Sentences with phrase «judgment hearing took»

The summary judgment hearing took over three days of court time.

Not exact matches

Knowing how hard we work, how seriously we take our role, and how deeply we care about our students, it is disheartening to hear the harsh judgments that many people so frequently make about teachers.
Clamence was walking across the Pont des Arts on another occasion, when he heard a mysterious burst of laughter, which he takes as a mocking judgment on his life.
Christianity becomes an instrument of mental distress when biblical passages such as this are taken literally: «You have heard that it was said to the men of old, «You shall not kill; and whoever kills shall be liable to judgment
«Take notice that the appellant being dissatisfied with the decision of the governorship election tribunal for Rivers state, sitting in Abuja, contained in the judgment of the tribunal coram Hon. Justice Suleiman Ambursa (chairman), Hon. Justice Wesley Ibrahim Leha (member) and Hon. Justice Bayo Taiwo (member)(sitting in court no. 23 of the FCT high court dated the 24th of October 2015, doth hereby appeal to the court of appeal upon the grounds set out in paragraph 3 and will at the hearing seek the reliefs set out in paragraph 4,» the statement read.
The expectation is that the case will be heard in the early part of December, and it will take two or three weeks I expect to get the judgment written up.
Notably, taking into account that a respondent to such an application is not, and can not, be required to give evidence (see FPR 2010, r 33.14 (4)-RRB-, it is inadvisable for an application for a judgment summons to be heard at the same time as another related application in the proceedings, for example, as in this case, an application to vary a maintenance order.
It will show how long it takes in each court to get a permanent injunction, a summary judgment, a claim construction hearing, a dismissal or a trial.
The question of delays in the Supreme Court will be discussed below where it will be seen that the problem has not gone away, though the delays appear to be more in the time taken between the time of hearing and the date of delivery of judgment rather than in the time taken to have an appeal heard.
I have not attempted a statistical analysis to establish the average time that the Court has taken to deliver judgments after the completion of hearings.
Coordination of civil actions sharing a common question of fact or law is appropriate if one judge hearing all of the actions for all purposes in a selected site or sites will promote the ends of justice taking into account whether the common question of fact or law is predominating and significant to the litigation; the convenience of parties, witnesses, and counsel; the relative development of the actions and the work product of counsel; the efficient utilization of judicial facilities and manpower; the calendar of the courts; the disadvantages of duplicative and inconsistent rulings, orders, or judgments; and, the likelihood of settlement of the actions without further litigation should coordination be denied.
This judgment set out that the two tests are separate, and it does not automatically follow that if the court of another member state is better placed to hear the case that it is in the child's best interests for the transfer to take place.
Of particular note to this post is that notwithstanding the fact that the motion took three days in court to hear, over a period of three months (November 14, 2014, December 17, 2014, February 6, 2015), only 34 weeks had elapsed since the Plaintiff's termination of employment by the time the motion for summary judgment was heard.
To do so would be to make a judgment on no other basis than to take a guess at what is «fair» based what the court has heard.
The Tribunal takes up complaints referred to it by the Commission and holds all the powers of a superior court under the Constitution Act, 1867, which means it has similar power and authority to hear cases and render judgments.
The trial court rescheduled the hearing but refused to grant relief from the judgment, and the relative died before the hearing took place.
The full appeal hearing took place on 17 January 2017 at the Court of Appeal in London, which ruled that whilst the judgment could have explained in greater detail what information could have been provided to the purchaser, the judge has considered what an appropriate summary was in the original judgment.
The practical problem in Toronto is it takes too long to schedule and hear summary judgment motions.
We suggest that the Legislature consider such a change to avoid potential claims that the filing of judgments of certain foreign nations, without prior notice and the opportunity to be heard, may result in an unconstitutional taking of property without due process of law.
A second hearing took place in July on the same issues regarding the more important historic, ie pre-18 January 2008 terms, and judgment on this aspect is awaited.
Delivering his judgment in Evans v Evans [2013] EWHC 506 (Fam), Mr Justice Moylan said: «I regret to say that I also found the approach taken by both parties during the course of the hearing to be unhelpful.
Ultimately, their lordships took the view that whether or not there had been a relevant change in circumstances, must be a matter of fact to be decided by the good sense and sound judgment of the tribunal hearing the application.
And that, from the final decision of any judge, justice, or court inferior to the Circuit Court, appeal might be taken to the Circuit Court of the United States for the district in which the cause was heard, and from the judgment of the said Circuit Court to the Supreme Court of the United States.
So, from filing to hearing, the process will most likely take a few weeks, and from hearing to final judgment, assuming the Agreement is approved at the hearing, the process will take four months.
«When someone really hears you without passing judgment on you, without taking responsibility for you, without trying to mold you, it feels damn good... When I have been listened to and when I have been heard, I am able to perceive my world in a new way and to go on.»
If you have been served, you must show up at court to protect your right to be heard; if you don't come to court, a default judgment may be taken against you.
Unlike a trial, where each party puts on their entire case and the judge then issues a judgment after hearing all evidence, mediation allows for a continual give and take, with both parties having the ability to accommodate each other's concerns during the entire process.
As the iconic Humanistic psychologist Dr. Carl Rogers stated, «When someone really hears you without passing judgment on you, without trying to take responsibility for you, without trying to mold you, it feels damn good!»
In my recent experience with small claims in Rochester, my hearing took about 7 minutes and judgment was issued to me right away.
84 DOS 99 Matter of DOS v. Woodland - failure to appear at hearing; jurisdiction; mortgage applications; failure to pay judgment; ex parte hearing may proceeding upon proof of proper service; DOS has jurisdiction over respondents for acts of misconduct which occurred during licensure even though the licenses expired on their own terms; DOS fails its burden of proof to establish broker failed to obtain signature on agency disclosure form; DOS fails its burden of proof to establish that a broker has an obligation to «pre-qualify» a potential purchaser; broker breached duty to deal honestly with the public when advised purchaser he would assist in obtaining financing and failed to do so; DOS fails its burden of proof that broker wrongfully failed to hold a $ 500.00 deposit in escrow as deposit was remitted to seller with the permission of buyer; failure to pay judgment without a showing that broker is unable to do so is a demonstration of untrustworthiness; no action to be taken for reapplication for broker's license until payment of $ 1,000.00 fine and proof of satisfaction of judgment
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z