You can not form any historical
judgment of right or wrong by considering each group separately.
The atmosphere of a legalistic ethos is filled with criticism, conditional fellowship based on preformed
judgments of right conduct and right doctrine, and communication rooted only in having common ground.
Not exact matches
This is not about making
judgments of what is «
right» and what is «wrong.»
The «
right to be forgotten» made headlines in the U.S. in 2014 when a citizen
of Spain won a
judgment that Google had to take down personal information about him.
It's based on my confidence that they will use their own
judgment in terms
of coming to the
right decision.
Albert Einstein would later write about her, «Her strength, her purity
of will, her austerity toward herself, her objectivity, her incorruptible
judgment - all these were
of a kind seldom found in a single individual... Once she had recognized a certain way as a
right one, she pursued it without compromise and with extreme tenacity.»
JUDGMENT CALLS: 12 Stories
of Big Decisions and the Teams that Got Them
Right (Harvard Business Review) Thomas H. Davenport and Brook Manville
The more I learned about the real Marcia Clark, not the two dimensional cardboard cutout I saw in the news, but the complicated, whip - smart giant - hearted mother
of two, who woke up every day, put both feet on the floor and dedicated herself to
righting an unconciscable wrong, the loss
of two innocents Ron Goldman and Nicole Brown, the more I had to recognize that I, along with the rest
of the world, had been superficial and careless in my
judgment, and I'm here today to tell you I'm sorry,» Paulson said to Clark while onstage.
So it's very inefficient and it's an unethical position, because if I'm making
judgments in my head about you or vice versa and I'm not allowing you to be part
of that decision and understand the criteria, one
of the most basic things
of justice is the
right to face one's accuser.
«And
right now we have a Prime Minister that has demonstrated such a lack
of judgment, a lack
of openness, transparency, accountability that Canadians have become incredibly cynical about all
of us who choose to serve in this place.
To the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, you agree to indemnify, defend and hold harmless Daily Harvest, and our respective past, present and future employees, officers, directors, contractors, consultants, equityholders, suppliers, vendors, service providers, parent companies, subsidiaries, affiliates, agents, representatives, predecessors, successors and assigns (individually and collectively, the «Daily Harvest Parties»), from and against all actual or alleged Daily Harvest Party or third party claims, damages, awards,
judgments, losses, liabilities, obligations, penalties, interest, fees, expenses (including, without limitation, attorneys» fees and expenses) and costs (including, without limitation, court costs, costs
of settlement and costs
of pursuing indemnification and insurance),
of every kind and nature whatsoever, whether known or unknown, foreseen or unforeseen, matured or unmatured, or suspected or unsuspected, in law or equity, whether in tort, contract or otherwise (collectively, «Claims»), including, but not limited to, damages to property or personal injury, that are caused by, arise out
of or are related to (a) your use or misuse
of the Sites, Content or Products, (b) any User Content you create, post, share or store on or through the Sites or our pages or feeds on third party social media platforms, (c) any Feedback you provide, (d) your violation
of these Terms, (e) your violation
of the
rights of another, and (f) any third party's use or misuse
of the Sites or Products provided to you.
Forward - thinking companies actively develop the collective literacy and contextual intelligence
of the board — cultivating, in particular, a shared set
of assumptions about where their industry and markets are going so that they are prepared to make the
right risk / reward
judgment calls together with management.
Given the absence
of a public trading market
of our common stock, and in accordance with the American Institute
of Certified Public Accountants Accounting and Valuation Guide, Valuation
of Privately - Held Company Equity Securities Issued as Compensation, our board
of directors exercised reasonable
judgment and considered numerous and subjective factors to determine the best estimate
of fair value
of our common stock, including independent third - party valuations
of our common stock; the prices at which we sold shares
of our convertible preferred stock to outside investors in arms - length transactions; the
rights, preferences, and privileges
of our convertible preferred stock relative to those
of our common stock; our operating results, financial position, and capital resources; current business conditions and projections; the lack
of marketability
of our common stock; the hiring
of key personnel and the experience
of our management; the introduction
of new products; our stage
of development and material risks related to our business; the fact that the option grants involve illiquid securities in a private company; the likelihood
of achieving a liquidity event, such as an initial public offering or a sale
of our company given the prevailing market conditions and the nature and history
of our business; industry trends and competitive environment; trends in consumer spending, including consumer confidence; and overall economic indicators, including gross domestic product, employment, inflation and interest rates, and the general economic outlook.
«I'm an attorney and like to wait until I have the evidence before I make any kind
of snap
judgment and I reserve my
right to wait to judge this,» said Parkland Commissioner Ken Cutler.
The fact that certain
rights were intentionally omitted from the documents compared to typical VC financing documents is a
judgment call that requires the guidance
of an experienced attorney.
For me, it was a like a real eye opener,
right from how it's very important to have a Financial Plan and have an objective for investing, to Goals, having Patience and confidence on your stocks, when is the
right time to invest, valuations, how and why small investors should invest, how to not let your
judgment be clouded by others, teaching investment as an ART to our children, and how to avoid the pitfalls
of investing.
While only 6 %
of respondents were peaceful to cruise using cryptocurrencies in their retirement plans, another 14 % were meddlesome in the
judgment but not certain that Bitcoin or identical vehicles were
right for them.
On appeal, the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed the Missouri
judgment but drew up far short
of recognizing a
right of individual patient autonomy.
In Hawthorne's tale vice and providence together render
judgment, but it is a slow, steady hand that
rights evils over the course
of centuries.
Rather, it is a set
of Lochner - like expansions (in my
judgment)
of the Founders» understanding
of natural
rights (which itself may be the correct understanding
of Locke, or not, and which, to necessarily complicate things even more, itself was usually moderated in practice by most Founders holding elements
of the communitarian - classical view) that is the real ground
of my distinction between the natural
rights conception
of liberty and the economic autonomy conception.
As he explains, «it is necessary to judge according to the written law, else
judgment wold fall short
of either
of natural or
of the positive
right.»
Yes, we do reject the idea
of «
right» and «wrong» having an existence independent
of the perspective
of the person making the relevant
judgment.
But I respect your
right to fear the
judgment of your God.
My own
judgment,
of course, is that they are
right.
It appears that he's trying to sift history and take a more «nuanced» view
of how history formed Christianity... I wasn't really getting a value
judgment from him on the
right or wrong, just that it's a mixed bag, like all history is.
Short
of that final
judgment, however, we should be grateful that such secularists are trying to do the
right thing.
Sometimes these sources point in different directions — as when a
right not recognized in the past becomes widely understood as fundamental — and a court has to make a
judgment between the two lines
of argument.
Men, one by one, now had status, each in his own
right, and the sense
of equity, no longer satisfied by mass
judgment on mass sin, demanded fair play for every individual.
The ideological boxes labeled liberal, conservative, neoconservative, etc. undergo a salutary rearranging by this company
of diverse thinkers united by a devotion to freedom,
rights, responsibility, virtue, and a market economy within the framework
of moral
judgment.
It is important as far as possible to remove temptation by changes in the situation that surrounds us, to develop strength
of will and clearness
of moral
judgment through any help other people can give us, to utilize whatever inner resources we have for doing
right.
Ireland's highest court will deliver
judgment later on a landmark case on the
rights of the unborn.
«If the Church does not regard Israel from a Christian point
of view,» he remarked, «if it does not recognize the theological significance
of this people, having a national destiny that can be cultivated only in Zion, the Church has no
right to pass
judgment on Israel.»
In the first place, no amount
of prayer will take the place
of right discernment
of good and evil through standards set by the outlook
of Jesus,
of right calculation
of the probable consequences
of our acts,
of right knowledge and
judgment of the total situation in which our lives are set.
But the fact is» or at least our firm
judgment is» that on most
of the great issues
of that time, C&C was
right and its critics were usually wrong.
Too many corners
of the Church have been infected with a legalistic, performance - based view
of God in which God stands over our lives with crossed arms and a disappointed scowl, applauding only when we get everything just
right and rendering
judgment on everything we do wrong.
Restrictions on the
right to migrate should never be imposed arbitrarily or lightly, but the extent
of the
right is nevertheless a matter for prudential
judgment.
To make such
judgments about types, it should be noted, is not to suggest that civil authorities have any
right to be the endorsing or disapproving agency, or that in the reaction to Jonestown, majorities have a
right to go backlashing or would be wise to undertake a binge
of repression.
But Novak persuasively suggests that there are three such
rights: first, that God hear the cry
of our prayer; second, that He tell us how we should live; and, third, that He render
judgment on our actions, thus making us moral agents
of consequence.
If after this he sees to it that he does the opposite from the
judgment of the crowd, then he, for the most part, does the
right thing.
In my
judgment, the «Social Principles»
of the United Methodists, the «Statement on Economic Justice»
of the Lutheran Church in America, the «Statement on Human
Rights»
of the United Church
of Christ, and the World Council
of Churches» themes
of «Justice, Sustainability and Participation» are models
of such efforts.
Or if at the outset a man does the opposite, and he is then so fortunate as to have the
judgment of the crowd express itself to the contrary, then he can be fairly certain that he has laid hold
of the
right thing.
The insights here, ugly though some
of them may be, have really helped me understand some
of the «Christian» mentality, especially the people who jumped
right in passing
judgment on me, telling me to «calm down» and more.
Second,
judgment implies a determination
of right and wrong.
And a lot
of these things are happening around us, and somebody is going to get mad at me for saying what I am about to say
right now, but I am going to give you my honest opinion: I think we have turned our back on the Scripture and on God Almighty and I think he has allowed
judgment to fall upon us.
I see nothing
of Jesus in the Christian
right, but here in the Bible belt, in many
of the Sunday sermons, I've heard more
judgment handed down in one hour than I'd hear in a whole week in a court
of law.
As I have argued in these pages and elsewhere, the «presumption,» by detaching the just war way
of thinking from its proper political context» the
right use
of sovereign public authority toward the end
of tranquillitas ordinis, or peace» tends to invert the structure
of classic just war analysis and turn it into a thin casuistry, giving priority consideration to necessarily contingent in bello
judgments (proportionality
of means, discrimination or noncombatant immunity) over what were always understood to be the prior ad bellum questions («prior» in that, inter alia, we can have a greater degree
of moral clarity about them).
We have read the free exercise claims and arguments put forward by the prochoice lawyers in the current wave
of litigation, and in our
judgment, these claims would not be meritorious under even the most generous interpretation
of free exercise
rights under RFRA.
Time after time the prophets announce
judgment because justice has been perverted and the
rights of the poor have been denied.
In our
judgment, building an Islamic Center in the shadow
of the World Trade Center will cause some victims more pain — unnecessarily — and that is not
right.
«In our
judgment, building an Islamic Center in the shadow
of the World Trade Center will cause some victims more pain - unnecessarily - and that is not
right,» the statement continued.