Technically, saying the debtor is
judgment proof in the above example is a misnomer.
Not exact matches
Not sin, for it is thought of as a universal human attribute; nor forgiveness, for it is conceived as a mere event
in the world of external objects, on which man by his very theories and
proofs exercises
judgment, asserting that divine forgiveness can and must be thus and so.
further
proof that Elohim is «spirit»
in a general sense can be found
in the Book of Exodus Chapter 12 Verse 12 where it reads: «For I will pass through the land of Egypt on that night, and will strike all the firstborn
in the land of Egypt, both man and beast; and against all the gods of Egypt I will execute
judgment: I am the LORD.»
Jesus» resurrection, and upon the message, (a) the expectation of the coming
judgment, with Christ as judge, and (b) the promise of salvation of those who repented and trusted
in him, taken along with (c) the purely subsidiary and qualifying or evidential reference to Jesus» earthly life and ministry — this very relation between hope,
proof, and historic fact is the relation which prevailed
in the period of the oral tradition of the sayings and deeds of Jesus, and eventually fashioned the structure of the Synoptic Gospels.
Nothing
in the Constitution specifies any particular standard of
proof that must be met, so if enough members of each body said they believed the President did something, no matter how ridiculous the evidence might be, there would be no basis for any court to overturn that
judgment.
Chances are strong that the neighbor
in this example is what's commonly known as «
judgment proof,» meaning they have no assets or income worth collecting on.
In these situations, if it is anticipated that the judgment - proof status will end in the foreseeable future then the consumer should be making a plan to determine which form of debt relief would be appropriate when the income resumes and the judgment proof status end
In these situations, if it is anticipated that the
judgment -
proof status will end
in the foreseeable future then the consumer should be making a plan to determine which form of debt relief would be appropriate when the income resumes and the judgment proof status end
in the foreseeable future then the consumer should be making a plan to determine which form of debt relief would be appropriate when the income resumes and the
judgment proof status ends.
In this case, the consumer might just explain to his creditors that he is
judgment proof — can not pay — and does not intend to file bankruptcy or seek any other form of debt relief program.
In these cases I often discourage bankruptcy and instead write each creditor advising the creditor that my client is
judgment proof with no source of funds that can be garnished.
If you lose your «
judgment proof» status because of a change
in your financial status, creditors or collectors can seek a
judgment and, if successful, also seek wage garnishment of up to 25 % of your disposable income.
But then it is followed with,
in essence (other words are used but mean the same), the current level of analysis and
judgments applied to the hypothesis of AGW is such that it is,
in fact,
proof par excellence, and need not be further questioned.
This is not a case where the standard of
proof on a motion for summary
judgment would be relaxed
in the name of proportionality.
Our statute provides,
in essence, that properly - executed prenuptial agreements are binding absent «unconscionability,» which requires
proof of inequality that is «so strong and manifest as to shock the conscience and confound the
judgment of any [person] of common sense.»
[1] The issues
in this appeal are whether the trial judge's reasons for
judgment were sufficient and whether the trial judge properly applied the burden of
proof in a criminal case.
«Kozinski argued that today we live
in an age when whistleblowers are unknowable, documents are leaked without consequence, blogger journalists are anonymous and
judgment proof, and the mainstream media is
in financial peril.
An interesting
judgment concerning burdens of
proof in claims for transactions at an undervalue was delivered on 31 August 2016 by HHJ David Cooke
in Re Kiss Cards Ltd [2016] EWHC 2176 (Ch).
Success
in a medical negligence claim depends on more than
proof of an error
in judgment or practice on the part of a health care professional.
Specific topics covered include the role of the prosecutor, defendant and justice of the peace; the presumption of innocence;
proof beyond a reasonable doubt and findings of credibility; elements of an offence; guilty pleas to an offence charged or another offence; mens rea, strict liability and absolute liability offences; defences to regulatory charges, including due diligence, reasonable mistake of fact and officially induced error; trial procedure; presentation of evidence; rules of evidence; the voir dire; dealing with the unrepresented defendant; Charter applications; access to justice issues; paralegals and lawyers
in the courtroom; requests for a bilingual trial; articulating reasons for
judgment; delivery of a
judgment; sentencing; and trials of young persons.
Affirming the trial court's
judgment, the appeals court provides a useful summary of the type of
proof needed to sustain constructive fraud and slander of title claims
in the construction lien setting and when attorneys» fees can be awarded to prevailing parties under Illinois» mechanics lien statute, 770 ILCS 60/1 (the Act).
For personal injury lawyers we require
proof of 3 cases that have gone to trial
in the last 5 years resulting
in verdict for that lawyer and we also require 2 motions for summary
judgment ruled
in favor of that attorney.
In 2014, Weil won a significant victory before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit that affirmed the trial court's Daubert and summary judgment orders in the lead case, which excluded plaintiffs» expert testimony and resultantly found that plaintiffs could not sustain their burden of proo
In 2014, Weil won a significant victory before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit that affirmed the trial court's Daubert and summary
judgment orders
in the lead case, which excluded plaintiffs» expert testimony and resultantly found that plaintiffs could not sustain their burden of proo
in the lead case, which excluded plaintiffs» expert testimony and resultantly found that plaintiffs could not sustain their burden of
proof.
In the intervening period they had sought to make themselves
judgment proof by transferring assets to their wives and children and a Guernsey company.
While Lord Justice Mummery's
judgment does not add to or alter the Court of Appeal guidance
in Wong v Igen Ltd [2005] EWCA Civ 142, [2005] 3 All ER 812, his application of the burden of
proof rules provides some useful insights into the interpretation of the Sex Discrimination Act 1975 (SDA 1975), s 63A (2).
Support for the criminal standard can be found
in the
judgment of the Divisional Court
in Re A Solicitor [1993] QB 69, which considered the standard of
proof to be applied by the SDT's predecessor, the Disciplinary Tribunal of the Law Society.
Certificate of Deposit: you can get this certificate from the Rhode Island General Treasurer if you bring to him or her two things: $ 60,000
in cash or securities (such as a government bond or note, which can be legally purchased by savings banks), and
proof that, if you were ever involved
in an accident before, there are no records of unsatisfied
judgments against you
in the county you live
in.
Chances are strong that the neighbor
in this example is what's commonly known as «
judgment proof,» meaning they have no assets or income worth collecting on.
Reinstating suspended drivers license status requires a motorist to supply a filing for
proof of insurance except
in the case of suspension under safety responsibility and damage
judgment laws, which encompass situations such as an uninsured motorist.
123 DOS 93 Matter of DOS v. Harrington - requests for adjournments must comply with 19 NYCRR § 400.11; broker permits unlicensed salesperson to work; broker who fails to pay
judgment without
proof of inability is guilty of untrustworthiness, broker's failure to timely file termination of association notices not excused by claim of unhappiness with filing fee; prior discipline considered
in imposing sanction; two - month suspension and continuing suspension until
judgment is satisfied
84 DOS 99 Matter of DOS v. Woodland - failure to appear at hearing; jurisdiction; mortgage applications; failure to pay
judgment; ex parte hearing may proceeding upon
proof of proper service; DOS has jurisdiction over respondents for acts of misconduct which occurred during licensure even though the licenses expired on their own terms; DOS fails its burden of
proof to establish broker failed to obtain signature on agency disclosure form; DOS fails its burden of
proof to establish that a broker has an obligation to «pre-qualify» a potential purchaser; broker breached duty to deal honestly with the public when advised purchaser he would assist
in obtaining financing and failed to do so; DOS fails its burden of
proof that broker wrongfully failed to hold a $ 500.00 deposit
in escrow as deposit was remitted to seller with the permission of buyer; failure to pay
judgment without a showing that broker is unable to do so is a demonstration of untrustworthiness; no action to be taken for reapplication for broker's license until payment of $ 1,000.00 fine and
proof of satisfaction of
judgment
214 DOS 97 Matter of DOS v. Laymon - accounting to client; bad check; deposits; failure to pay
judgments; proper business practices; jurisdiction; DOS retains jurisdiction after expiration of license (for failure to pay renewal fee) where acts occurred during licensure; violation of 19 NYCRR 175.1 by depositing clients» funds into operating account and failing to maintain special bank account; violation of 19 NYCRR 175.2 for failing to account to client; broker engaged
in fraudulent practices by accepting monies he was required to retain
in escrow, depositing said monies into his operating account, failing to return same to its rightful owner and by purporting to make refunds by issuing bad checks;
in light of broker's financial inability to do so, failure to promptly satisfy
judgments was not a demonstration of untrustworthiness; there was no violation of 19 NYCRR 175.3 (b) where broker was not managing rental properties; real estate broker's license revoked; reapplication for broker's license conditioned upon
proof of payment of restitution with interest and
proof of satisfaction of
judgment with interest
185 DOS 05 DOS v. Britt - disclosure of conditions affecting the value or desirability of listed premises; DOS fails its burden of
proof; res judicata;
judgment rendered
in civil court between buyer and seller is not controlling
in administrative proceeding against licensee where DOS and licensee were not parties
in the civil suit and professional conduct of the licensee was not litigated; duty of disclosure to a buyer by a seller's agent is derivative; seller's agent must make the same disclosure to a buyer that the law requires a seller to make; disclosure by seller's agent to buyer's agent of the condition of the property as known by seller's agent was timely, proper and essentially a disclosure to buyer of that information; DOS has failed to prove by substantial evidence its allegation that basement flooding was a common occurrence or that broker was fully aware that homes
in the neighborhood where the property is located encountered frequent flooding; complaint dismissed