Furthermore, it seems that Congress, through the text of 3553 (a), has told federal judges to make individualized policy
judgments at sentencing.
And, interestingly, we never hear complaints or concerns about unelected federal prosecutors making policy
judgments at sentencing (even though prosecutorial policy judgments are not made in open court nor subject to any kind of review).
As we reflect on these realities, it is valuable to appreciate that executive branch officials make policy
judgments at sentencing all the time.
After Booker, the impact of policy
judgments at sentencing is evident in many ways.
The narrowest reading of Blakely suggests that judges may make all sorts of findings and
judgments at sentencing except juries must make findings of historical fact relating to offense conduct when those factual findings formally increase the upper limit of legally available sentences.
Not exact matches
It consistently described how,
at the end of time, men would appear before the
Judgment Seat of God to give an account of their lives, to hear the
sentence of
judgment passed, and to receive the due reward or punishment.
At the time of his plea, the defendant agreed to pay back $ 100,000 prior to
sentencing and signed a confession of
judgment to repay the remaining amount.
Also, «for those defendants previously convicted and who have failed to satisfy the financial obligations imposed
at sentencing, we will consider federal civil forfeiture actions against their pensions to satisfy criminal
judgments,» the prosecutor said.
At least, he doesn't make any
judgments or condemnations (Hanssen's real - life
sentence is severe enough).
The risk is that diversity of opinion, so vital to the healthy development of the law, may be relegated to the occasional murmur, particularly so if the very same judges who sit on a majority of
sentence appeals insist on inflexible adherence to horizontal stare decisis and maintain that their
judgments, being «first
at bat», must be followed by their colleagues.
Local 10 reports that prosecutors are seeking a relatively lenient
sentence of just 15 months in prison because they believe «Page had a lapse of
judgment and the bank was
at fault for allowing this to happen.»
The Legal Aid,
Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 (LASPO) allows for an additional amount to be paid to a claimant by a defendant in cases where the defendant has refused the claimant's offer to settle and the court has given
judgment for the claimant which is
at least as advantageous to the claimant as the claimant's offer.
In discussion of post-Booker federal
sentencing at the Yale Law School class I recently had the pleasure of attending, I was surprised to often hear the refrain that judges «should not make policy
judgments»
at sentencing.
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Policy
judgments at federal
sentencing: aren't they inevitable and mandated by Congress?
In sum, I questions the assertion that federal judges «should not make policy
judgments»
at sentencing because: (1) such
judgments seem inevitable and are clearly made by prosecutors in every criminal case, and (2) a fair reading of the text of 3553 (a) suggests that Congress has ordered federal judges to make individualized policy
judgments in each and every
sentencing.
But beyond this legal realist premise, it dawns on me that all judicial
sentencing decisions plainly are,
at some level, policy
judgments informed by views on just punishment, crime control, procedural fairness, and other express and implicit considerations.
The case is not closed
at the entry of the
judgment and
sentence or order revoking probation.
One reason the results drop so fast as you narrow your search is that appellate
judgments don't tend to list every relevant
sentencing factor the way the trial courts do, but instead focus on those
at issue on the appeal.
The forfeited $ 48 million will count toward the more than $ 180 million in monetary
judgments Ross was ordered to pay
at sentencing.