Sentences with phrase «judgment awarded plaintiff»

A negligence suit can cost you legal fees as well as any settlement or judgment awarded the plaintiff.

The court denied plaintiff's motion for summary judgment that individual defendant was liable for the default judgment awarded plaintiff against corporate defendant because plaintiff failed to pierce the corporate veil.

L.B. Kaye International Realty Commercial Svcs., Inc. v. 100 Varick Realty (15 A.D. 3d 176) judgment awarding plaintiff real estate broker damages in the principal amount of $ 133,761.00 affirmed; appellate court does not disturb trial court's finding that defendant intentionally excluded broker from exercising the exclusive leasing rights it obtained under the brokerage agreement thereby entitling broker to full commission when defendant leased the premises covered by the agreement on its own.

Not exact matches

Appeal from judgment entered by the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Mark D. Fox, Magistrate Judge), which held that defendant Board of Education of the Newburgh Enlarged City School District intentionally discriminated against plaintiff Santina Polera in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq., and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act, 29 U.S.C. § 794, and awarded damages to plaintiff.

A business, such as a mortgage company or bank, or an individual can file a civil lawsuit and if the plaintiff is awarded damages then a judgment will be rendered in their favor.

It said I was «served» and never appeared, so judgment was awarded for six figures to the plaintiff whom I had never heard of.

Represented Bayer in the Second Circuit, successfully defending an award of summary judgment and the exclusion of plaintiffs» experts on appeal in a multidistrict litigation regarding Mirena, the company's intrauterine contraceptive device.

Reasons for judgment were released today by the BC Supreme Court (Mariano v. Campbell) awarding a Plaintiff just over $ 115,000 as a result of injuries sustained in a 2006 rear end collision.

Notwithstanding the liberal «relation back» principles of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and despite the plaintiffs» claim of «fraudulent concealment,» the Appellate Practice Group secured an award of summary judgment in favor of all additional defendants based on the statute of limitations defense.

On appeal, the court held that the plaintiffs could not do so because the statute of limitations had run, and thereby entered judgment notwithstanding the verdict on the plaintiffs» $ 38.5 million punitive damages award.

Ultimately, the court awarded judgment in favour of the plaintiffs.

However, a trial judge has discreton to dny a plaintiff costs (fees included) where the judgment could have been rendered in a court of lesser jurisdiction, meaning the compensatory award is $ 25,000 or less.

The Court of Appeals remanded the case so the trial court could enter a judgment on the arbitration award and allowed plaintiffs» counsel to seek prejudgment interest at that time, but it noted the six year delay could pose a challenge to the interest award.

An award of damages; the receiving of a favorable judgment; the winning of a lawsuit; a decree of a court granting the plaintiff part or all of his claim or claims against a defendant.

Her Statement of Defence is struck out and I award summary judgment in favour of the Plaintiff.

The plaintiff had acknowledged «the certification and summary judgment motions for which costs are sought were factually and legally complex, important to the parties and... in the circumstances, they could reasonably expect to be required to pay a meaningful costs award to the defendants.»

Obtained defense verdict on motion for judgment at close of plaintiff's evidence, obtained award of attorneys» fees, and successfully defended judgment and award on appeal.

Short clear reasons for judgment were released by Mr. Justice Savage of the BC Supreme Court yesterday awarding a Plaintiff compensation for car accident related headaches.

Reasons for judgment were released by the BC Supreme Court yesterday awarding a Plaintiff in a BC personal injury claim «costs» despite the fact that the Plaintiff's award was within the small claims court jurisdiction.

This is because if the injured plaintiff gets a jury award for more than your insurance policy limits, you, personally, can be held responsible to pay that portion of the judgment.

[1] On March 1, 2013, after an eleven day trial, I awarded judgment to the plaintiff for $ 16,042,669 plus pre-judgment interest and costs.

The Plaintiff sought to have recognised and enforce a New York arbitration award and related judgments, and pre-emptorily sought approval of the funding agreement it had entered into, to determine whether it would contravene champerty and be unenforceable.

Mr. Romain also successfully represented the former Chairman and CEO of Fannie Mae against securities fraud claims in which the plaintiff sought more than $ 2 billion in damages, and the court awarded his client summary judgment on all counts.

The Cagle Law Firm has been awarded one of the 10 Best in Missouri for Customer Satisfaction and named Most Wining Plaintiff Law Firm for Reported Verdicts and Judgments in 2012 - Missouri Lawyers Weekly.

In one the first ICBC claims to head to trial under Rule 68 that I'm aware of reasons for judgment were released today awarding a Plaintiff over $ 180,000 in compensation including $ 75,000 for pain and suffering as a result of 2 motor vehicle accidents.

Similarly, Cecil et al. found that defendants moving for summary judgment were awarded summary judgment in full 64 % of the time, whereas plaintiffs moving for summary judgment were awarded summary judgment in full only 39 % of the time.90 In a subsequent study of all federal district court summary judgment activity in 2006, Cecil and Cort found that moving parties succeeded more often (57 %) than non-moving parties (43 %), as was the case for moving parties in federal court in our sample (73 % to 27 %).91 Although success rates in our sample were higher than success rates in the Cecil study and the Cecil and Cort study, a higher success rate is expected given that we excluded motions seeking partial summary judgment from our sample.

In Hospadales v. McCoy, the defendants appealed a judgment in a truck accident case that awarded the plaintiff damages in the amount of $ 292,000 for past pain and suffering, past medical expenses, and past lost earning capacity.

The magistrate judge recommended partially granting plaintiff's motion for default judgment and awarding statutory damages in the amount of $ 5,000.»

Trial decision of the Hon. Justice G.C. Hawco awarding the Plaintiff (client) full judgment with interest and costs throughout in regard to a claim of debt and dismissing the counterclaim of the Defendants alleging various matters.

With respect to the plaintiff's successful default judgment against the defendant, Robert Card, the plaintiffs were awarded $ 9,346.36 inclusive of fees, disbursements and GST.

In Munoz v. Sierra Systems Group Inc., 2015 BCSC 269, a summary judgment motion, the plaintiff was awarded 10 months reasonable notice of dismissal despite the fact that the plaintiff, a 43 - year - old senior systems administrator, had only 2 years and 7 months of service when he was dismissed from his employment.

High dollar award judgments and a supreme court that allowed a plaintiff to bring suit against a company for another manufacturer's product have given Alabama a less - than - stellar litigation reputation.

Damages were awarded and after the allowance for the shared liability the plaintiff, who had attained majority by the time judgment was given, obtained judgment for $ 64,000 and one - half of his costs.

The plaintiffs acknowledge that «the certification and summary judgment motions for which costs are sought were factually and legally complex, important to the parties and... in the circumstances, they could reasonably expect to be required to pay a meaningful costs award to the defendants.»

[29] The plaintiff submitted that the award of costs in this case exceeds the total amount of the judgment.

In his written submissions, the plaintiff states that «[i] f the court orders that the Plaintiff is to pay costs to ICBC, it means that Mr. Anderson must pay the entire judgment award to ICBC, instead of spending this money on his health condition and prognosiplaintiff states that «[i] f the court orders that the Plaintiff is to pay costs to ICBC, it means that Mr. Anderson must pay the entire judgment award to ICBC, instead of spending this money on his health condition and prognosiPlaintiff is to pay costs to ICBC, it means that Mr. Anderson must pay the entire judgment award to ICBC, instead of spending this money on his health condition and prognosis.»

Upon issuance of judgment [for punitive damages], the state shall have all rights due a judgment creditor until such judgment is satisfied and shall stand on equal footing with the plaintiff of the original case in securing a recovery after payment to the plaintiff of damages awarded other than as punitive damages.»)

§ 51 -12-5.1 (e)(2)(«Upon issuance of judgment [for punitive damages], the state shall have all rights due a judgment creditor until such judgment is satisfied and shall stand on equal footing with the plaintiff of the original case in securing a recovery after payment to the plaintiff of damages awarded other than as punitive damages.»).

The plaintiff brought a motion to lift the stay and for declarations that the stay did not operate with respect to enforcement of judgment, that the judgment was an award of damages for bodily harm intentionally inflicted pursuant to s. 178 (1)(a. 1) of the BIA, and that the judgment survived bankruptcy and was not a debt released by order of discharge.

[7] The trial judge awarded the plaintiff damages of $ 476,498.86, which amounted to the initial judgment, plus pre-judgment interest and costs.

Your liability coverage will help pay your legal fees and any judgment or settlement awarded to the plaintiff.

Following a bench trial, the trial court entered judgment that awarded plaintiffs $ 409,846 in damages for defendants» failure to notify the buyer of competing offer.

In the claim against the seller, the court granted default judgment for Plaintiffs and awarded $ 2,000 in statutory damages.

Salvador v. Uncle Sam Auctions & Realty, Inc. (30 A.D. 3d 861)- judgments awarding brokerage commission and counsel's fees affirmed; Supreme Court resolved key factual disputes in favor of broker based upon credible testimony; an award of counsel's fees was authorized by the contract; commission awarded in the amount of $ 87,500.00 and attorney's fees award in the amount of $ 44,500.00; Appellate Division declined to reduce the amount of counsel's fees awarded as excess legal work resulted in large part from unavailing and often unnecessary paths pursued and tactics employed by plaintiff; request for appellate counsel fees should be directed to court of original instance