Sentences with phrase «judgment motion dates»

Arguably, aggressive counsel could obtain a trial date quicker than they could obtain a summary judgment motion date.
[2] Given the directions made by the Supreme Court of Canada on the issue of proportionality in summary judgment motions in its recent decision in Hryniak v. Maudlin, 2014 SCC 7 (CanLII), 2014 SCC 7, in my view when a request is made in an action on the Toronto Region Commercial List for a summary judgment motion date, one judge should case manage the proceeding.

Not exact matches

The motion brought before the court by Sheriff, requesting it to disqualify the other faction from appealing the judgment of the Appeal Court was heard and argued, but the court asked the counsels to submit written arguments before the next date of hearing.
As an existing judgment reaches its expiration date, the person or business owed may renew the judgment by filing a motion with the court.
Judgment is entered in favor of Defendants Microsoft Corporation, Electronic Arts Inc., Harmonix Music Systems, Inc., Majesco Entertainment Co., Ubisoft Inc., and Nintendo of America Inc.'s (collectively «Defendants») on Plaintiff Richard J. Baker's («Baker») claims for infringement pursuant to the Court's ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS» MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (D.I. 135) dated January 3, 2017 and filed on January 4, 2017.
By order dated July 14, 2014, the motion judge, the Honourable Justice Martin S. James of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice sitting at Ottawa, granted Mr. Arnone's motion for summary judgment and ordered Best Theratronics to pay (i) damages equal to the gross amount of the salary Arnone would have earned until he qualified for an unreduced pension, less payments made to him to satisfy the statutory obligations of the employer, (ii) $ 65,000 representing the present value of the loss of an unreduced pension, (iii) a retirement allowance equal to 30 weeks» pay, and (iv) costs totaling $ 52,280.09.
The landlord moved for partial summary judgment on the rent that had already accrued and was undisputedly owing at the date of the motion... [more]
Instead of saying, «Short - term project,» it's better to say, «Short - term project, summary judgment motion research project, project end date January 31.»
(a) a short form order dated April 23, 2003, issued and signed by the Honorable M. Ritholtz, granting Mr. Kaufman's motion for a default judgment and referring the issue of damages to an inquest, (b) the defendant's order to show cause, signed by the Honorable M. Ritholtz on September 12, 2003, seeking to set aside the default judgment, accompanied by defense counsel's signed affirmation and the defendant's signed, but not notarized, affidavit, (c) the respondent's affirmation in opposition to the defendant's order to show cause, dated October 8, 2003, (d) a preliminary conference stipulation and order dated March 17, 2004, signed by the respondent and defense counsel, and (e) a notice of compliance / settlement conference scheduled for October 21, 2004, before the Honorable M. Ritholtz.
The amount of time between the entry of the judgment and the date the motion to set it aside was filed
The wife brought a motion to change seeking to extend spousal support beyond that date, which was dismissed by way of summary judgment.
The basic procedural history of the matter (e.g., five depositions, unsuccessful motion for summary judgment, twelve months from filing to trial, settled one week prior to trial date, etc.),
Is «summary judgment» really that summary when you have to participate in the normal discovery process and when you can get a trial date faster than a motion date?
For example, Justice Brown points out that counsel prefer to wait nine months to obtain a hearing date for a full day summary judgment motion instead of accepting a trial date three months down the road — a point that leads me off on a personal tangent...
It is easy to predict right now that there will be a rash of motions to continue trial dates as that expiration date approaches, so that the judgments will be free of the State's claim.
So, in the circle of life that is the Toronto motions culture, an Issues List developed at the suggestion of an experienced case management judge to avoid summary judgment motions and to secure an expedited trial of a dispute on its merits, now finds itself confined to the dustbin of «judicial nice tries», with the parties turning their backs on the proffered expedited trial date and hunkering down for summary judgment motions.
(1) If a supplemental petition or a motion for modification of time - sharing and parental responsibility is filed because a parent is activated, deployed, or temporarily assigned to military service and the parent's ability to comply with time - sharing is materially affected as a result, the court may not issue an order or modify or amend a previous judgment or order that changes time - sharing as it existed on the date the parent was activated, deployed, or temporarily assigned to military service, except that a court may enter a temporary order to modify or amend time - sharing if there is clear and convincing evidence that the temporary modification or amendment is in the best interests of the child.
Namazi Real Estate Corp. v. Johnson (243 A.D. 2d 396)-- broker's motion for summary judgment denied and defendant's cross-motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint affirmed; broker failed to establish they produced a buyer ready, willing and able to purchase the property at terms set by sellers; parties were not in agreement as to the closing date, the clause entitling defendants to terminate the contract unconditionally, and the date when the defendants would vacate the premises; broker failed to establish that sellers wrongfully or arbitrarily prevented completion of a deal.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z