Sentences with phrase «judgment of right and wrong»

Not exact matches

This is not about making judgments of what is «right» and what is «wrong.»

The more I learned about the real Marcia Clark, not the two dimensional cardboard cutout I saw in the news, but the complicated, whip - smart giant - hearted mother of two, who woke up every day, put both feet on the floor and dedicated herself to righting an unconciscable wrong, the loss of two innocents Ron Goldman and Nicole Brown, the more I had to recognize that I, along with the rest of the world, had been superficial and careless in my judgment, and I'm here today to tell you I'm sorry,» Paulson said to Clark while onstage.

Yes, we do reject the idea of «right» and «wrong» having an existence independent of the perspective of the person making the relevant judgment.

It appears that he's trying to sift history and take a more «nuanced» view of how history formed Christianity... I wasn't really getting a value judgment from him on the right or wrong, just that it's a mixed bag, like all history is.

But the fact is» or at least our firm judgment is» that on most of the great issues of that time, C&C was right and its critics were usually wrong.

Too many corners of the Church have been infected with a legalistic, performance - based view of God in which God stands over our lives with crossed arms and a disappointed scowl, applauding only when we get everything just right and rendering judgment on everything we do wrong.

Second, judgment implies a determination of right and wrong.

They want to make it plain (they are demonstrably often hard put to do so because of the intensity of their own feelings and emotions) that it is judgment in the full sense — justice, the setting right of the woefully wrong.

Now, you are making a judgment that your notion of morality is right and Mr. X is wrong, and you're adding the weight of civil law to it.

He stands in the direct succession of that prophet who saw that judgment must begin in the house of God, and of the even greater prophet who saw that blessing at the altar requires a prior establishment of right relations with the socially wronged [October 3.

As to your claim about the keys being used to determine moral right and wrong, I don't see that anywhere in Matthew 16 or Isaiah 22, and although the Jewish people may have understood this as referring to such judgments, they understood then (and even today) that moral judgments are made by God alone and through a proper understanding of what God has said in Scripture.

But as I urged above, it would be wrong (in my judgment) to try to interpret all this too literally and logically; Prof. Hartshorne was right, I said, in saying that the symbol of the divine Triunity, like the «incarnation» and «atonement» as symbols, is much more appropriately retained as a symbol, as imaginative proclamation; it can then retain its indicative and suggestive value without our seeking to phrase it in the idiom of some particular philosophy or world view.

Third, when we say that a wrong act is a sin, even if we do not conceive of God as standing in judgment we are still pointing out that there is another dimension involved in our choices between right and wrong.

When we move to the level of a moral judgment, we move away from statements of merely personal taste and private belief; we speak of the things that are more generally or universally right or wrong, just or unjust, for others as well as ourselves.

They were right about Iraq, the biggest foreign policy judgment call of the past half - century, when Labour and the Tories were both catastrophically and stupidly wrong.

Begin to cast judgment on your pose, your practice, or yourself as «right» or «wrong,» and the ledge you're on can expand into a never - ending plateau of self - doubt.

This conclusion, however, is a matter of judgment, and can't be characterized as either «right» or «wrong».

Surely it was only my opinion that I wrote, but anyone can look at the two main posts side - by - side and form their own judgments of where I am wrong and where, if ever, I am right.

Unfortunately, therefore, one may expect that the prophecy of Judge Pinto de Albuquerque expressed at the time of the ECtHR judgment in A. and B. v. Norway — according to which the «progressive and mutual collaboration between the two European courts will evidently once again be deeply disturbed, Strasbourg going the wrong way and Luxembourg going the right way» (§ 80)-- comes true.

«I think equality is an overarching issue for all this, but it still comes down to just a basic moral judgment of what is right and wrong.

Thus, while I am very much on board with Roberts» overall project, I am enough of a practicing lawyer to wonder whether comparative international law can allow us to assess right and wrong interpretations of international law, and whether government intervention should affect such judgments of even relative legal correctness.

So witnesses, defendants and even victims may all be bound - over, with the important caveat that they must have been adjudged to have engaged in conduct that was criminal or immoral or, as the Divisional Court eloquently puts it, engaged in «wrong [conduct] rather than right in the judgment of the majority of contemporary citizens» (see Hughes v Holley (1987) 86 Cr App R 130, [1987] Crim LR 253).

Before the commercial mediators and counsel stop reading and click on the «delete» key, I ask them to consider the possibility that Mr. McMahon isn't making judgments about which method is «right» or «wrong» but, rather, is trying to say that the full potential and power of mediation is not being engaged in the commercial model.

Two recent judgments underscoring the potential high cost of the UK getting it wrong in its dealing with businesses and hence being liable to pay damages under the Human Rights Act for breach of its A1P1 obligations.

This is not a book that makes a lot of black and white, right and wrong judgments about sexual behavior.

All of the activities are designed to build trust, healthy relationships, and a full conscience (i.e., age appropriate ability to use moral judgment to choose right from wrong and to feel remorse for wrongdoing) in traumatized children while supporting their parents to provide for their special needs and powerful nurturing.

The trial judge's decision was appealed, and the Florida Supreme Court pointed out that while the judge was right in finding that the board of directors had been wrong to demand that the unit owners pay for the judgments, the result was to leave the condominium property as a whole vulnerable to liens by those who won those judgments.