Sentences with phrase «judgment by patent»

[10] This practice is considered to be a restrictive interpretation of the judgment by patent attorneys.

Not exact matches

Disgraced Korean stem cell scientist Woo Suk Hwang, who is awaiting a court judgment due next month that could send him to jail for embezzling research funds, got some good news last Friday when a separate court ruled a dog cloning technique he developed since being dismissed by Seoul National University is different from the procedure patented by the school.

In addition, given that many products will include multiple ornamental features that could be covered by design patents, this raises the possibility that a company could get hit for multiple judgments for all its profits.

This ruling is not thermonuclear on its own, but in its aftermath, we will not only see a lot of wrangling over a judgment as a matter of law to overrule the jury and over injunctive relief but there will also be, even more importantly, a push by Apple to enforce many more design patents and utility (hardware and software) patents against Samsung.

Also, one of Samsung's patents is not listed because it was thrown out by Judge Koh on summary judgment and can't be reasserted against Apple unless the facts change in Samsung's favor (hard to imagine) or the appeals court decides in Samsung's favor.

The case including the most lawyers from Chambers» list over the previous 2 terms was the patent case Oil States Energy Services v. Greene's Energy Group Although Oil States has actually not gotten as much protection in the popular press as other cases like Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission, the possible effects of this judgment for numerous services developed big stakes for effective entities impacted by patent lawsuits.

For example, if China was sued for violating a utility patent on the Humvee design and a U.S. federal court found that it was a commercial activity of a state owned company rather than an act of the Chinese military, per se, the U.S. court could enter a judgment against China and the patent owned could collect it by seizing U.S. Treasury bonds owned by China.

Apple's winning streak continues for now: after (finally) obtaining a preliminary injunction against the Galaxy Tab 10.1 and winning by a wide margin a battle over a long list of expert reports, Apple has just been cleared of infringement of one of the three Samsung patents it was attacking in its very focused summary judgment motions.

Today it was also cleared, by summary judgment, of infringement of one of Samsung's patents - in - suit.

In short, shapewear industry giant Spanx filed a request for declaratory judgment in federal court in Atlanta in March, in response to a cease and desist letter sent in January by the Yummie Tummie shapewear brand, which claimed that Spanx's designs infringe Yummie Tummie's patents for three - panel slimming camisoles.

This appeal was brought by Rovi against a judgment and consequential revocation order made by Mr John Baldwin QC on 14 July 2014 (Rovi Solutions Corporation & Another v Virgin Media Ltd & Others [2014] EWHC 2301 (Pat)-RRB- in respect of European Patent (UK) 1,327,209, which the judge ruled was invalid due to the lack of an inventive step.

«8th Circuit judgment «clouded by wicked weed» Main Does your patent paperwork make you a prime target for ID theft?»

On April 21, 2016, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania granted a motion for summary judgment filed by Brooks Kushman on behalf of its client, Ford Motor Company, in a case involving a patent for fuel injection system technology.

We obtained judgment of non-infringement (affirmed by the Federal Circuit) in a patent infringement bench trial litigation in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.

Three patents were asserted, with one being dismissed on summary judgment, one being dismissed by JNOV after trial, and the third being dismissed after an appeal to the Federal Circuit.

To this end, I would like to indicate that, in my believe, we should associate this case with the distinction made by the Court of Justice; that is, the existence of an intellectual property rights and its improper or proper exercise, which could also be a vital argument in the present judgment (the improper exercise of Lundbeck's process patent).

The federal district court in Tyler, Texas, did not commit reversible error in entering judgment against ALE USA (formerly known as Alcatel - Lucent Enterprise USA) for infringement of networking patents asserted by Chrimar Systems, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Ci

The federal district court in Las Vegas erred in granting summary judgment to patent infringement defendant DigiDeal as to certain cancelled claims (upon reexamination by the USPTO) of U.S. Patent No. 7,523,935 because suits based upon cancelled claims must be dismisspatent infringement defendant DigiDeal as to certain cancelled claims (upon reexamination by the USPTO) of U.S. Patent No. 7,523,935 because suits based upon cancelled claims must be dismissPatent No. 7,523,935 because suits based upon cancelled claims must be dismissed for

The case including the most lawyers from Chambers» list over the previous 2 terms was the patent case Oil States Energy Services v. Greene's Energy Group Although Oil States has actually not gotten as much protection in the popular press as other cases like Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission, the possible effects of this judgment for numerous organisations produced big stakes for effective entities impacted by patent lawsuits.