Sentences with phrase «judgment calls like»

We process every complaint we receive — thousands a day — and many of them require relatively simple judgment calls like whether a Gamertag or profile content abides by the Xbox Live Code of Conduct.

Not exact matches

You'd think that investors would be among the most cold - blooded and rational consumers of information — after all, fortunes depend on them making bias - free judgments about what they hear on earnings calls — but according to this new research, they are actually highly swayed by one tiny shift in language, just like everyone.

And his theory of the secret, like his theory of the parables as purposely meant to mystify those who heard them, (Mark: 4 - 11) and his theory of a divine judgment upon the Jews causing them to be blind to Jesus» true calling and mission (perhaps a Pauline idea, (Cf. Rom.

«Mr. Graham's calling is not to pass judgment, but to proclaim the biblical truth that Jesus is the only way to heaven» ------ I'd like to know what Mr. Graham's response is to the fact that not all humans in this world know who Jesus is.

If you have not repented then you are in error (in spite of all your accusations) If you have repented and have called upon the Almighty God to save you and cleanse you from your sin, Then what is the purpose of these letters (unless you want to pass judgment on those that do not believe like you).

Many of these practical judgments are required in education, which Dewey liked to call «the laboratory in which philosophic distinctions become concrete and are tested» (MW9: 339).

John used this metaphor to call on people to bear fruit resulting from repentance, warning that if one did not produce good fruit, one would soon be chopped down at the judgment like a diseased tree (Q 3:8 - 9).

Whereas the principle set forth in Deuteronomy may provide some means of measuring the accuracy of the predictions of an astrologer like Jeane Dixon or the lucrative prognostications of a dispensationalist like Hal Lindsey, it is less well suited to discerning the reliability of a call to moral judgment and decisive action.

Just would like to call attention to 1 Corinthians 1:10 — «Now I plead with you, brethren, by the name of our Lord Jesus Christ that you all speak the same thing, and that there be no divisions among you, but that you be perfectly joined together in the same mind and in the same judgment.»

The answer to the other is a proposition of value, what the Germans call a Werthurtheil, or what we may, if we like, denominate a spiritual judgment.

First, like Jonah, Jesus was called by God to go to a people upon whom judgment was coming.

The criteria of probability of success and proportionality, as well as other just war principles like last resort and even just cause, require judgment calls.

Like many other activities of ministry — rendering a theological judgment, structuring a sermon, being present to persons in acute crisis, discerning the plan of action and strategy to which a congregation is called at a particular moment in its life — choosing a myth requires the complex interworking of rational judgment, adequate information, emotional openness and self - awareness, intuition, sensitivity, prayerful reflection, and more.

We've done so because the people at the top prefer a permissive atmosphere that allows us to do as we wish» as long as we don't hurt anyone, a judgment call that ends up ruling out things upper - middle - class people don't like, such as smoking and putting glass bottles in plastics - only recycling bins.

Also, he sees freedom and equality as perennial principles of justice that, like agape in relation to philia and justice, serve as judgment on their approximations (or lack thereof), and call communities to fuller approximations.

All three seemed judgment calls rather than obvious and indeed it's hard for the officials to see everything like a quick touch off a defender, but nevertheless it was an unlucky match for us re.

Whether or not a diet that has you eating baby food for a week feels like torture is a judgment call, but the results certainly speak for themselves.

Once they have a firm grasp of the client's likes and dislikes, the matchmakers make a judgment call about whether they can help that individual find the right relationship.

Although I'm in the camp that would like to see the film in 1.66:1 if that's what it was intended to be seen in, it's a judgment call that the filmmakers decide upon.

But, maybe in light of his recent weight loss (props to homeboy — he's dropped like a Franklin on the Toledos), he managed to shed the roll that his better - judgment called home.

This approach is used in districts like Long Beach and San Mateo, California, and is encouraged in states like Massachusetts, Oregon, and Washington that call for multiple measures of student learning to be combined in a judgment system with evidence of teacher practice.

«Egghead Weds Hourglass» screamed one newspaper headline when the opposites - attract pair wed in 1956, while negative predictions and snap judgments were doled out by pundits like Truman Capote, who quipped the marriage could be called «Death of a Playwright.»

First - year litigators attend regular classes on topics like «how to do doc review, make privilege calls and draft summary judgment motions,» which all gear up to a third - year trial skills workshop.

However a reading of the almost 200 page judgment — not something that everyone feels like doing, fair enough — discloses a detailed and highly specific analysis of a particular group of self represented litigants — the so - called OPCA's.

Here is the price of getting your name taken off a post like this: (1) a personal apology, including taking responsibility for either bad judgment or for inadequate supervision, (2) the name of the marketer who spammed on your behalf, so that I can call out that person and / or company by name, and (3) sufficient proof (like email correspondence with that marketer) to show that you're not just throwing some random marketer under the bus.

You can imagine some sort of structure, almost like a Supreme Court, that is made up of independent folks who don't work for Facebook, who ultimately make the final judgment call on what should be acceptable speech in a community that reflects the social norms and values of people all around the world.

He hinted at «some sort of structure» which like a Supreme Court but made up of independent people will make the final judgment call on what should be an acceptable speech in a community.

The article in the NY Post called the handsets «useless», citing law enforcement officials that said things like, «Nobody purchases 36,000 phones based on the judgment of one person», and, «I don't care if you're Jesus f — king Christ, you get a panel of experts.»

As for taking advantage of my «power,» I hope my actions speak for themselves, but I'm a big believer in forum moderators being as invisible as possible (in the mod context) and when necessary, being a lot like good judges — if there's ever a conflict of interest, refer it over to another mod to make judgment calls.