And if this were generally the case it would regularly inform people's
judgments about risk.
The science of human behavior, particularly the psychology of risk perception, robustly shows that we use two systems to make
judgments about risk; reason and affect, facts and feelings.
Mr. Miller's thoughtful letter rightly focuses on «probabilities and prudential
judgments about risks,» although he seems to assume that we know more about recidivism than we do.
We need, rather, an empirical inquiry about probabilities and prudential
judgment about risks.
Drawing on a range of extensive databases can help inform those lawyers advising businesses in dispute resolution who can then make an informed value
judgment about risk and cost.
Not exact matches
Since income and
risk must be estimated at current values, the process involves subjective
judgments about capitalization and discount rates.
Similar to D&B, Experian captures information
about your business» background, company financial information, credit score and
risk factors, banking, trade, and collection history, liens
judgments, bankruptcies, and your industry to create a 100 - point ranking for your business (but the data is weighted and scored differently than the PAYDEX score).
Forward - thinking companies actively develop the collective literacy and contextual intelligence of the board — cultivating, in particular, a shared set of assumptions
about where their industry and markets are going so that they are prepared to make the right
risk / reward
judgment calls together with management.
Just like cupcakes and second hand smoke, these are moral or physical
RISKS about which parents make
judgments every day.
Research results are mixed
about whether these foods definitely increase allergy
risk, so use your best
judgment.
Previous trauma (recent or in the past — abuse, accident, etc.) Feeling of anxiety when exposed to situations similar to the trauma Sensations of «being in the trauma» now Nightmares Emotional numbing / detachment psychosis (very rare) * Paranoia Delusions (
about baby) Hallucinations Irrational thoughts Impulsivity Refusal to eat Poor
judgment Lack decision - making Break with reality Severe insomnia Confusion Higher
risk if bipolar disorder in self or family * Requires urgent care.
In addition, by arguing that capture can not be pursued when there is «undue
risk» to American personnel, the U.S. is making a moral
judgment about whose lives should be prioritized.
In other words, people made a
risk judgment based on factors that had little to do with any knowledge
about the technology itself.
What we do is whittle out the relative likelihood of each of these outcomes so we can make a value
judgment about whether or not the
risks are adequate to move forward.
The knowledge that a genetic variant increases the
risk of spreading a sexually transmitted disease might lead to negative
judgments about, and marginalization of, individuals who carry that variant.
Please remember that this information, in the absence of a visit with a health care professional, must be considered as an educational service only and is not designed to replace a physician's independent
judgment about the appropriateness or
risks of a procedure for a given patient.
Analyzing the nature and severity of early stressful experiences helps us make better
judgments about potential interventions that reduce the
risk of troubling developmental outcomes.
She credits her long tenure to training at Long Beach State, the mentorship of older teachers at her school, her colleagues» willingness to share supplies without a second thought, and the knowledge that she can talk to her principal
about any issue she's having without
risk of
judgment.
LexisNexis
Risk Solutions has estimated that 50 % of public - record information
about tax liens and 96 % of information
about civil
judgments do not include a full or redacted Social Security number and will not meet the new credit bureau requirements resulting from their settlement with the 31 states.
Although the concept of
risk capacity is objective, in actual practice, it is still linked to the investor's real world subjective
judgments and emotions
about investment losses.
The first fork in the road that confront us (in this case, the group of us whom Andy has brought together) appears when we make our individual
judgments about the extent to which the dread to
risk ratio is capable of being manipulated.
The two Democratic members dissented, writing that FERC has a responsibility to make a
judgment about the climate
risks.
But if the science is still work in progress, we do know enough to make some
judgments about what it will take to be on the safe side — to reduce the
risk of exceeding two degrees Celsius (3.6 degrees Fahrenheit) to an acceptable level.
It is widely accepted that
risk is a function of three elements: the triggering event or hazard that could result in a potential loss, the magnitude of what stands to be lost, and
judgments about the probability of the loss occurring — including the level of uncertainty bounding the probability estimate (NRC 1996).
The resulting report is called «No Child Left Alone: Moral
Judgments about Parents Affect Estimates of
Risk to Children.»
Generally, considering that technological applications of scientific models, developed to reduce uncertainty
about real - world
risks, have been widely successful for making life safer and more comfortable for an increasing fraction of the world population, why is there so little trust in the
judgments of scientists who generate and test such models?
While we would have reservations
about the Court's reasoning (for an excellent analysis, see Cathryn Costello's article) and might have hoped for a position closer to that adopted by AG Trstenjak, who posited that a State has a duty to take responsibility for the asylum seeker if a Dublin transfer would expose them to serious
risk of violating (any) fundamental rights, its
judgment represents important progress.
Instead of operating as a well - needed oversight mechanism designed, the 1st tier to ensure that «the
judgment about the degree of
risk is subject to review by the Commissioner, and not left solely to the holder, who may have conflicting interests.»
In her reasons for
judgment, Justice Smith found that, although «persons with disabilities face prejudice and stereotyping and that there is a
risk of unconscious bias
about the quality of life of a person with a disability,» she was «not persuaded that the
risks to persons with disabilities are such that they can not be avoided through practices of careful and well - informed capacity assessments by qualified physicians who are alert to those
risks.»
American,
judgments in Canada (and that
risk about egregious awards has not gone away under the spawn of Morguard, so far as I know — perhaps there's an overriding public policy defence available, but if it didn't work in Beals v Saldhana, it's a pretty narrow remedy), and
Easier, perhaps, because it is stylized: everything from briefs to
judgments and legislation is carefully cropped of individuality and approximated to yesterday's example — understandably, because «It's not
about you, writer» and it is
about avoiding
risk.
The Paposhvili
judgment expands the application of Article 3 in medical cases and raises interesting issues
about our broader understanding of prospective
risk assessments in other types of subsidiary protection / complementary protection and refugee cases.
Without an evaluation of the
risk of the matter, a plan for handling it, and a budget for its likely cost, the client can not, for example, make rational
judgments about whether to pursue the matter (if it is optional), whether to settle litigation, and what resources will be required to handle the matter.
The
judgment accepts the evidence of experts and others who testified
about the ways in which solitary confinement triggers and exacerbates mental health conditions, and increases
risks of self - harm and suicide.
I'd have thought that the realization that most reasons for
judgment get reported, or at leasgt that there's a very real
risk of the reasons getting reported, make lawyers, at least, concerned
about not giving the judge case law on point that's easily enough found and is relevant.
Furthermore, when a covered entity can not practicably obtain an individual's agreement before disclosing protected health information to a relative or to a person involved in the individual's care and is making decisions
about such disclosures consistent with the exercise of professional
judgment regarding the individual's best interest, covered entities must take into account whether such a disclosure is likely to put the individual at
risk of serious harm.
She said: ``... questions of assumption of
risk depend upon a wider range of factors and value
judgments... Although the result in this case may be to bring
about certainty and clarity... such an imposed limit on liability could easily be at the expense of justice in some future case.
Insurance companies and potential employers already make
judgments about who they'll take on as a
risk, and have already disqualified people because their gene sequence indicates they MIGHT develop a particular health problem.