ba
insurance contracts; trial verdicts
against Allstate Fire and Casualty
Insurance Company and Liberty Mutual for insurance bad faith; and numerous confidential five, six, and seven figure settlements reached in insurance disputes of all types (including residential and commercial property, commercial general liability, auto liability, errors and omissions, negligent procurement, and insurer ba
Insurance Company and Liberty Mutual for
insurance bad faith; and numerous confidential five, six, and seven figure settlements reached in insurance disputes of all types (including residential and commercial property, commercial general liability, auto liability, errors and omissions, negligent procurement, and insurer ba
insurance bad faith; and numerous confidential five, six, and seven figure settlements reached in
insurance disputes of all types (including residential and commercial property, commercial general liability, auto liability, errors and omissions, negligent procurement, and insurer ba
insurance disputes of all types (including residential and commercial property, commercial general liability, auto liability, errors and omissions, negligent procurement, and insurer bad faith).
On October 28, 2010, First American Title
Insurance Company («First American») earned a
judgment and damages award in its favor in the amount of $ 434,913.39, plus interest, in Colorado state court
against Jeffrey Lavenhar.
In 1997, Haden hired Sacks to prepare a brief to the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in an appeal of an adverse
judgment against Haden and his company in Haden v. Metropolitan Life
Insurance Co., a commercial landlord - tenant dispute.
That could result in a
judgment against your driver, even if you don't file a claim with his or her
insurance company.
In Richardson East Baptist Church v. Philadelphia Indemnity
Insurance Co., [36] the insured appealed the trial court's
judgment that it take nothing on its claims
against the insurer.
In Alea London, Ltd. v. Nagy, et al, two plaintiffs, who had obtained a
judgment against a bar for injuries sustained in a bar fight, sued the bar's
insurance company for the
judgment amount.
The claimant, ESR, an
insurance broker, sought default
judgments pursuant to CPR Part 12.3 (1)
against all the defendants.
Fortunately, your home
insurance liability coverage will protect and defend you and pay any
judgment against you, up to your policy's liability limit.
In the event of a serious accident, you want enough
insurance to cover a
judgment against you in a lawsuit, without jeopardizing your personal assets.
The
insurance regulator, Irda, on the basis of a Supreme Court
judgment, had asked general insurers to increase their reserve requirement
against third party claims in 2011 - 12.
If you're involved in an accident south of the border, police will require you to prove you have
insurance that can cover any injuries or
judgments against you.
As with any
insurance policy, don't expect an umbrella policy to cover your intentional acts that cause damage, nor will it pay for punitive damages in
judgments against you or restitution you owe if convicted of a crime.
If you do not file a defence to the Statement of Claim / Summons issued by the other driver the (plaintiff), or their
insurance company, will get
judgment against you automatically (usually after 28 days).
If your court costs, legal fees and a
judgment against you exceed the coverage offered by your renters liability
insurance policy, you will be responsible for paying the excess costs out of pocket.
If a
judgment against you exceeds the liability limits of an underlying policy, such as auto or homeowners
insurance, a personal umbrella policy may help provide an additional layer of coverage.
As long as you have a good Diamond Bar renters
insurance policy you can relax, knowing that you won't go broke or have your credit damaged and a
judgment placed
against you because of some unfortunate accident.
If you're sued, liability
insurance will help pay for defense fees and
judgments against you.
Directors and Officers Liability
Insurance (D&O): Coverage for directors and officers of firms or organizations
against liability claims arising out of alleged errors in
judgment, breaches of duty, and wrongful acts related to their organizational activities.