Sentences with phrase «judgment by operation»

A missed payment becomes a judgment by operation of law.

Not exact matches

We should remember his words: «It was the greatest and boldest operation ever undertaken by the Federal Reserve System, and, in my judgment, resulted in one of the most costly errors committed by it or any banking system in the last 75 years.

«It was the greatest and boldest operation ever undertaken by the Federal Reserve System, and, in my judgment, resulted in one of the most costly errors committed by it or any banking system in the last 75 years.

There is an irreducible conflict, a radical opposition, between the creative operation of each of these qualities, corresponding each time to a thetic16 judgment, and the ambition that human consciousness can have of verifying them for itself, by itself.

A constantly widening gap occurs between the reflexive judgment which produces the criteria of the divine by an entirely interior operation, and the historical judgment which is used to group together externally the meaning of the given testimonies.

The Contractor hereby agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the Government, its officers and employees from and against all claims, demands, damages, liabilities, losses, suits and judgments (including all costs and expenses incident thereto) which may be suffered by, accrue against, be charged to or recoverable from the Government, its officers and employees by reason of injury to or death of any person other than officers, agents, or employees of the Government or by reason of damage to property of others of whatsoever kind (other than the property of the Government, its officers, agents or employees) arising out of the operation of the aircraft.

This reasoning was, however, invalidated by the General Court in its Aéroports de Paris judgment of 12 December 2000 (T - 128 / 98, confirmed on appeal by the Court in case C - 82 / 01 P), which clarified that the operation of an airport constitutes an economic activity, although the case concerned Article 102 TFEU and rules on predatory pricing.

Judge Reiss granted the defendants» motion for summary judgment, finding that «the only reasonable interpretation of that language is that it requires Killington Ltd. to provide the designated passholder free use of all ski lifts operated by Killington Ltd. at the Killington Ski Area so long as it operates in that area... «The term corporation, she wrote, «clearly refers to the named corporations, Sherburne and Killington Ltd.» and «reveals no intention to bind Killington Ltd's successors... To the contrary, Killington Ltd.'s obligations under the passes clearly terminate with its cessation of operations in the area.»

The application of the «real and substantial connection» test for enforcement of foreign judgments was further clarified by the Ontario Court of Appeal in a recent decision, part of a bitter and protracted legal battle over nearly $ 10 billion in environmental damages caused by the operations of Texaco (later acquired by the defendant Chevron) in Ecuador.

This point concerned paragraphs 96, 110 and 111 of the General Court's judgment, in which it stated that «runways are essential for the purposes of the economic activities performed by an airport operator», that «the objective of constructing a runway is linked to the main economic activity of an airport», and that «the construction and extension of the runway are pre-conditions for its operation».

According to them, the Aéroports de Paris judgment only applies to the operation of an airport infrastructure, as it consisted in offering services to airlines and various service providers in exchange of a fee which is (to a large degree) freely fixed by the manager.

the term «parental responsibility» shall mean all rights and duties relating to the person or the property of a child which are given to a natural or legal person by judgment, by operation of law or by an agreement having legal effect.

Custody shall be considered to be exercised jointly when, pursuant to a judgment or by operation of law, one holder of parental responsibility can not decide on the child's place of residence without the consent of another holder of parental responsibility.

Even if national law does not provide for enforceability by operation of law, notwithstanding any appeal, of a judgment requiring the return of the child mentioned in Article 11 (b)(8), the court of origin may declare the judgment enforceable.

In practice the judgment of the Lords reaffirms the status quo as propounded in R v Board of Trustees of the Science Museum [1993] 1 WLR 1171 and R v Associated Octel Co Ltd [1994] 4 All ER 1051, 1063a, where, in the latter case, the allegation was that there had been a contravention of s 3 (1), Lord Justice Stuart - Smith said: «If there is a risk of injury to the health and safety of the persons not employed by the employer, whether to the contractor's men or members of the public, and, a fortiori, if there is actual injury as a result of the conduct of that operation there is prima facie liability, subject to the defence of reasonable practicability.»

Sedley LJ observed in his dissenting judgment (at para 6) that in the «great majority» of cases the operation of immigration controls will ordinarily meet the criteria of proportionality, because immigration controls are established by law.

• Exceptional mechanical aptitude aimed at controlling and operating complex machinery • Deep technical knowledge of CAD / CAM technology and how it is used for machine operations • Great physical stamina and dexterity to perform repetitive work activities and movements • Well - versed in reading and interpreting blueprints with a view to understand machine schematics and models • Demonstrated ability to learn new machine operations and adjust machine parts to meet specific instructions • Capable of working in a high noise environment • Able to monitor and assess performance of machinery and make needed adjustments • Proven ability to perform quality control analysis by conducting tests and inspections • Exceptional time management skills aimed at ensuring that machine operations are carried out in a time efficient manner • Excellent judgment and decision making skills; ability to consider costs and benefits of optimal machine operations • Critical thinking abilities aimed at identifying alternative solutions to machine operation problems • Complex problem solving skills targeted at evaluating possible machine operational issues • Able to plan, organize and schedule machine operations in sync with production agendas • Track record of prioritizing work activities in accordance to scheduled operating precedence • Skilled at dismantling, repairing and maintaining equipment • Knowledge of operating hand and power tools used in the production trade

The «business judgment rule» is a standard commonly used by courts to evaluate the decisions made by a corporation's board of directors, which is a deferential standard under which courts defer to the good faith decisions made by a corporate board of directors related to the company's operations.