The summary
judgment hearing took over three days of court time.
Not exact matches
Knowing how hard we work, how seriously we
take our role, and how deeply we care about our students, it is disheartening to
hear the harsh
judgments that many people so frequently make about teachers.
Clamence was walking across the Pont des Arts on another occasion, when he
heard a mysterious burst of laughter, which he
takes as a mocking
judgment on his life.
Christianity becomes an instrument of mental distress when biblical passages such as this are
taken literally: «You have
heard that it was said to the men of old, «You shall not kill; and whoever kills shall be liable to
judgment.»
«
Take notice that the appellant being dissatisfied with the decision of the governorship election tribunal for Rivers state, sitting in Abuja, contained in the
judgment of the tribunal coram Hon. Justice Suleiman Ambursa (chairman), Hon. Justice Wesley Ibrahim Leha (member) and Hon. Justice Bayo Taiwo (member)(sitting in court no. 23 of the FCT high court dated the 24th of October 2015, doth hereby appeal to the court of appeal upon the grounds set out in paragraph 3 and will at the
hearing seek the reliefs set out in paragraph 4,» the statement read.
The expectation is that the case will be
heard in the early part of December, and it will
take two or three weeks I expect to get the
judgment written up.
Notably,
taking into account that a respondent to such an application is not, and can not, be required to give evidence (see FPR 2010, r 33.14 (4)-RRB-, it is inadvisable for an application for a
judgment summons to be
heard at the same time as another related application in the proceedings, for example, as in this case, an application to vary a maintenance order.
It will show how long it
takes in each court to get a permanent injunction, a summary
judgment, a claim construction
hearing, a dismissal or a trial.
The question of delays in the Supreme Court will be discussed below where it will be seen that the problem has not gone away, though the delays appear to be more in the time
taken between the time of
hearing and the date of delivery of
judgment rather than in the time
taken to have an appeal
heard.
I have not attempted a statistical analysis to establish the average time that the Court has
taken to deliver
judgments after the completion of
hearings.
Coordination of civil actions sharing a common question of fact or law is appropriate if one judge
hearing all of the actions for all purposes in a selected site or sites will promote the ends of justice
taking into account whether the common question of fact or law is predominating and significant to the litigation; the convenience of parties, witnesses, and counsel; the relative development of the actions and the work product of counsel; the efficient utilization of judicial facilities and manpower; the calendar of the courts; the disadvantages of duplicative and inconsistent rulings, orders, or
judgments; and, the likelihood of settlement of the actions without further litigation should coordination be denied.
This
judgment set out that the two tests are separate, and it does not automatically follow that if the court of another member state is better placed to
hear the case that it is in the child's best interests for the transfer to
take place.
Of particular note to this post is that notwithstanding the fact that the motion
took three days in court to
hear, over a period of three months (November 14, 2014, December 17, 2014, February 6, 2015), only 34 weeks had elapsed since the Plaintiff's termination of employment by the time the motion for summary
judgment was
heard.
To do so would be to make a
judgment on no other basis than to
take a guess at what is «fair» based what the court has
heard.
The Tribunal
takes up complaints referred to it by the Commission and holds all the powers of a superior court under the Constitution Act, 1867, which means it has similar power and authority to
hear cases and render
judgments.
The trial court rescheduled the
hearing but refused to grant relief from the
judgment, and the relative died before the
hearing took place.
The full appeal
hearing took place on 17 January 2017 at the Court of Appeal in London, which ruled that whilst the
judgment could have explained in greater detail what information could have been provided to the purchaser, the judge has considered what an appropriate summary was in the original
judgment.
The practical problem in Toronto is it
takes too long to schedule and
hear summary
judgment motions.
We suggest that the Legislature consider such a change to avoid potential claims that the filing of
judgments of certain foreign nations, without prior notice and the opportunity to be
heard, may result in an unconstitutional
taking of property without due process of law.
A second
hearing took place in July on the same issues regarding the more important historic, ie pre-18 January 2008 terms, and
judgment on this aspect is awaited.
Delivering his
judgment in Evans v Evans [2013] EWHC 506 (Fam), Mr Justice Moylan said: «I regret to say that I also found the approach
taken by both parties during the course of the
hearing to be unhelpful.
Ultimately, their lordships
took the view that whether or not there had been a relevant change in circumstances, must be a matter of fact to be decided by the good sense and sound
judgment of the tribunal
hearing the application.
And that, from the final decision of any judge, justice, or court inferior to the Circuit Court, appeal might be
taken to the Circuit Court of the United States for the district in which the cause was
heard, and from the
judgment of the said Circuit Court to the Supreme Court of the United States.
So, from filing to
hearing, the process will most likely
take a few weeks, and from
hearing to final
judgment, assuming the Agreement is approved at the
hearing, the process will
take four months.
«When someone really
hears you without passing
judgment on you, without
taking responsibility for you, without trying to mold you, it feels damn good... When I have been listened to and when I have been
heard, I am able to perceive my world in a new way and to go on.»
If you have been served, you must show up at court to protect your right to be
heard; if you don't come to court, a default
judgment may be
taken against you.
Unlike a trial, where each party puts on their entire case and the judge then issues a
judgment after
hearing all evidence, mediation allows for a continual give and
take, with both parties having the ability to accommodate each other's concerns during the entire process.
As the iconic Humanistic psychologist Dr. Carl Rogers stated, «When someone really
hears you without passing
judgment on you, without trying to
take responsibility for you, without trying to mold you, it feels damn good!»
In my recent experience with small claims in Rochester, my
hearing took about 7 minutes and
judgment was issued to me right away.
84 DOS 99 Matter of DOS v. Woodland - failure to appear at
hearing; jurisdiction; mortgage applications; failure to pay
judgment; ex parte
hearing may proceeding upon proof of proper service; DOS has jurisdiction over respondents for acts of misconduct which occurred during licensure even though the licenses expired on their own terms; DOS fails its burden of proof to establish broker failed to obtain signature on agency disclosure form; DOS fails its burden of proof to establish that a broker has an obligation to «pre-qualify» a potential purchaser; broker breached duty to deal honestly with the public when advised purchaser he would assist in obtaining financing and failed to do so; DOS fails its burden of proof that broker wrongfully failed to hold a $ 500.00 deposit in escrow as deposit was remitted to seller with the permission of buyer; failure to pay
judgment without a showing that broker is unable to do so is a demonstration of untrustworthiness; no action to be
taken for reapplication for broker's license until payment of $ 1,000.00 fine and proof of satisfaction of
judgment