Three weeks ago, the Dutch Supreme Court rendered
a judgment on the immunity of execution of state property, leading to a complex legal case.
Not exact matches
State
immunity would have been enough
on its own to dispose of the injunction, but the court also dealt with the important jurisdictional issues raised by ETI's reliance
on Civil Jurisdiction and
Judgments Act 1982, s 25 as the basis for the court's jurisdiction
And even if they can, obtaining civil
judgments against a state governor and other heads of agencies won't be easy, given that Michigan confers
immunity on its high - ranking officials for decisions made while carrying out their responsibilities.
When the state sought summary
judgment on sovereign
immunity grounds, the trial court granted it, but the appellate court reversed.
Like the enforcement of a
judgment, the enforcement of an Award as a result of a waiver of
immunity is based
on consensual obligations undertaken in a commercial contractual context.
Lord Collins»
judgment on this point is referred to by Lady Fox in her book, The Law of State
Immunity (3rd Edition) at page 379 as the corrected view of the law prior to the 1978 Act.
posts here and here) have cases pending before them and two lower courts in Canada and the US have recently issued
judgments on the subject - matter
immunity of foreign officials.
She successfully defended a Connecticut state marshal in a case involving the legality of entering a home, and obtained summary
judgment on the basis of the qualified
immunity doctrine.
The UK Supreme Court decision in NML Capital Ltd v Republic of Argentina -LRB-[2011] UKSC 31) confirms that a State is able to raise sovereign
immunity as a defence in respect of enforcement proceedings of foreign
judgments and awards, even if the underlying proceedings relate to commercial transactions unless the State has expressly waived sovereign
immunity as a defence to enforcement (as it had
on the facts of that case).
Since joining FLR, Andrea has worked
on numerous pleadings and memoranda involving motions to dismiss, to compel discovery, and for summary
judgment on issues such as contracts (including personal services contracts), a wide variety of tort - based claims, punitive damages, privilege and sovereign
immunity, insurance coverage, family law, Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act, Health Care Quality Improvement Act
immunity and peer review, and estates and trusts.
Last week the UK Supreme Court delivered
judgments in two landmark cases
on immunity.
At 66 follows an extensive list of arguments leading to a conclusion of submission, with particular emphasis
on Notices of Appeal, each of which included a merit - based objection to the
judgment appealed from but contained no assertion that the US courts lacked jurisdiction by reason of, or that the claims were barred by, sovereign
immunity.
The
judgment therefore is interesting firstly for its discussion of CJEU weight in residual conflict of laws; secondly for the Court's view
on submission and sovereign
immunity — in my view very much the right one.