Why do you think
your judgment on these complex issues is the equal of that of people who have studied the topic for decades?»
Not exact matches
On the basis of experience from a variety of sources a religious person and the theologian formulate a theory which, like any theory dealing with
complex issues in science, is a matter of weighing one experience against another, together with much subjective
judgment.
In line with this view, Gary Hart, the retired U.S. Senator and one - time presidential hopeful, argued that although a big part of success as president is picking smart people for key positions, «it takes a pretty keen mind, honed by study, travel, experience, and exposure to competing ideas, to form good
judgment and to know whom to trust
on complex substantive
issues.»
Science can help inform
judgment calls
on complex issues, but it can't make them
on behalf of society.
While it will be interesting to follow how this summary
judgment motion progresses, this case illustrates that the expanded evidentiary powers
on a summary
judgment allow the Court to require that further oral evidence be adduced to assist with determining whether a genuine
issue requiring a trial exists, even where the matters in dispute deal with
complex technical
issues.
While AI is handling more and more routine work in transactions, the lawyers need to focus
on increasingly
complex issues which call for creativity,
judgment and efficient communication.
Author: Evan Ivkovic, J.D., Law Works P.C. Editor: Ben Hanuka In Hepburn v AlarmForce Industries Inc., released
on October 6, 2017, by the Ontario Superior Court of Justice in London, the court dismissed a franchisee's summary
judgment motion for rescission and bad faith conduct under the Arthur Wishart Act because the factual
issues were
complex that require a trial (legally, there were «genuine
issues requiring a trial»).
The
judgment on modified universalism deals with
complex cross-border insolvency
issues and the extent to which the Guernsey Royal Court can assist foreign insolvency proceedings and remains the leading
judgment in this area.
In Hepburn v AlarmForce Industries Inc., released
on October 6, 2017, by the Ontario Superior Court of Justice in London, the court dismissed a franchisee's summary
judgment motion for rescission and bad faith conduct under the Arthur Wishart Act because the factual
issues were
complex that require a trial (legally, there were «genuine
issues requiring a trial»).