Not exact matches
(2) signed by an individual, or his parent, to the effect that he has been denied admission to or not permitted to continue in attendance at a public college by reason of race, color, religion, or national origin, and the Attorney General believes the complaint is meritorious and certifies that the signer or signers of such complaint are unable, in his
judgment, to initiate and maintain appropriate legal proceedings for relief and that the institution of an action will materially further the orderly achievement of desegregation in public education, the Attorney General is authorized, after giving notice of such complaint to the appropriate school board or college authority and after certifying that he is satisfied that such board or authority has had a reasonable time to adjust the conditions alleged in such complaint, to institute for or in the name of the United States a civil action in any appropriate district court of the United States
against such parties and for such relief as may be appropriate, and such court shall have and shall exercise jurisdiction of proceedings instituted pursuant to this section, provided that nothing herein shall empower any official or court of the United States to issue any order seeking to achieve a racial balance in any school by requiring the transportation of pupils or students from one school to another or one school district to another in order to achieve such racial balance, or otherwise enlarge the existing power of the court to
insure compliance with constitutional standards.
We routinely file suits and collect
judgments against perpetrators of insurance fraud including both
insureds and medical providers.
In conjunction with the right to control the defense, an insurance company has «the duty not to gamble with the
insured's money by foregoing reasonable opportunities to settle a claim on terms that will protect the
insured against an excess
judgment.»
Typically, the tort victim agrees not to pursue the
insured / tortfeasor's personal assets and to limit recovery to insurance proceeds and equitable garnishment claims
against the insurance company after a
judgment is entered.
The SEF 44 endorsement for excess insurance, sometimes called Special or Family Protection Endorsements, indemnifies
insureds for any shortfall in payment of a
judgment for damages
against an underinsured tortfeasor, subject to the deductions set out in the endorsement itself.
Drivers purchase insurance to protect themselves
against the threat of being involved in a car accident
against an
insured driver who is really without assets to satisfy and sort of
judgment.
The liability portion of an insurance policy is specifically for defending and settling any claims or paying any
judgments rendered
against the
insured in an automobile negligence claim.
The
insured obtained
judgment against Intact on the coverage issue on a summary trial application and subsequently made an application for special costs.
In Richardson East Baptist Church v. Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Co., [36] the
insured appealed the trial court's
judgment that it take nothing on its claims
against the insurer.
These endorsements indemnify
insureds for any shortfall in the payment of a
judgment for damages
against an underinsured tortfeasor, subject to the deductions set out in the Endorsement.
California insurers providing this coverage help those who live in rentals to
insure their personal property
against losses from a number of different causes and also protect themselves
against the threat of liability
judgments inside and outside of the rental dwelling.
Such expenses include the costs for notarizing fraud affidavits; certified mail sent to law enforcement, financial institutions and credit agencies; lost income resulting from time off work to meet with law enforcement or credit agencies; loan application fees for reapplying for a loan; and reasonable attorney fees incurred to defend lawsuits brought
against the
insured and to remove criminal or civil
judgments.
By
insuring to avoid legal risk you're generally
insuring not only the risk of loss from a
judgment or settlement
against you, but also the risk of loss from the costs of defending
against that suit.