You can not be sent to prison, even if you do not pay the county - court
judgment as the court ordered.
Not exact matches
As I said previously, I will speak from a generic viewpoint, we must keep in mind that the «legislative framework» for election is a composite of four key authorities, namely and in
order of hierarchical authority: The Constitution, the Electoral Act,
judgments of
courts of records particularly the Supreme
Court; and the derivative guidelines for election approved by the election management body and l'm talking of INEC.
On 26th July 2016, the
court adopted the terms of settlement signed by the parties
as the
judgment of the
court and
ordered the parties to abide by the terms of the consent
judgment.
It is clear from the foregoing that this Government and the Attorney - General were clearly acting mischievously to politicize the excellent work of the Sole
Judgment Debt Commissioner by connecting the NPP's Attorney - General who merely paid upon the consent
judgment the Supreme
Court had refused to quash by certiorari during the NDC 2 Government
as a means of aborting the further investigations
ordered by the Commissioner.
Former Attorney General, Martin Amidu in his recent epistle said it is clear that the NDC government is «acting mischievously to politicize the excellent work of the Sole
Judgment Debt Commissioner by connecting the NPP's Attorney - General who merely paid upon the consent
judgment the Supreme
Court had refused to quash by certiorari during the NDC 2 Government
as a means of aborting the further investigations
ordered by the Commissioner.»
Describing Fayose
as being «the least qualified to be Ekiti governor» when he was chosen
as the party candidate, Ogundipe insisted that Fayose, Eddy Olafeso and others at the meeting were in contempt of the subsisting
judgment and
orders of the
Court of Appeal, Port Harcourt Division and the Federal High
Court, Lagos.
The Supreme
Court in 2014 ordered Mr. Woyome to pay back the money as Supreme Court judges unanimously granted the Attorney - General clearance to execute the court's judgment, ordering Mr. Woyome to refund the cash to the s
Court in 2014
ordered Mr. Woyome to pay back the money
as Supreme
Court judges unanimously granted the Attorney - General clearance to execute the court's judgment, ordering Mr. Woyome to refund the cash to the s
Court judges unanimously granted the Attorney - General clearance to execute the
court's judgment, ordering Mr. Woyome to refund the cash to the s
court's
judgment,
ordering Mr. Woyome to refund the cash to the state.
'' For me, I strongly hold the view that there is no dispute on the relevant / essential facts grating the claims of the appellants which relate to the determination of the action of the 1st respondent in setting up a caretaker committee of the PDP, Anambra State chapter during the pendency of the
judgment /
order of the Federal High
Court, recognizing the appellants
as the persons duly elected to that position.
He described the
court's
judgment on the unlawful escape from custody of the 13
as «shambolic and theatrical,» and that it will have grave ramifications for law and
order in the country.
According to an
order for declaratory
judgment which was sent by Rosenblum to a New York state Supreme
Court judge on Oct. 17, the mayor will seek to nullify a decision by the Democratic majority of Leon Potok, David Finch and Ilissa Miller on the village board to authorize a ballot referendum that — if passed by public vote on Election Day — would restrict Rosenblum's ability to appoint a village attorney
as well
as certain land use board members.
Cor filed a petition in state Supreme
Court in Onondaga County seeking a
judgment of $ 934,849 in back rent from Fort Schuyler Management Co. and an
order evicting the film hub, formally known
as the Central New York Hub for Emerging Nano Industries.
But the defense team could not sustain that
judgment,
as EOCO filed an ex-parte motion the following day, April 24, 2018, and obtained another
order from the same
court for the accounts to be frozen again.
Kofi Adams is praying the
court for an
order for «an unconditional retraction and an unqualified apology for the said defamatory comments / broadcast / publication, doing so separately and in the Daily Graphic newspaper, and for same to be given equal prominence
as the complained comments / broadcast / publication within 14 days from the day of
judgment.»
The development is
as a result of the May 4, 2018
judgment of the
Court of Appeal, Lagos Division, dismantling the restraining
orders of the Lagos Division of the Federal High
Court earlier obtained by the federal lawmaker.
Speaking with our correspondent on Thursday, the Anambra REC said its legal department had studied the
judgments and asked it to go ahead with the election
as ordered by the
court of appeal as against the Tsoho Federal High Court judg
court of appeal
as against the Tsoho Federal High
Court judg
Court judgment.
The flagbearer of the All People's Party (APC), Hassan Ayariga, has welcomed a High
Court order to the Electoral Commission to allow him correct errors on his nomination forms describing the
judgment as proof that the nation's democracy is working.
We may disclose information about our users, including contact information, to respond to subpoenas,
court orders, legal process, and other law enforcement measures, and to comply with other legal obligations, such
as FCC requirements, in our sole
judgment.
(2) signed by an individual, or his parent, to the effect that he has been denied admission to or not permitted to continue in attendance at a public college by reason of race, color, religion, or national origin, and the Attorney General believes the complaint is meritorious and certifies that the signer or signers of such complaint are unable, in his
judgment, to initiate and maintain appropriate legal proceedings for relief and that the institution of an action will materially further the orderly achievement of desegregation in public education, the Attorney General is authorized, after giving notice of such complaint to the appropriate school board or college authority and after certifying that he is satisfied that such board or authority has had a reasonable time to adjust the conditions alleged in such complaint, to institute for or in the name of the United States a civil action in any appropriate district
court of the United States against such parties and for such relief
as may be appropriate, and such
court shall have and shall exercise jurisdiction of proceedings instituted pursuant to this section, provided that nothing herein shall empower any official or
court of the United States to issue any
order seeking to achieve a racial balance in any school by requiring the transportation of pupils or students from one school to another or one school district to another in
order to achieve such racial balance, or otherwise enlarge the existing power of the
court to insure compliance with constitutional standards.
However, if a debt has resulted in a
court judgment against you, the debt collector can contact your employer
as long
as they have a
court order.
A civil
judgment is a final decision made by the
court ordering a party to pay a specific amount
as restitution for money owed
as a result of monetary loss and damages.
a) Disputes filed - 18 months b) Inquiries - 2 years c) Payment profile -5 years d) Information related to a consumers payment behavior such
as slow payer, defaulted or absconded - 1 year e) Information relating to the action that a credit provider has taken against a consumer to enforce a debt such
as handed over, legal action or write - off - 2 years f) Debt restructuring - Until a clearance certificate is given g) Civil
court judgments - 5 years or until the court removes it h) Administration orders (orders to put a consumer under administration)- 10 years or until the court removes it i) Sequestrations (order given by the court where the consumer is insolvent)- 10 years or until the court removes it j) Liquidations (order given by the court where the consumer is insolvent)- no time limit k) Court order removing a liquidation or sequestrations after all the debt was paid - 5 years l) Other information (information not covered above)- 2 years Other Useful Topics Learn how to dispute information on your credit report in South Af
court judgments - 5 years or until the
court removes it h) Administration orders (orders to put a consumer under administration)- 10 years or until the court removes it i) Sequestrations (order given by the court where the consumer is insolvent)- 10 years or until the court removes it j) Liquidations (order given by the court where the consumer is insolvent)- no time limit k) Court order removing a liquidation or sequestrations after all the debt was paid - 5 years l) Other information (information not covered above)- 2 years Other Useful Topics Learn how to dispute information on your credit report in South Af
court removes it h) Administration
orders (
orders to put a consumer under administration)- 10 years or until the
court removes it i) Sequestrations (order given by the court where the consumer is insolvent)- 10 years or until the court removes it j) Liquidations (order given by the court where the consumer is insolvent)- no time limit k) Court order removing a liquidation or sequestrations after all the debt was paid - 5 years l) Other information (information not covered above)- 2 years Other Useful Topics Learn how to dispute information on your credit report in South Af
court removes it i) Sequestrations (
order given by the
court where the consumer is insolvent)- 10 years or until the court removes it j) Liquidations (order given by the court where the consumer is insolvent)- no time limit k) Court order removing a liquidation or sequestrations after all the debt was paid - 5 years l) Other information (information not covered above)- 2 years Other Useful Topics Learn how to dispute information on your credit report in South Af
court where the consumer is insolvent)- 10 years or until the
court removes it j) Liquidations (order given by the court where the consumer is insolvent)- no time limit k) Court order removing a liquidation or sequestrations after all the debt was paid - 5 years l) Other information (information not covered above)- 2 years Other Useful Topics Learn how to dispute information on your credit report in South Af
court removes it j) Liquidations (
order given by the
court where the consumer is insolvent)- no time limit k) Court order removing a liquidation or sequestrations after all the debt was paid - 5 years l) Other information (information not covered above)- 2 years Other Useful Topics Learn how to dispute information on your credit report in South Af
court where the consumer is insolvent)- no time limit k)
Court order removing a liquidation or sequestrations after all the debt was paid - 5 years l) Other information (information not covered above)- 2 years Other Useful Topics Learn how to dispute information on your credit report in South Af
Court order removing a liquidation or sequestrations after all the debt was paid - 5 years l) Other information (information not covered above)- 2 years Other Useful Topics Learn how to dispute information on your credit report in South Africa.
To the extent permitted by law, we shall not be liable for any Losses by or with respect to the Account, except to the extent that such Losses are actual Losses proven with reasonable certainty, are not speculative, are proven to have been fairly within the contemplation of the parties
as of the date hereof, and are determined by a
court of competent jurisdiction or an arbitration panel in a final non-appealable
judgment or
order to have resulted solely from our gross negligence or willful misconduct and without limiting the generality of the foregoing, we will not be liable for any indirect, special, incidental or consequential damages or other losses (regardless of whether such damages or other losses were reasonably foreseeable).
These exceptions could be broadly categorized
as (1) debts owed to the government or subject to a
court order, such
as certain tax debts or child support obligations; and (2) debts incurred through some fault of the debtor, such
as those arising from civil
judgments for fraud or other injury.
In 1975, the defendants were found liable for negligence and conflict of interest, were removed
as executors of the Rothko estate by
court order, and, along with Marlborough Gallery, were required to pay a $ 9.2 million damages
judgment to the estate.
Cognizant of the fact that the executive
order could render any decision on CPP legality a mere advisory opinion, the D.C. Circuit
Court of Appeals withheld its
judgment for at least 60 days
as this EPA review was undertaken.
The
judgment takes effect from the day when it is given or made, or such later date
as the
court may specify (FPR 2010, r 29.15); and an appeal is against that
judgment, not the
order.
Lightfoot appealed both the new trial
order and the trial
court's denial of its motions for
judgment as a matter of law.
If you choose not to follow the Protocol, you issue proceedings and either your debtor is familiar with the Protocol or instructs solicitors who are, then the following sanctions can be imposed by the
court: - • An
order staying the proceedings which also requires compliance with the Protocol; • An
order that if you have not complied you pay the costs of the proceedings or part of the costs of the other side even if you obtain
judgment in your favour; • An
order that those costs are paid on a more stringent basis known
as an indemnity basis; • An
order depriving the party who is at fault of any entitlement to interest or alternatively awarding interest at a reduced rate; • Depending on who is at fault the
court can also
order payment of a higher interest rate of up to 10 % above base rate.
The
court sometimes
orders that some debts, such
as debts from
court judgments in personal injury cases, be paid in full before a discharge will be granted.
Adopting the perspective of the European Union, therefore, the dicta of the UK Supreme
Court judgment can be regarded
as an explicit endorsement and acceptance of what Kaarlo Tuori describes
as the
Court of Justice of the European Union's constitutional function of «positioning» the Union legal
order through the creation of juridical doctrines such
as primacy and direct effect.
This notion is fortified by the remarks made by the
Court, seemingly
as an afterthought, in paragraphs 48 and 49 of the
judgment in the case of X and X, where the
Court notes that a decision to allow third - country nationals to lodging applications for visas on the basis of the Visa Code in
order to apply for international protection in the Member State to which they will travel would undermine the general structure of the Dublin system.
As a further general point, it may be posited that the
judgment's fundamental (re --RRB- statement of the United Kingdom's constitutional
order was motivated by the justices» desire to solidify the Supreme
Court's status in the face of the oncoming constitutional storm presented by Brexit.
As the Supreme
Court in Morguard emphasized, however, the Act does not in any way limit the far larger application of comity in regard to
orders and
judgments not covered by the Act (i.e. non-money
judgments or foreign
judgments other than those select U.S. states).
The most important thing to note at the outset is that Alberta
courts generally exercise the concept of «comity», which is defined
as the recognition by one jurisdiction's
court of the
judgments and
orders of another.
In particular, this
judgment from the jurisdiction's apex
court has clarified definitively the limits of an enforcing Court's power to order security as a condition on the right to have a decision of a properly arguable challenge under the New York Convention 1958 and the English Arbitration Act
court has clarified definitively the limits of an enforcing
Court's power to order security as a condition on the right to have a decision of a properly arguable challenge under the New York Convention 1958 and the English Arbitration Act
Court's power to
order security
as a condition on the right to have a decision of a properly arguable challenge under the New York Convention 1958 and the English Arbitration Act 1996.
So long
as the foreign
court properly exercised jurisdiction, an Alberta
court will generally enforce that
judgment or
order.
When parties in the conciliation proceedings reach an agreement approved by the conciliation committee, the agreement is entered in the
court's case record and it has the same force
as a
judgment or an
order of determination.
However, he held that the execution should not go beyond the DIFC jurisdiction,
as Article 7 (2) of the Judicial Authority Law only allowed
judgments, decisions and
orders rendered by the DIFC
Courts to be referred for execution.
The
Courts in Ontario may in the required circumstances recognize and enforce Georgia equitable
orders such
as injunctions (not just money
judgments).
In a
judgment released last July in Smith v. Inco, the Ontario Superior
Court ordered Inco to pay an estimated $ 36 million to compensate approximately 7,000 homeowners in the Port Colborne area for the loss of property values they suffered
as a result of nickel contamination of their land.
A Singapore
court that grants a
judgment of divorce, judicial separation or nullity of marriage, has the power to
order division between the parties of any matrimonial asset or the sale of any such asset and the division between the parties of the proceeds of the sale of any such asset «in such proportions
as the
court thinks just and equitable.»
(a)
order that the Council's contract award decision be set aside, (b)
order that the Council amend its records to reflect the lawful tender evaluation scores,
as found in the
Court's
judgment, and (c) declare that Woods had submitted the most economically advantageous tender.
Research legal cases and prepare documentation such
as legal reports, memoranda,
court orders and
judgments.
The
Courts in Ontario may in the required circumstances recognize and enforce U.S. equitable
orders such
as injunctions (not just money
judgments).
In its final
judgment, the
Court ordered Russia to pay 6,000 euros (EUR) for her mental distress,
as well
as her costs and legal fees.
In
order to protect
courts of law and administrative tribunals, a principle of deliberative secrecy applies to shield those decision - makers from having to make transparent or provide information in regards to the intellectual or other process by which they may have arrived at their decision except
as may stand on the record within their reasons for
judgment or opinion.
The
Courts in Ontario may in the required circumstances recognize and enforce Missouri equitable
orders such
as injunctions (not just money
judgments).
The
Courts in Ontario may in the required circumstances recognize and enforce Washington equitable
orders such
as injunctions (not just money
judgments).
The
Courts in Ontario may in the required circumstances recognize and enforce Ohio equitable
orders such
as injunctions (not just money
judgments).
The
order of admission is the
judgment of the
court that the parties possess the requisite qualifications and are entitled to appear
as attorneys and counselors and conduct causes therein.